Evaluation of Pain During Endovenous Laser Ablation of the Great Saphenous Vein with Ultrasound-guided Femoral Nerve Block

Overview

Journal Vasc Health Risk Manag

Publisher Dove Medical Press

Specialty Cardiology & Vascular Diseases

Date 2017 Sep 2

PMID 28860790

Citations 2

Authors

Abdullah M Al Wahbi

Affiliations

Soon will be listed here.

Abstract

Background: Endoluminal laser ablation is now considered the method of choice for treating greater saphenous vein insufficiency. General anesthesia and peripheral nerve blocks with sedation have the risk of post-procedural delay in discharge and prolonged immobilization with the risk of deep vein thrombosis. The main pain experienced by patients during the procedure is during the laser ablation and the multiple needle punctures given along and around the great saphenous vein. The aim of our study was to evaluate the safety and efficacy of blocking the femoral nerve only under ultrasound-guidance without sedation, to reduce or prevent pain during injectable tumescent anesthesia in endovenous laser ablation of the greater saphenous vein.

Methods: Sixty patients in two groups underwent endovenous laser ablation for the greater saphenous vein insufficiency at an outpatient clinic. All patients received tumescent anesthesia. However, one group received a femoral nerve block (FNB) under ultrasound guidance before the procedure. All patients were asked to record the pain or discomfort, using the visual analog score, from the start of the procedure until the end of the great saphenous vein laser ablation. The length of the great saphenous vein and duration of the procedure were also recorded. The results were analyzed using statistical methods.

Results: No complications from FNB were observed. The pain associated with application of tumescent anesthesia and laser ablation was more intense in the group without an FNB ( < 0.001). There was no significant difference between the two groups in the length of the great saphenous vein or procedure duration.

Conclusion: Ultrasound-guided FNB (without other peripheral nerve blocks) is a safe, adequate, and effective option to decrease and/or eliminate the intraoperative discomfort associated with tumescent anesthesia injections and laser ablation during endoluminal laser ablation of the greater saphenous vein.

Citing Articles

Peripheral regional anaesthesia and outcomes: a narrative review of the literature from 2013 to 2023.

Admiraal M, Marhofer P, Hopkins P, Hollmann M Br J Anaesth. 2023; 132(5):1082-1096.

PMID: 37957079 PMC: 11103102. DOI: 10.1016/j.bja.2023.10.013.

Strategy to prevent nerve injury and deep vein thrombosis in radiofrequency segmental thermal ablation of the saphenous veins using a new objective pain scale.

Yamamoto K, Miwa S, Yamada T, Setozaki S, Hamuro M, Kurokawa S Phlebology. 2021; 36(8):659-664.

PMID: 33910416 PMC: 8381593. DOI: 10.1177/02683555211010513.

References

Min R, Khilnani N . Endovenous laser ablation of varicose veins. J Cardiovasc Surg (Torino). 2005; 46(4):395-405. View

Jeng C, Torrillo T, Rosenblatt M . Complications of peripheral nerve blocks. Br J Anaesth. 2010; 105 Suppl 1:i97-107. DOI: 10.1093/bja/aeq273. View

Oguzkurt L . Endovenous laser ablation for the treatment of varicose veins. Diagn Interv Radiol. 2011; 18(4):417-22. DOI: 10.4261/1305-3825.DIR.5248-11.0. View

Yilmaz S, Ceken K, Alparslan A, Sindel T, Luleci E . Endovenous laser ablation for saphenous vein insufficiency: immediate and short-term results of our first 60 procedures. Diagn Interv Radiol. 2007; 13(3):156-63. View

Hillermann T, Dullenkopf A, Joechle W, Traber J . Tumescent anaesthesia in combination with femoral nerve block for surgery of varicose veins: prilocaine 0.1% versus 0.2%. Phlebology. 2011; 26(7):292-7. DOI: 10.1258/phleb.2010.010038. View

Yilmaz S, Ceken K, Alimoglu E, Sindel T . US-guided femoral and sciatic nerve blocks for analgesia during endovenous laser ablation. Cardiovasc Intervent Radiol. 2012; 36(1):150-7. DOI: 10.1007/s00270-012-0366-4. View

van den Bos R, Neumann M, de Roos K, Nijsten T . Endovenous laser ablation-induced complications: review of the literature and new cases. Dermatol Surg. 2009; 35(8):1206-14. DOI: 10.1111/j.1524-4725.2009.01215.x. View

Vloka J, Hadzic A, Mulcare R, Lesser J, Kitain E, Thys D . Femoral and genitofemoral nerve blocks versus spinal anesthesia for outpatients undergoing long saphenous vein stripping surgery. Anesth Analg. 1997; 84(4):749-52. DOI: 10.1097/00000539-199704000-00009. View

Ozturk T, Cevikkalp E, Nizamoglu F, Ozbakkaloglu A, Topcu I . The Efficacy of Femoral Block and Unilateral Spinal Anaesthesia on Analgesia, Haemodynamics and Mobilization in Patients undergoing Endovenous Ablation in the Lower Extremity. Turk J Anaesthesiol Reanim. 2016; 44(2):91-5. PMC: 4894204. DOI: 10.5152/TJAR.2015.66933. View

10.

Evans C, Fowkes F, Ruckley C, Lee A . Prevalence of varicose veins and chronic venous insufficiency in men and women in the general population: Edinburgh Vein Study. J Epidemiol Community Health. 1999; 53(3):149-53. PMC: 1756838. DOI: 10.1136/jech.53.3.149. View

11.

Marsh P, Price B, Holdstock J, Harrison C, Whiteley M . Deep vein thrombosis (DVT) after venous thermoablation techniques: rates of endovenous heat-induced thrombosis (EHIT) and classical DVT after radiofrequency and endovenous laser ablation in a single centre. Eur J Vasc Endovasc Surg. 2010; 40(4):521-7. DOI: 10.1016/j.ejvs.2010.05.011. View

12.

Dzieciuchowicz L, Espinosa G, Grochowicz L . Evaluation of ultrasound-guided femoral nerve block in endoluminal laser ablation of the greater saphenous vein. Ann Vasc Surg. 2010; 24(7):930-4. DOI: 10.1016/j.avsg.2009.10.022. View

13.

Hoggan B, CAMERON A, Maddern G . Systematic review of endovenous laser therapy versus surgery for the treatment of saphenous varicose veins. Ann Vasc Surg. 2009; 23(2):277-87. DOI: 10.1016/j.avsg.2008.11.002. View