» Articles » PMID: 28854841

Psychosocial and Executive Function Recovery Trajectories One Year After Pediatric Traumatic Brain Injury: The Influence of Age and Injury Severity

Overview
Journal J Neurotrauma
Publisher Mary Ann Liebert
Date 2017 Sep 1
PMID 28854841
Citations 38
Authors
Affiliations
Soon will be listed here.
Abstract

Time since traumatic brain injury (TBI) and developmental stage at injury may affect the trajectory of outcomes associated with adjustment and school success. We prospectively enrolled a cohort of 519 children with either TBI or orthopedic injury (OI) age 2.5-15 years to examine children's psychosocial and executive function outcomes at 3- and 12-months post-injury. Outcome measures included the Child Behavior Checklist (CBCL), Strengths and Difficulties Questionnaire (SDQ), and Behavior Rating Inventory of Executive Function (BRIEF) ratings. Controlling for pre-injury ratings and using the OI group as the reference, children with TBI, regardless of age or injury severity, had affective, anxiety, and attention-deficit/hyperactivity disorder (ADHD) problems on the CBCL. Symptom trajectories differed both by injury severity and age at injury. Children with mild and complicated mild TBI had a decreasing anxiety trajectory, whereas children with severe TBI had increasing symptoms. Children 6-11 years of age had high ADHD and affective scores; however, the youngest children had increasing symptoms over time. On the SDQ, peer relationships and prosocial behaviors were not significantly affected by TBI but were associated with family environment. Children with severe TBI had the worst executive function scores; however, mild and complicated mild/moderate TBI groups had clinically important working memory deficits. Hispanic ethnicity and strong social capital were positively associated with multiple outcomes. Children's recovery trajectories differed by injury severity, time since injury, and developmental stage when injured. Schools need to reassess children's skills over time as new problems in behavior and learning may emerge.

Citing Articles

Examining the Implementation of the Italian Version of the Teen Online Problem-Solving Program Coupled With Remote Psychological Support: Protocol for a Randomized Controlled Trial.

Corti C, Papini M, Strazzer S, Borgatti R, Romaniello R, Poggi G JMIR Res Protoc. 2025; 14:e64178.

PMID: 39984161 PMC: 11890147. DOI: 10.2196/64178.


Sex and Age-at-Injury as Determinants of Social Behavior Outcomes After TBI.

Semple B, Mychasiuk R Adv Neurobiol. 2024; 42:205-218.

PMID: 39432044 DOI: 10.1007/978-3-031-69832-3_10.


Exploring the link among injury severity, white matter connectivity and psychosocial outcomes in pediatric TBI: a probabilistic tractography approach.

Thomas P, Bolton S, Ontiveros F, Mattson W, Vannatta K, Lo W Int J Neurosci. 2024; :1-13.

PMID: 39235059 PMC: 11880355. DOI: 10.1080/00207454.2024.2394777.


Risk of traumatic brain injury among patients with ADHD and their unaffected siblings.

Wu P, Tsai S, Hsu J, Huang K, Chen T, Pan T Pediatr Res. 2024; 96(5):1340-1346.

PMID: 38714864 PMC: 11521985. DOI: 10.1038/s41390-024-03233-0.


Differences between parent- and teacher-reported executive functioning behaviors after traumatic injuries.

Gies L, Lynch J, Bonanno K, Zhang N, Yeates K, Taylor H Child Neuropsychol. 2024; 30(8):1203-1214.

PMID: 38348682 PMC: 11323218. DOI: 10.1080/09297049.2024.2314957.


References
1.
McCauley S, Wilde E, Anderson V, Bedell G, Beers S, Campbell T . Recommendations for the use of common outcome measures in pediatric traumatic brain injury research. J Neurotrauma. 2011; 29(4):678-705. PMC: 3289848. DOI: 10.1089/neu.2011.1838. View

2.
Pierce C, Hanks R . Life satisfaction after traumatic brain injury and the World Health Organization model of disability. Am J Phys Med Rehabil. 2006; 85(11):889-98. DOI: 10.1097/01.phm.0000242615.43129.ae. View

3.
Prasad M, Swank P, Ewing-Cobbs L . Long-Term School Outcomes of Children and Adolescents With Traumatic Brain Injury. J Head Trauma Rehabil. 2016; 32(1):E24-E32. PMC: 4967046. DOI: 10.1097/HTR.0000000000000218. View

4.
Dennis M, Spiegler B, Simic N, Sinopoli K, Wilkinson A, Yeates K . Functional plasticity in childhood brain disorders: when, what, how, and whom to assess. Neuropsychol Rev. 2014; 24(4):389-408. PMC: 4231018. DOI: 10.1007/s11065-014-9261-x. View

5.
Goodman R . The Strengths and Difficulties Questionnaire: a research note. J Child Psychol Psychiatry. 1997; 38(5):581-6. DOI: 10.1111/j.1469-7610.1997.tb01545.x. View