» Articles » PMID: 28865046

Prospective Experience of Percutaneous Endoscopic Gastrostomy Tubes Placed by Otorhinolaryngologist-head and Neck Surgeons: safe and Efficacious

Overview
Date 2017 Sep 3
PMID 28865046
Authors
Affiliations
Soon will be listed here.
Abstract

Percutaneous endoscopic gastrostomy (PEG) is often the treatment of choice in head and neck cancer (HNC) patients needing long-term nutritional support. Prospective studies on PEG tube placement in an otorhinolaryngologist service are lacking. At our hospital, otolaryngologist-head and neck (ORL-HN) surgeons-have performed PEG insertions for HNC patients since 2008. We prospectively analyzed 127 consecutive HNC patients who received their PEG tubes at the Department of Otorhinolaryngology-head and neck surgery, and evaluated the outcome of PEG tube insertions performed by ORL-HN surgeons. To compare time delays before and after, PEG placement service was transferred from gastrointestinal surgeons to ORL-HN surgeons, and we retrospectively analyzed a separate group of 110 HNC patients who had earlier received PEG tubes at the Department of Gastrointestinal Surgery. ORL-HN surgeons' success rate in PEG insertion was 97.6%, leading to a final prospective study group of 124 patients. Major complications occurred in four (3.2%): two buried bumper syndromes, one subcutaneous hemorrhage leading to an abscess in the abdominal wall, and one metastasis at the PEG site. The most common minor complication was peristomal granulomatous tissue affecting 23 (18.5%) patients. After the change in practice, median time delay before PEG insertion decreased from 13 to 10 days (P < 0.005). The proportion of early PEG placements within 0-3 days increased from 3.6 to 14.6% (P < 0.005). PEG tube insertion seems to be a safe procedure in the hands of an ORL-HN surgeon. Independence from gastrointestinal surgeons' services reduced the time delay and improved the availability of urgent PEG insertions.

References
1.
Shaw S, Flowers H, OSullivan B, Hope A, Liu L, Martino R . The effect of prophylactic percutaneous endoscopic gastrostomy (PEG) tube placement on swallowing and swallow-related outcomes in patients undergoing radiotherapy for head and neck cancer: a systematic review. Dysphagia. 2015; 30(2):152-75. DOI: 10.1007/s00455-014-9592-z. View

2.
Cruz I, Mamel J, Brady P, Cass-Garcia M . Incidence of abdominal wall metastasis complicating PEG tube placement in untreated head and neck cancer. Gastrointest Endosc. 2005; 62(5):708-11. DOI: 10.1016/j.gie.2005.06.041. View

3.
Van Cutsem E, Arends J . The causes and consequences of cancer-associated malnutrition. Eur J Oncol Nurs. 2006; 9 Suppl 2:S51-63. DOI: 10.1016/j.ejon.2005.09.007. View

4.
Selz P, Santos P . Percutaneous endoscopic gastrostomy. A useful tool for the otolaryngologist-head and neck surgeon. Arch Otolaryngol Head Neck Surg. 1995; 121(11):1249-52. DOI: 10.1001/archotol.1995.01890110027005. View

5.
Ravasco P, Monteiro-Grillo I, Vidal P, Camilo M . Impact of nutrition on outcome: a prospective randomized controlled trial in patients with head and neck cancer undergoing radiotherapy. Head Neck. 2005; 27(8):659-68. DOI: 10.1002/hed.20221. View