» Articles » PMID: 28842243

The Differential Effects of Unihemispheric and Bihemispheric TDCS over the Inferior Frontal Gyrus on Proactive Control

Overview
Journal Neurosci Res
Publisher Elsevier
Specialty Neurology
Date 2017 Aug 27
PMID 28842243
Citations 10
Authors
Affiliations
Soon will be listed here.
Abstract

This study examined the effects of bihemispheric and unihemispheric transcranial Direct Current Stimulation (tDCS) over the inferior frontal gyrus (IFG) on proactive control. Sixteen participants were randomized to receive (i) bihemispheric tDCS, with a 35cm anodal electrode of the right IFG and a 35cm cathode electrode of left IFG or (ii) unihemispheric tDCS, with a 35cm anodal electrode of the right IFG and a 100cm electrode of the left IFG or (iii) sham tDCS, while performing a prepotent inhibition task. There were significant speed-accuracy tradeoff effects in terms of switch costs: unihemispheric tDCS significantly decreased the accuracy when compared to bihemispheric, and sham tDCS, while increased response time when comparing to bihemispheric and sham tDCS. The computational model showed a symmetrical field intensity for the bihemispheric tDCS montage, and an asymmetrical for the unihemispheric tDCS montage. This study confirms that unihemispheric tDCS over the rIFG has a significant impact on response inhibition. The lack of results of bihemispheric tDCS brings two important findings for this study: (i) left IFG seems to be also critically associated with inhibitory response control, and (ii) these results highlight the importance of considering the dual effects of tDCS when choosing the electrode montage.

Citing Articles

Effects of transcranial direct current stimulation on modulating executive functions in healthy populations: a systematic review and meta-analysis.

You G, Pan X, Li J, Zhao S Front Hum Neurosci. 2024; 18:1485037.

PMID: 39734667 PMC: 11671507. DOI: 10.3389/fnhum.2024.1485037.


Neurobiological Effects of Transcranial Direct Current Stimulation over the Inferior Frontal Gyrus: A Systematic Review on Cognitive Enhancement in Healthy and Neurological Adults.

Di Fuccio R, Lardone A, De Luca M, Ali L, Limone P, Marangolo P Biomedicines. 2024; 12(6).

PMID: 38927353 PMC: 11200721. DOI: 10.3390/biomedicines12061146.


Transcranial Direct Current Stimulation Decreases P3 Amplitude and Inherent Delta Activity during a Waiting Impulsivity Paradigm: Crossover Study.

Mendes A, Galdo-Alvarez S, Lema A, Carvalho S, Leite J Brain Sci. 2024; 14(2).

PMID: 38391742 PMC: 10887229. DOI: 10.3390/brainsci14020168.


Portable Neuroimaging-Guided Noninvasive Brain Stimulation of the Cortico-Cerebello-Thalamo-Cortical Loop-Hypothesis and Theory in Cannabis Use Disorder.

Walia P, Ghosh A, Singh S, Dutta A Brain Sci. 2022; 12(4).

PMID: 35447977 PMC: 9027826. DOI: 10.3390/brainsci12040445.


Enriched Rehabilitation Improves Gait Disorder and Cognitive Function in Parkinson's Disease: A Randomized Clinical Trial.

Wang X, Chen L, Zhou H, Xu Y, Zhang H, Yang W Front Neurosci. 2021; 15:733311.

PMID: 34924926 PMC: 8674725. DOI: 10.3389/fnins.2021.733311.


References
1.
Morales-Quezada L, Leite J, Carvalho S, Castillo-Saavedra L, Cosmo C, Fregni F . Behavioral effects of transcranial pulsed current stimulation (tPCS): Speed-accuracy tradeoff in attention switching task. Neurosci Res. 2016; 109:48-53. DOI: 10.1016/j.neures.2016.01.009. View

2.
Yavari F, Shahbabaie A, Leite J, Carvalho S, Ekhtiari H, Fregni F . Noninvasive brain stimulation for addiction medicine: From monitoring to modulation. Prog Brain Res. 2016; 224:371-99. DOI: 10.1016/bs.pbr.2015.08.007. View

3.
Bikson M, Rahman A, Datta A . Computational models of transcranial direct current stimulation. Clin EEG Neurosci. 2012; 43(3):176-83. DOI: 10.1177/1550059412445138. View

4.
Kelly A, Hester R, Murphy K, Javitt D, Foxe J, Garavan H . Prefrontal-subcortical dissociations underlying inhibitory control revealed by event-related fMRI. Eur J Neurosci. 2004; 19(11):3105-12. DOI: 10.1111/j.0953-816X.2004.03429.x. View

5.
Aron A, Robbins T, Poldrack R . Inhibition and the right inferior frontal cortex. Trends Cogn Sci. 2004; 8(4):170-7. DOI: 10.1016/j.tics.2004.02.010. View