» Articles » PMID: 28854196

Home Food Preparation Practices, Experiences and Perceptions: A Qualitative Interview Study with Photo-elicitation

Overview
Journal PLoS One
Date 2017 Aug 31
PMID 28854196
Citations 17
Authors
Affiliations
Soon will be listed here.
Abstract

Food-related choices have an important impact on health. Food preparation methods may be linked to diet and health benefits. However, the factors influencing people's food choices, and how they are shaped by food preparation experiences, are still not fully understood. We aimed to study home food preparation practices, experiences and perceptions amongst adults in North East England. A matrix was used to purposively sample participants with diverse socio-demographic characteristics. Participants developed photographic food diaries that were used as prompts during semi-structured interviews. Data were analysed using the Framework Method. Interviews were conducted with 18 adults (five men and 13 women), aged approximately 20 to 80 years, to reach data saturation. Participants' practices varied widely, from reliance on pre-prepared foods, to preparing complex meals entirely from basic ingredients. Key themes emerged regarding the cook (identity), the task (process of cooking), and the context (situational drivers). Resources, in terms of time, money and facilities, were also underpinning influences on food preparation. Participants' practices were determined by both personal motivations to cook, and the influence of others, and generally reflected compromises between varied competing demands and challenges in life. Most people appeared to be overall content with their food preparation behaviour, though ideally aspired to cook more frequently, using basic ingredients. This often seemed to be driven by social desirability. Home food preparation is complex, with heterogeneous practices, experiences and perceptions both between individuals and within the same individual over time, according to shifting priorities and circumstances. Generalisability of these findings may be limited by the regional participant sample; however the results support and build upon previous research. Focussing interventions on life transition points at which priorities and circumstances change, with careful targeting to stimulate personal motivation and social norms, may prove effective in encouraging home food preparation.

Citing Articles

Personalized Culinary Medicine: Qualitative Analyses of Perceptions from Participants in Action and Contemplation Stages of Change Through a One-Year Bi-Center Randomized Controlled Trial.

Finkelstein A, Budd M, Gray B, Mirsky J, Tirosh A, Polak R Nutrients. 2025; 17(4).

PMID: 40005034 PMC: 11858461. DOI: 10.3390/nu17040704.


Development of the 10-question household foodwork interactional assessment questionnaire (FIA-Q10).

Cahill L, Kirkpatrick S, Mah C, Protudjer J, Kendell C, Jung M Int J Behav Nutr Phys Act. 2024; 21(1):135.

PMID: 39609806 PMC: 11603983. DOI: 10.1186/s12966-024-01671-x.


Identifying High-Priority Populations for Dietary Salt Reduction Using the TARPARE Model: A Cross-Sectional Study.

Abe T, Kitayuguchi J, Hamano T, Yamasaki M, Yano S, Isomura M Inquiry. 2024; 61:469580241282776.

PMID: 39305095 PMC: 11418442. DOI: 10.1177/00469580241282776.


Exploring the world of food with families: perspectives of low-income families on factors influencing their food choices.

Vaughan E, Spyreli E, McKinley M, Hennessy M, Woodside J, Kelly C Public Health Nutr. 2024; 27(1):e53.

PMID: 38234109 PMC: 10882528. DOI: 10.1017/S136898002400020X.


Using Mobile Ecological Momentary Assessment to Understand Consumption and Context Around Online Food Delivery Use: Pilot Feasibility and Acceptability Study.

Jia S, Allman-Farinelli M, Roy R, Phongsavan P, Hyun K, Gibson A JMIR Mhealth Uhealth. 2023; 11:e49135.

PMID: 38019563 PMC: 10719819. DOI: 10.2196/49135.


References
1.
Oliffe J, Bottorff J, Kelly M, Halpin M . Analyzing participant produced photographs from an ethnographic study of fatherhood and smoking. Res Nurs Health. 2008; 31(5):529-39. DOI: 10.1002/nur.20269. View

2.
Tong A, Sainsbury P, Craig J . Consolidated criteria for reporting qualitative research (COREQ): a 32-item checklist for interviews and focus groups. Int J Qual Health Care. 2007; 19(6):349-57. DOI: 10.1093/intqhc/mzm042. View

3.
Lim S, Vos T, Flaxman A, Danaei G, Shibuya K, Adair-Rohani H . A comparative risk assessment of burden of disease and injury attributable to 67 risk factors and risk factor clusters in 21 regions, 1990-2010: a systematic analysis for the Global Burden of Disease Study 2010. Lancet. 2012; 380(9859):2224-60. PMC: 4156511. DOI: 10.1016/S0140-6736(12)61766-8. View

4.
Gale N, Heath G, Cameron E, Rashid S, Redwood S . Using the framework method for the analysis of qualitative data in multi-disciplinary health research. BMC Med Res Methodol. 2013; 13:117. PMC: 3848812. DOI: 10.1186/1471-2288-13-117. View

5.
Chu Y, Storey K, Veugelers P . Involvement in meal preparation at home is associated with better diet quality among Canadian children. J Nutr Educ Behav. 2013; 46(4):304-308. DOI: 10.1016/j.jneb.2013.10.003. View