» Articles » PMID: 28848473

Home Language Will Not Take Care of Itself: Vocabulary Knowledge in Trilingual Children in the United Kingdom

Overview
Journal Front Psychol
Date 2017 Aug 30
PMID 28848473
Citations 6
Authors
Affiliations
Soon will be listed here.
Abstract

Language input is crucial for language acquisition and especially for children's vocabulary size. Bilingual children receive reduced input in each of their languages, compared to monolinguals, and are reported to have smaller vocabularies, at least in one of their languages. Vocabulary acquisition in trilingual children has been largely understudied; only a few case studies have been published so far. Moreover, trilingual language acquisition in children has been rarely contrasted with language outcomes of bilingual and monolingual peers. We present a comparison of trilingual, bilingual, and monolingual children (total of 56 participants, aged 4;5-6;7, matched one-to-one for age, gender, and non-verbal IQ) in regard to their receptive and expressive vocabulary (measured by standardized tests), and relative frequency of input in each language (measured by parental report). The monolingual children were speakers of Polish or English, while the bilinguals and trilinguals were migrant children living in the United Kingdom, speaking English as a majority language and Polish as a home language. The trilinguals had another (third) language at home. For the majority language, English, no differences were found across the three groups, either in the receptive or productive vocabulary. The groups differed, however, in their performance in Polish, the home language. The trilinguals had lower receptive vocabulary than the monolinguals, and lower productive vocabulary compared to the monolinguals. The trilinguals showed similar lexical knowledge to the bilinguals. The bilinguals demonstrated lower scores than the monolinguals, but only in productive vocabulary. The data on reported language input show that input in English in bilingual and trilingual groups is similar, but the bilinguals outscore the trilinguals in relative frequency of Polish input. Overall, the results suggest that in the majority language, multilingual children may develop lexical skills similar to those of their monolingual peers. However, their minority language is weaker: the trilinguals scored lower than the Polish monolinguals on both receptive and expressive vocabulary tests, and the bilinguals showed reduced expressive knowledge but leveled out with the Polish monolinguals on receptive vocabulary. The results should encourage parents of migrant children to support home language(s), if the languages are to be retained in a longer perspective.

Citing Articles

Quebec-based parents' concerns regarding their children's multilingual development.

Quirk E, Brouillard M, Ahooja A, Ballinger S, Polka L, Byers-Heinlein K Int J Multiling. 2024; 21(3):1476-1493.

PMID: 39055771 PMC: 11268824. DOI: 10.1080/14790718.2023.2184475.


Polish-German preschoolers develop and use heritage Polish differently depending on whether they heard German from birth or not.

De Houwer A Front Psychol. 2023; 14:1080122.

PMID: 37057150 PMC: 10086410. DOI: 10.3389/fpsyg.2023.1080122.


Child Heritage Language Development: An Interplay Between Cross-Linguistic Influence and Language-External Factors.

Meir N, Janssen B Front Psychol. 2021; 12:651730.

PMID: 34867570 PMC: 8632657. DOI: 10.3389/fpsyg.2021.651730.


Multilingual toddlers' vocabulary development in two languages: Comparing bilinguals and trilinguals.

Cote S, Gonzalez-Barrero A, Byers-Heinlein K J Child Lang. 2021; 49(1):114-130.

PMID: 33563342 PMC: 8353012. DOI: 10.1017/S030500092000077X.


Factors Modifying the Amount of Neuroanatomical Overlap between Languages in Bilinguals-A Systematic Review of Neurosurgical Language Mapping Studies.

Polczynska M, Bookheimer S Brain Sci. 2020; 10(12).

PMID: 33333820 PMC: 7765203. DOI: 10.3390/brainsci10120983.


References
1.
Bialystok E, Luk G, Peets K, Yang S . Receptive vocabulary differences in monolingual and bilingual children. Biling (Camb Engl). 2015; 13(4):525-531. PMC: 4349351. DOI: 10.1017/S1366728909990423. View

2.
Blom E, Bosma E . The sooner the better? An investigation into the role of age of onset and its relation with transfer and exposure in bilingual Frisian-Dutch children. J Child Lang. 2016; 43(3):581-607. DOI: 10.1017/S0305000915000574. View

3.
Gollan T, Starr J, Ferreira V . More than use it or lose it: the number-of-speakers effect on heritage language proficiency. Psychon Bull Rev. 2014; 22(1):147-55. PMC: 4272335. DOI: 10.3758/s13423-014-0649-7. View

4.
Rowe M . A longitudinal investigation of the role of quantity and quality of child-directed speech in vocabulary development. Child Dev. 2012; 83(5):1762-74. PMC: 3440540. DOI: 10.1111/j.1467-8624.2012.01805.x. View

5.
Hoff E . Interpreting the early language trajectories of children from low-SES and language minority homes: implications for closing achievement gaps. Dev Psychol. 2012; 49(1):4-14. PMC: 4061698. DOI: 10.1037/a0027238. View