» Articles » PMID: 28870852

Independent Circuits in Basal Ganglia and Cortex for the Processing of Reward and Precision Feedback

Overview
Journal Neuroimage
Specialty Radiology
Date 2017 Sep 6
PMID 28870852
Citations 6
Authors
Affiliations
Soon will be listed here.
Abstract

In order to understand human decision making it is necessary to understand how the brain uses feedback to guide goal-directed behavior. The ventral striatum (VS) appears to be a key structure in this function, responding strongly to explicit reward feedback. However, recent results have also shown striatal activity following correct task performance even in the absence of feedback. This raises the possibility that, in addition to processing external feedback, the dopamine-centered "reward circuit" might regulate endogenous reinforcement signals, like those triggered by satisfaction in accurate task performance. Here we use functional magnetic resonance imaging (fMRI) to test this idea. Participants completed a simple task that garnered both reward feedback and feedback about the precision of performance. Importantly, the design was such that we could manipulate information about the precision of performance within different levels of reward magnitude. Using parametric modulation and functional connectivity analysis we identified brain regions sensitive to each of these signals. Our results show a double dissociation: frontal and posterior cingulate regions responded to explicit reward but were insensitive to task precision, whereas the dorsal striatum - and putamen in particular - was insensitive to reward but responded strongly to precision feedback in reward-present trials. Both types of feedback activated the VS, and sensitivity in this structure to precision feedback was predicted by personality traits related to approach behavior and reward responsiveness. Our findings shed new light on the role of specific brain regions in integrating different sources of feedback to guide goal-directed behavior.

Citing Articles

Decision-making under ambiguity and risk and executive functions in Parkinson's disease patients: A scoping review of the studies investigating the Iowa Gambling Task and the Game of Dice.

Colautti L, Iannello P, Silveri M, Antonietti A Cogn Affect Behav Neurosci. 2023; 23(5):1225-1243.

PMID: 37198383 PMC: 10545597. DOI: 10.3758/s13415-023-01106-3.


Family income buffers the relationship between childhood adverse experiences and putamen volume.

Herzberg M, Hennefield L, Luking K, Sanders A, Vogel A, Kandala S Dev Neurobiol. 2022; 83(1-2):28-39.

PMID: 36314461 PMC: 10038819. DOI: 10.1002/dneu.22906.


Executive Functions in Decision Making under Ambiguity and Risk in Healthy Adults: A Scoping Review Adopting the Hot and Cold Executive Functions Perspective.

Colautti L, Antonietti A, Iannello P Brain Sci. 2022; 12(10).

PMID: 36291269 PMC: 9599766. DOI: 10.3390/brainsci12101335.


Spontaneous neural activity in the right fusiform gyrus and putamen is associated with consummatory anhedonia in obsessive compulsive disorder.

Du H, Xia J, Fan J, Gao F, Wang X, Han Y Brain Imaging Behav. 2022; 16(4):1708-1720.

PMID: 35257267 DOI: 10.1007/s11682-021-00619-0.


Decision making in Parkinson's disease: An analysis of the studies using the Iowa Gambling Task.

Colautti L, Iannello P, Silveri M, Antonietti A Eur J Neurosci. 2021; 54(10):7513-7549.

PMID: 34655122 PMC: 9299644. DOI: 10.1111/ejn.15497.