» Articles » PMID: 28860875

Extraglottic Airway Devices: Technology Update

Overview
Publisher Dove Medical Press
Date 2017 Sep 2
PMID 28860875
Citations 5
Authors
Affiliations
Soon will be listed here.
Abstract

Extraglottic airway devices (EADs) have revolutionized the field of airway management. The invention of the laryngeal mask airway was a game changer, and since then, there have been several innovations to improve the EADs in design, functionality, safety and construction material. These have ranged from changes in the shape of the mask, number of cuffs and material used, like rubber, polyvinylchloride and latex. Phthalates, which were added to the construction material in order to increase device flexibility, were later omitted when this chemical was found to have serious adverse reproductive outcomes. The various designs brought out by numerous companies manufacturing EADs resulted in the addition of several devices to the airway market. These airway devices were put to use, many of them with inadequate or no evidence base regarding their efficacy and safety. To reduce the possibility of compromising the safety of the patient, the Difficult Airway Society (DAS) formed the Airway Device Evaluation Project Team (ADEPT) to strengthen the evidence base for airway equipment and vet the new extraglottic devices. A preuse careful analysis of the design and structure may help in better understanding of the functionality of a particular device. In the meantime, the search for the ideal EAD continues.

Citing Articles

Supraglottic airway devices: a powerful strategy in airway management.

Zhang K, Zhou M, Zou Z, Zhu C, Jiang R Am J Cancer Res. 2024; 14(1):16-32.

PMID: 38323274 PMC: 10839323.


Comparison of clinical performance of Baska mask and Ambu AuraGain in patients undergoing surgery: A single-blinded, randomised comparative trial.

Raman R, Prabha R, Rampal S, Tiwari T, Gautam S, Prakash R Indian J Anaesth. 2024; 67(Suppl 4):S227-S231.

PMID: 38187974 PMC: 10768903. DOI: 10.4103/ija.ija_152_23.


Clinical Performance Comparison of LMA Protector™ Cuff Pilot™ and LMA Supreme™ When Used in Anesthetized, Non-paralyzed Patients.

Chan W, Liu C Cureus. 2022; 14(3):e23176.

PMID: 35308185 PMC: 8925931. DOI: 10.7759/cureus.23176.


Evaluation of the insertion parameters and complications of the i-gel Plus airway device for maintaining patent airway during planned procedures under general anaesthesia: a protocol for a prospective multicentre cohort study.

Klementova O, Bhoday T, Werner J, Lopez A, Donaldson W, Lichnovsky E BMJ Open. 2021; 11(12):e053215.

PMID: 34930740 PMC: 8689171. DOI: 10.1136/bmjopen-2021-053215.


Comparison of the Laryngeal Mask Airways: Laryngeal Mask Airway-classic and Laryngeal Mask Airway-proseal in Children.

Bhat C, Honnannavar K, Patil M, Mudakanagoudar M Anesth Essays Res. 2018; 12(1):119-123.

PMID: 29628566 PMC: 5872847. DOI: 10.4103/aer.AER_191_17.

References
1.
Cook T, Woodall N, Harper J, Benger J . Major complications of airway management in the UK: results of the Fourth National Audit Project of the Royal College of Anaesthetists and the Difficult Airway Society. Part 2: intensive care and emergency departments. Br J Anaesth. 2011; 106(5):632-42. DOI: 10.1093/bja/aer059. View

2.
Bergold M, Kahle S, Schultzik T, Bucheler M, Byhahn C . [Intubating laryngeal tube suction disposable: Initial clinical experiences with a novel device for endotracheal intubation]. Anaesthesist. 2015; 65(1):30-35. DOI: 10.1007/s00101-015-0100-0. View

3.
Akca O, Wadhwa A, Sengupta P, Durrani J, Hanni K, Wenke M . The new perilaryngeal airway (CobraPLA) is as efficient as the laryngeal mask airway (LMA) but provides better airway sealing pressures. Anesth Analg. 2004; 99(1):272-278. PMC: 1364541. DOI: 10.1213/01.ANE.0000117003.60213.E9. View

4.
Russo S, Goetze B, Troche S, Barwing J, Quintel M, Timmermann A . LMA-ProSeal for elective postoperative care on the intensive care unit: a prospective, randomized trial. Anesthesiology. 2009; 111(1):116-21. DOI: 10.1097/ALN.0b013e3181a16303. View

5.
Brimacombe J . A proposed classification system for extraglottic airway devices. Anesthesiology. 2004; 101(2):559. DOI: 10.1097/00000542-200408000-00054. View