» Articles » PMID: 28861508

Affinity and Efficacy Studies of Tetrahydrocannabinolic Acid A at Cannabinoid Receptor Types One and Two

Overview
Specialty Pharmacology
Date 2017 Sep 2
PMID 28861508
Citations 30
Authors
Affiliations
Soon will be listed here.
Abstract

biosynthesizes Δ-tetrahydrocannabinolic acid (THCA-A), which decarboxylates into Δ-tetrahydrocannabinol (THC). There is growing interest in the therapeutic use of THCA-A, but its clinical application may be hampered by instability. THCA-A lacks cannabimimetic effects; we hypothesize that it has little binding affinity at cannabinoid receptor 1 (CB). Purity of certified reference standards were tested with high performance liquid chromatography (HPLC). Binding affinity of THCA-A and THC at human (h) CB and hCB was measured in competition binding assays, using transfected HEK cells and [H]CP55,940. Efficacy at hCB and hCB was measured in a cyclic adenosine monophosphase (cAMP) assay, using a Bioluminescence Resonance Energy Transfer (BRET) biosensor. The THCA-A reagent contained 2% THC. THCA-A displayed small but measurable binding at both hCB and hCB, equating to approximate K values of 3.1μM and 12.5μM, respectively. THC showed 62-fold greater affinity at hCB and 125-fold greater affinity at hCB. In efficacy tests, THCA-A (10μM) slightly inhibited forskolin-stimulated cAMP at hCB, suggestive of weak agonist activity, and no measurable efficacy at hCB. The presence of THC in our THCA-A certified standard agrees with decarboxylation kinetics (literature reviewed herein), which indicate contamination with THC is nearly unavoidable. THCA-A binding at 10μM approximated THC binding at 200nM. We therefore suspect some of our THCA-A binding curve was artifact-from its inevitable decarboxylation into THC-and the binding affinity of THCA-A is even weaker than our estimated values. We conclude that THCA-A has little affinity or efficacy at CB or CB.

Citing Articles

The Development of Cannabinoids as Therapeutic Agents in the United States.

Murray C, Gannon B, Winsauer P, Cooper Z, Delatte M Pharmacol Rev. 2024; 76(5):915-955.

PMID: 38849155 PMC: 11331953. DOI: 10.1124/pharmrev.123.001121.


Evaluating the Metabolomic Profile and Anti-Pathogenic Properties of Species.

Monyela S, Kayoka P, Ngezimana W, Nemadodzi L Metabolites. 2024; 14(5).

PMID: 38786730 PMC: 11122914. DOI: 10.3390/metabo14050253.


An emerging trend in Novel Psychoactive Substances (NPSs): designer THC.

Caprari C, Ferri E, Vandelli M, Citti C, Cannazza G J Cannabis Res. 2024; 6(1):21.

PMID: 38702834 PMC: 11067227. DOI: 10.1186/s42238-024-00226-y.


The influence of drying and storage conditions on the volatilome and cannabinoid content of Cannabis sativa L. inflorescences.

Spadafora N, Felletti S, Chenet T, Sirangelo T, Cescon M, Catani M Anal Bioanal Chem. 2024; 416(16):3797-3809.

PMID: 38702447 PMC: 11180634. DOI: 10.1007/s00216-024-05321-w.


Behavioral observations, heart rate and cortisol monitoring in horses following multiple oral administrations of a cannabidiol containing paste (part 2/2).

Eichler F, Ehrle A, Machnik M, Jensen K, Wagner S, Baudisch N Front Vet Sci. 2024; 10:1305873.

PMID: 38234983 PMC: 10791836. DOI: 10.3389/fvets.2023.1305873.


References
1.
Rosenqvist E, Ottersen T . The crystal and molecular structure of delta-9-tetrahydrocannabinolic acid b. Acta Chem Scand B. 1975; 29(3):379-84. DOI: 10.3891/acta.chem.scand.29b-0379. View

2.
Copolovici L, Filella I, Llusia J, Niinemets U, Penuelas J . The capacity for thermal protection of photosynthetic electron transport varies for different monoterpenes in Quercus ilex. Plant Physiol. 2005; 139(1):485-96. PMC: 1203397. DOI: 10.1104/pp.105.065995. View

3.
Verhoeckx K, Korthout H, van Meeteren-Kreikamp A, Ehlert K, Wang M, van der Greef J . Unheated Cannabis sativa extracts and its major compound THC-acid have potential immuno-modulating properties not mediated by CB1 and CB2 receptor coupled pathways. Int Immunopharmacol. 2006; 6(4):656-65. DOI: 10.1016/j.intimp.2005.10.002. View

4.
Hazekamp A, Bastola K, Rashidi H, Bender J, Verpoorte R . Cannabis tea revisited: a systematic evaluation of the cannabinoid composition of cannabis tea. J Ethnopharmacol. 2007; 113(1):85-90. DOI: 10.1016/j.jep.2007.05.019. View

5.
McPartland J, Glass M, Pertwee R . Meta-analysis of cannabinoid ligand binding affinity and receptor distribution: interspecies differences. Br J Pharmacol. 2007; 152(5):583-93. PMC: 2190026. DOI: 10.1038/sj.bjp.0707399. View