» Articles » PMID: 28856485

Propagation of Errors from Skull Kinematic Measurements to Finite Element Tissue Responses

Overview
Publisher Springer
Date 2017 Sep 1
PMID 28856485
Citations 9
Authors
Affiliations
Soon will be listed here.
Abstract

Real-time quantification of head impacts using wearable sensors is an appealing approach to assess concussion risk. Traditionally, sensors were evaluated for accurately measuring peak resultant skull accelerations and velocities. With growing interest in utilizing model-estimated tissue responses for injury prediction, it is important to evaluate sensor accuracy in estimating tissue response as well. Here, we quantify how sensor kinematic measurement errors can propagate into tissue response errors. Using previous instrumented mouthguard validation datasets, we found that skull kinematic measurement errors in both magnitude and direction lead to errors in tissue response magnitude and distribution. For molar design instrumented mouthguards susceptible to mandible disturbances, 150-400% error in skull kinematic measurements resulted in 100% error in regional peak tissue response. With an improved incisor design mitigating mandible disturbances, errors in skull kinematics were reduced to <50%, and several tissue response errors were reduced to <10%. Applying 30[Formula: see text] rotations to reference kinematic signals to emulate sensor transformation errors yielded below 10% error in regional peak tissue response; however, up to 20% error was observed in peak tissue response for individual finite elements. These findings demonstrate that kinematic resultant errors result in regional peak tissue response errors, while kinematic directionality errors result in tissue response distribution errors. This highlights the need to account for both kinematic magnitude and direction errors and accurately determine transformations between sensors and the skull.

Citing Articles

Neuroimaging, wearable sensors, and blood-based biomarkers reveal hyperacute changes in the brain after sub-concussive impacts.

Grijalva C, Mullins V, Michael B, Hale D, Wu L, Toosizadeh N Brain Multiphys. 2024; 5.

PMID: 38292249 PMC: 10827333. DOI: 10.1016/j.brain.2023.100086.


Injury-Reduction Programs Containing Neuromuscular Neck Exercises and the Incidence of Soccer-Related Head and Neck Injuries.

Peek K, Versteegh T, Veith S, Whalan M, Edwards S, McKay M J Athl Train. 2023; 58(6):519-527.

PMID: 36645836 PMC: 10496449. DOI: 10.4085/1062-6050-0340.22.


Analysis of relationship between loading condition and cranial cracking pattern using a three-dimensional finite element model.

Kiriyama Y, Sato Y, Muramatsu Y, Mano T, Tanaka K, Oshio K BMC Musculoskelet Disord. 2022; 23(1):310.

PMID: 35361167 PMC: 8974000. DOI: 10.1186/s12891-022-05215-x.


Time Window of Head Impact Kinematics Measurement for Calculation of Brain Strain and Strain Rate in American Football.

Liu Y, Domel A, Cecchi N, Rice E, Callan A, Raymond S Ann Biomed Eng. 2021; 49(10):2791-2804.

PMID: 34231091 DOI: 10.1007/s10439-021-02821-z.


Instantaneous Whole-Brain Strain Estimation in Dynamic Head Impact.

Ghazi K, Wu S, Zhao W, Ji S J Neurotrauma. 2020; 38(8):1023-1035.

PMID: 33126836 PMC: 8054523. DOI: 10.1089/neu.2020.7281.


References
1.
Beckwith J, Greenwald R, Chu J . Measuring head kinematics in football: correlation between the head impact telemetry system and Hybrid III headform. Ann Biomed Eng. 2011; 40(1):237-48. PMC: 3248620. DOI: 10.1007/s10439-011-0422-2. View

2.
Langlois J, Rutland-Brown W, Wald M . The epidemiology and impact of traumatic brain injury: a brief overview. J Head Trauma Rehabil. 2006; 21(5):375-8. DOI: 10.1097/00001199-200609000-00001. View

3.
Wright R, Ramesh K . An axonal strain injury criterion for traumatic brain injury. Biomech Model Mechanobiol. 2011; 11(1-2):245-60. DOI: 10.1007/s10237-011-0307-1. View

4.
Ji S, Ghadyani H, Bolander R, Beckwith J, Ford J, McAllister T . Parametric comparisons of intracranial mechanical responses from three validated finite element models of the human head. Ann Biomed Eng. 2013; 42(1):11-24. PMC: 4397967. DOI: 10.1007/s10439-013-0907-2. View

5.
Gabler L, Crandall J, Panzer M . Assessment of Kinematic Brain Injury Metrics for Predicting Strain Responses in Diverse Automotive Impact Conditions. Ann Biomed Eng. 2016; 44(12):3705-3718. DOI: 10.1007/s10439-016-1697-0. View