» Articles » PMID: 28851345

Ethical Acceptability of Offering Financial Incentives for Taking Antipsychotic Depot Medication: Patients' and Clinicians' Perspectives After a 12-month Randomized Controlled Trial

Overview
Journal BMC Psychiatry
Publisher Biomed Central
Specialty Psychiatry
Date 2017 Aug 31
PMID 28851345
Citations 9
Authors
Affiliations
Soon will be listed here.
Abstract

Background: A randomized controlled trial 'Money for Medication'(M4M) was conducted in which patients were offered financial incentives for taking antipsychotic depot medication. This study assessed the attitudes and ethical considerations of patients and clinicians who participated in this trial.

Methods: Three mental healthcare institutions in secondary psychiatric care in the Netherlands participated in this study. Patients (n = 169), 18-65 years, diagnosed with schizophrenia, schizoaffective disorder or another psychotic disorder who had been prescribed antipsychotic depot medication, were randomly assigned to receive 12 months of either treatment as usual plus a financial reward for each depot of medication received (intervention group) or treatment as usual alone (control group). Structured questionnaires were administered after the 12-month intervention period. Data were available for 133 patients (69 control and 64 intervention) and for 97 clinicians.

Results: Patients (88%) and clinicians (81%) indicated that financial incentives were a good approach to improve medication adherence. Ethical concerns were categorized according to the four-principles approach (autonomy, beneficence, non-maleficence, and justice). Patients and clinicians alike mentioned various advantages of M4M in clinical practice, such as increased medication adherence and improved illness insight; but also disadvantages such as reduced intrinsic motivation, loss of autonomy and feelings of dependence.

Conclusions: Overall, patients evaluated financial incentives as an effective method of improving medication adherence and were willing to accept this reward during clinical treatment. Clinicians were also positive about the use of this intervention in daily practice. Ethical concerns are discussed in terms of patient autonomy, beneficence, non-maleficence and justice. We conclude that this intervention is ethically acceptable under certain conditions, and that further research is necessary to clarify issues of benefit, motivation and the preferred size and duration of the incentive.

Trial Registration: Nederlands Trial Register, number NTR2350 .

Citing Articles

Evaluating Financial Incentives as a Tool to Increase Medication Adherence for Patients with Type 2 Diabetes Mellitus: A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis.

Winberg D, Tang T, Ramsey Z, Bazzano A, Nauman E, Li J Diabetes Ther. 2025; 16(3):527-545.

PMID: 39928226 PMC: 11868475. DOI: 10.1007/s13300-025-01694-y.


Operationalizing Equity, Inclusion, and Access in Research Practice at a Large Academic Institution.

Britez Ferrante E, Blady S, Sheu D, Maitra M, Drakes J, Lieberman A J Gen Intern Med. 2024; 39(6):1037-1047.

PMID: 38302812 PMC: 11074076. DOI: 10.1007/s11606-023-08539-z.


Take patients seriously when they say financial incentives help with adherence.

Hodson N, Majid M, Vlaev I, Singh S BJPsych Bull. 2023; 47(3):149-152.

PMID: 36796418 PMC: 10214431. DOI: 10.1192/bjb.2022.76.


Regular support provided by dermatological nurses improves outcomes in patients with psoriasis treated with topical drugs: a randomized controlled trial.

Svendsen M, Feldman S, Mejldal A, Moller S, Kongstad L, Andersen K Clin Exp Dermatol. 2022; 47(12):2208-2221.

PMID: 35973788 PMC: 10092433. DOI: 10.1111/ced.15370.


Do financial incentives increase mental health treatment engagement? A meta-analysis.

Khazanov G, Morris P, Beed A, Jager-Hyman S, Myhre K, McKay J J Consult Clin Psychol. 2022; 90(6):528-544.

PMID: 35771513 PMC: 10603786. DOI: 10.1037/ccp0000737.


References
1.
Staring A, Van der Gaag M, Mulder C . Schizophrenia and antipsychotic medication--better adherence, better outcomes?. Schizophr Res. 2013; 151(1-3):296-7. DOI: 10.1016/j.schres.2013.10.035. View

2.
Priebe S, Yeeles K, Bremner S, Lauber C, Eldridge S, Ashby D . Effectiveness of financial incentives to improve adherence to maintenance treatment with antipsychotics: cluster randomised controlled trial. BMJ. 2013; 347:f5847. PMC: 3805491. DOI: 10.1136/bmj.f5847. View

3.
Priebe S, Sinclair J, Burton A, Marougka S, Larsen J, Firn M . Acceptability of offering financial incentives to achieve medication adherence in patients with severe mental illness: a focus group study. J Med Ethics. 2010; 36(8):463-8. PMC: 2976611. DOI: 10.1136/jme.2009.035071. View

4.
Valenstein M, Ganoczy D, McCarthy J, Kim H, Lee T, Blow F . Antipsychotic adherence over time among patients receiving treatment for schizophrenia: a retrospective review. J Clin Psychiatry. 2006; 67(10):1542-50. DOI: 10.4088/jcp.v67n1008. View

5.
Nelson R, Beauchamp T, Miller V, Reynolds W, Ittenbach R, Luce M . The concept of voluntary consent. Am J Bioeth. 2011; 11(8):6-16. DOI: 10.1080/15265161.2011.583318. View