» Articles » PMID: 28851888

The Prognostic 97 Chemoresponse Gene Signature in Ovarian Cancer

Overview
Journal Sci Rep
Specialty Science
Date 2017 Aug 31
PMID 28851888
Citations 19
Authors
Affiliations
Soon will be listed here.
Abstract

Patient diagnosis and care would be significantly improved by understanding the mechanisms underlying platinum and taxane resistance in ovarian cancer. Here, we aim to establish a gene signature that can identify molecular pathways/transcription factors involved in ovarian cancer progression, poor clinical outcome, and chemotherapy resistance. To validate the robustness of the gene signature, a meta-analysis approach was applied to 1,020 patients from 7 datasets. A 97-gene signature was identified as an independent predictor of patient survival in association with other clinicopathological factors in univariate [hazard ratio (HR): 3.0, 95% Confidence Interval (CI) 1.66-5.44, p = 2.7E-4] and multivariate [HR: 2.88, 95% CI 1.57-5.2, p = 0.001] analyses. Subset analyses demonstrated that the signature could predict patients who would attain complete or partial remission or no-response to first-line chemotherapy. Pathway analyses revealed that the signature was regulated by HIF1α and TP53 and included nine HIF1α-regulated genes, which were highly expressed in non-responders and partial remission patients than in complete remission patients. We present the 97-gene signature as an accurate prognostic predictor of overall survival and chemoresponse. Our signature also provides information on potential candidate target genes for future treatment efforts in ovarian cancer.

Citing Articles

The Progression and Prospects of the Gene Expression Profiling in Ovarian Epithelial Cancer.

Srinivasamurthy B, Ramamoorthi S Gynecol Minim Invasive Ther. 2024; 13(3):141-145.

PMID: 39184260 PMC: 11343359. DOI: 10.4103/gmit.gmit_13_23.


Residual ANTXR1+ myofibroblasts after chemotherapy inhibit anti-tumor immunity via YAP1 signaling pathway.

Licaj M, Mhaidly R, Kieffer Y, Croizer H, Bonneau C, Meng A Nat Commun. 2024; 15(1):1312.

PMID: 38346978 PMC: 10861537. DOI: 10.1038/s41467-024-45595-3.


A prognostic model for ovarian neoplasms established by an integrated analysis of 1580 transcriptomic profiles.

Hua Y, Cai D, Shirley C, Mo S, Chen R, Gao F Sci Rep. 2023; 13(1):19429.

PMID: 37940688 PMC: 10632395. DOI: 10.1038/s41598-023-45410-x.


Molecular Management of High-Grade Serous Ovarian Carcinoma.

Punzon-Jimenez P, Lago V, Domingo S, Simon C, Mas A Int J Mol Sci. 2022; 23(22).

PMID: 36430255 PMC: 9692799. DOI: 10.3390/ijms232213777.


Bioinformatics: From NGS Data to Biological Complexity in Variant Detection and Oncological Clinical Practice.

Dotolo S, Esposito Abate R, Roma C, Guido D, Preziosi A, Tropea B Biomedicines. 2022; 10(9).

PMID: 36140175 PMC: 9495893. DOI: 10.3390/biomedicines10092074.


References
1.
Tan T, Miow Q, Huang R, Wong M, Ye J, Lau J . Functional genomics identifies five distinct molecular subtypes with clinical relevance and pathways for growth control in epithelial ovarian cancer. EMBO Mol Med. 2013; 5(7):1051-66. PMC: 3721473. DOI: 10.1002/emmm.201201823. View

2.
Mahner S, Baasch C, Schwarz J, Hein S, Wolber L, Janicke F . C-Fos expression is a molecular predictor of progression and survival in epithelial ovarian carcinoma. Br J Cancer. 2008; 99(8):1269-75. PMC: 2570515. DOI: 10.1038/sj.bjc.6604650. View

3.
Cannistra S . Cancer of the ovary. N Engl J Med. 2004; 351(24):2519-29. DOI: 10.1056/NEJMra041842. View

4.
Denkert C, Budczies J, Darb-Esfahani S, Gyorffy B, Sehouli J, Konsgen D . A prognostic gene expression index in ovarian cancer - validation across different independent data sets. J Pathol. 2009; 218(2):273-80. DOI: 10.1002/path.2547. View

5.
Martins F, de Santiago I, Trinh A, Xian J, Guo A, Sayal K . Combined image and genomic analysis of high-grade serous ovarian cancer reveals PTEN loss as a common driver event and prognostic classifier. Genome Biol. 2015; 15(12):526. PMC: 4268857. DOI: 10.1186/s13059-014-0526-8. View