» Articles » PMID: 28872272

Understanding Low Sensitivity of Community-based HIV Rapid Testing: Experiences from the HPTN 071 (PopART) Trial in Zambia and South Africa

Abstract

Introduction: Population-wide HIV testing services (HTS) must be delivered in order to achieve universal antiretroviral treatment (ART) coverage. To accurately deliver HTS at such scale, non-facility-based HIV point-of-care testing (HIV-POCT) is necessary but requires rigorous quality assurance (QA). This study assessed the performance of community-wide HTS in Zambia and South Africa (SA) as part of the HPTN 071 (PopART) study and explores the impact of quality improvement interventions on HTS performance.

Methods: Between 2014 and 2016, HIV-POCT was undertaken within households both as part of the randomly selected HPTN 071 research cohort (Population Cohort [PC]) and as part of the intervention provided by community HIV-care providers. HIV-POCT followed national algorithms in both countries. Consenting PC participants provided a venous blood sample in addition to being offered HIV-POCT. We compared results obtained in the PC using a laboratory-based gold standard (GS) testing algorithm and HIV-POCT. Comprehensive QA mechanisms were put in place to support the community-wide testing. Participants who were identified as having a false negative or false positive HIV rapid test were revisited and offered retesting.

Results: We initially observed poor sensitivity (45-54%, 95% confidence interval [CI] 31-69) of HIV-POCT in the PC in SA compared to sensitivity in Zambia for the same time period of 95.8% (95% CI 93-98). In both countries, specificity of HIV-POCT was >98%. With enhanced QA interventions and adoption of the same HIV-POCT algorithm, sensitivity in SA improved to a similar level as in Zambia.

Conclusions: This is one of the first reports of HIV-POCT performance during wide-scale delivery of HTS compared to a GS laboratory algorithm. HIV-POCT in a real-world setting had a lower sensitivity than anticipated. Appropriate choice of HIV-POCT algorithms, intensive training and supervision, and robust QA mechanisms are necessary to optimize HIV-POCT test performance when testing is delivered at a community level. HIV-POCT in clients who did not disclose that they were on ART may have contributed to false negative HIV-POCT results and should be the topic of future research.

Citing Articles

Real-world performance of point-of-care vs. standard-of-care HIV viral load testing in western Kenya: Secondary analysis of Opt4Kids and Opt4Mamas studies.

Giang J, Basha G, Thomas K, Oyaro P, Chohan B, Kingwara L PLOS Glob Public Health. 2024; 4(6):e0003378.

PMID: 38913630 PMC: 11195974. DOI: 10.1371/journal.pgph.0003378.


Prehospital use of point-of-care tests by community health workers: a scoping review.

Ebbs D, Taricia M, Funaro M, ODaniel M, Cappello M Front Public Health. 2024; 12:1360322.

PMID: 38721545 PMC: 11076783. DOI: 10.3389/fpubh.2024.1360322.


Evaluating the sensitivity and specificity of Determine™ HIV-1/2 rapid test using a 0.01M phosphate-buffered saline produced at the Medical Research Council Unit The Gambia for the diagnosis of HIV.

Bote-Casamitjana A, Faye-Joof T, Bah O, Jallow S, Camara A, Jallow O Trans R Soc Trop Med Hyg. 2023; 118(2):127-135.

PMID: 37818849 PMC: 10833640. DOI: 10.1093/trstmh/trad071.


Predictors of participant retention in a community-based HIV prevention cohort: perspectives from the HPTN 071 (PopART) study.

Bell-Mandla N, Wilson E, Sharma D, Sloot R, Bwalya J, Schaap A Trials. 2023; 24(1):434.

PMID: 37370143 PMC: 10294466. DOI: 10.1186/s13063-023-07404-y.


Temporal discrepancies in "rapid" HIV testing: explaining misdiagnoses at the point-of-care in Zimbabwe.

Skovdal M, Jensen F, Maswera R, Beckmann N, Nyamukapa C, Gregson S BMC Infect Dis. 2023; 23(1):9.

PMID: 36609232 PMC: 9817402. DOI: 10.1186/s12879-022-07972-5.


References
1.
Jackson D, Naik R, Tabana H, Pillay M, Madurai S, Zembe W . Quality of home-based rapid HIV testing by community lay counsellors in a rural district of South Africa. J Int AIDS Soc. 2013; 16:18744. PMC: 3830054. DOI: 10.7448/IAS.16.1.18744. View

2.
Sabapathy K, Van den Bergh R, Fidler S, Hayes R, Ford N . Uptake of home-based voluntary HIV testing in sub-Saharan Africa: a systematic review and meta-analysis. PLoS Med. 2012; 9(12):e1001351. PMC: 3514284. DOI: 10.1371/journal.pmed.1001351. View

3.
Wolpaw B, Mathews C, Chopra M, Hardie D, de Azevedo V, Jennings K . The failure of routine rapid HIV testing: a case study of improving low sensitivity in the field. BMC Health Serv Res. 2010; 10:73. PMC: 2851712. DOI: 10.1186/1472-6963-10-73. View

4.
Delaney K, Branson B, Uniyal A, Phillips S, Candal D, Owen S . Evaluation of the performance characteristics of 6 rapid HIV antibody tests. Clin Infect Dis. 2011; 52(2):257-63. DOI: 10.1093/cid/ciq068. View

5.
Smith S, Deveridge A, Berman J, Negin J, Mwambene N, Chingaipe E . Task-shifting and prioritization: a situational analysis examining the role and experiences of community health workers in Malawi. Hum Resour Health. 2014; 12:24. PMC: 4014628. DOI: 10.1186/1478-4491-12-24. View