Radiology and Enterprise Medical Imaging Extensions (REMIX)

Overview

Journal J Digit Imaging

Publisher Springer

Specialties Medical Informatics
Radiology

Date 2017 Aug 26

PMID 28840365

Citations 5

Authors

Barbaros S Erdal

Luciano M Prevedello

Songyue Qian

Mutlu Demirer

Kevin Little

John Ryu

Thomas ODonnell

Richard D White

Affiliations

Soon will be listed here.

Abstract

Radiology and Enterprise Medical Imaging Extensions (REMIX) is a platform originally designed to both support the medical imaging-driven clinical and clinical research operational needs of Department of Radiology of The Ohio State University Wexner Medical Center. REMIX accommodates the storage and handling of "big imaging data," as needed for large multi-disciplinary cancer-focused programs. The evolving REMIX platform contains an array of integrated tools/software packages for the following: (1) server and storage management; (2) image reconstruction; (3) digital pathology; (4) de-identification; (5) business intelligence; (6) texture analysis; and (7) artificial intelligence. These capabilities, along with documentation and guidance, explaining how to interact with a commercial system (e.g., PACS, EHR, commercial database) that currently exists in clinical environments, are to be made freely available.

Citing Articles

Temporal Relationship-Aware Treadmill Exercise Test Analysis Network for Coronary Artery Disease Diagnosis.

Wei J, Pan B, Gan Y, Li X, Liu D, Sang B Sensors (Basel). 2024; 24(9).

PMID: 38732812 PMC: 11085865. DOI: 10.3390/s24092705.

Report of the Medical Image De-Identification (MIDI) Task Group - Best Practices and Recommendations.

Clunie D, Flanders A, Taylor A, Erickson B, Bialecki B, Brundage D ArXiv. 2023; .

PMID: 37033463 PMC: 10081345.

Optimizing Primary Healthcare in Hong Kong: Strategies for the Successful Integration of Radiology Services.

Chow C, Shum J, Hui K, Lin A, Chu E Cureus. 2023; 15(4):e37022.

PMID: 37016673 PMC: 10066850. DOI: 10.7759/cureus.37022.

Interventional Radiology ex-machina: impact of Artificial Intelligence on practice.

Gurgitano M, Angileri S, Roda G, Liguori A, Pandolfi M, Ierardi A Radiol Med. 2021; 126(7):998-1006.

PMID: 33861421 PMC: 8050998. DOI: 10.1007/s11547-021-01351-x.

Myths and facts about artificial intelligence: why machine- and deep-learning will not replace interventional radiologists.

Pesapane F, Tantrige P, Patella F, Biondetti P, Nicosia L, Ianniello A Med Oncol. 2020; 37(5):40.

PMID: 32246300 DOI: 10.1007/s12032-020-01368-8.

References

Ma D, Gulani V, Seiberlich N, Liu K, Sunshine J, Duerk J . Magnetic resonance fingerprinting. Nature. 2013; 495(7440):187-92. PMC: 3602925. DOI: 10.1038/nature11971. View

Therasse P, Arbuck S, Eisenhauer E, Wanders J, Kaplan R, Rubinstein L . New guidelines to evaluate the response to treatment in solid tumors. European Organization for Research and Treatment of Cancer, National Cancer Institute of the United States, National Cancer Institute of Canada. J Natl Cancer Inst. 2000; 92(3):205-16. DOI: 10.1093/jnci/92.3.205. View

Wang S, Summers R . Machine learning and radiology. Med Image Anal. 2012; 16(5):933-51. PMC: 3372692. DOI: 10.1016/j.media.2012.02.005. View

Gillies R, Kinahan P, Hricak H . Radiomics: Images Are More than Pictures, They Are Data. Radiology. 2015; 278(2):563-77. PMC: 4734157. DOI: 10.1148/radiol.2015151169. View

Ozkan E, West A, Dedelow J, Chu B, Zhao W, Yildiz V . CT Gray-Level Texture Analysis as a Quantitative Imaging Biomarker of Epidermal Growth Factor Receptor Mutation Status in Adenocarcinoma of the Lung. AJR Am J Roentgenol. 2015; 205(5):1016-25. DOI: 10.2214/AJR.14.14147. View

Ziegler A, Kohler T, Proksa R . Noise and resolution in images reconstructed with FBP and OSC algorithms for CT. Med Phys. 2007; 34(2):585-98. DOI: 10.1118/1.2409481. View

Awad J, Owrangi A, Villemaire L, ORiordan E, Parraga G, Fenster A . Three-dimensional lung tumor segmentation from x-ray computed tomography using sparse field active models. Med Phys. 2012; 39(2):851-65. DOI: 10.1118/1.3676687. View

Koh D, Scurr E, Collins D, Kanber B, Norman A, Leach M . Predicting response of colorectal hepatic metastasis: value of pretreatment apparent diffusion coefficients. AJR Am J Roentgenol. 2007; 188(4):1001-8. DOI: 10.2214/AJR.06.0601. View

Prevedello L, Erdal B, Ryu J, Little K, Demirer M, Qian S . Automated Critical Test Findings Identification and Online Notification System Using Artificial Intelligence in Imaging. Radiology. 2017; 285(3):923-931. DOI: 10.1148/radiol.2017162664. View

10.

Lencioni R, Llovet J . Modified RECIST (mRECIST) assessment for hepatocellular carcinoma. Semin Liver Dis. 2010; 30(1):52-60. DOI: 10.1055/s-0030-1247132. View

11.

Tiwari P, Rosen M, Madabhushi A . A hierarchical spectral clustering and nonlinear dimensionality reduction scheme for detection of prostate cancer from magnetic resonance spectroscopy (MRS). Med Phys. 2009; 36(9):3927-39. PMC: 2738739. DOI: 10.1118/1.3180955. View

12.

Clark K, Vendt B, Smith K, Freymann J, Kirby J, Koppel P . The Cancer Imaging Archive (TCIA): maintaining and operating a public information repository. J Digit Imaging. 2013; 26(6):1045-57. PMC: 3824915. DOI: 10.1007/s10278-013-9622-7. View

13.

Prakash P, Kalra M, Kambadakone A, Pien H, Hsieh J, Blake M . Reducing abdominal CT radiation dose with adaptive statistical iterative reconstruction technique. Invest Radiol. 2010; 45(4):202-10. DOI: 10.1097/RLI.ob013e3181dzfeec. View

14.

Kanal K, Stewart B, Kolokythas O, Shuman W . Impact of operator-selected image noise index and reconstruction slice thickness on patient radiation dose in 64-MDCT. AJR Am J Roentgenol. 2007; 189(1):219-25. DOI: 10.2214/AJR.06.1524. View

15.

Wang X . Cancer Moonshot 2020: a new march of clinical and translational medicine. Clin Transl Med. 2016; 5(1):11. PMC: 4786514. DOI: 10.1186/s40169-016-0091-8. View

16.

Bruix J, Sherman M, Llovet J, Beaugrand M, Lencioni R, Burroughs A . Clinical management of hepatocellular carcinoma. Conclusions of the Barcelona-2000 EASL conference. European Association for the Study of the Liver. J Hepatol. 2001; 35(3):421-30. DOI: 10.1016/s0168-8278(01)00130-1. View

17.

Wahl R, Jacene H, Kasamon Y, Lodge M . From RECIST to PERCIST: Evolving Considerations for PET response criteria in solid tumors. J Nucl Med. 2009; 50 Suppl 1:122S-50S. PMC: 2755245. DOI: 10.2967/jnumed.108.057307. View

18.

Clarke L, Nordstrom R, Zhang H, Tandon P, Zhang Y, Redmond G . The Quantitative Imaging Network: NCI's Historical Perspective and Planned Goals. Transl Oncol. 2014; 7(1):1-4. PMC: 3998696. DOI: 10.1593/tlo.13832. View

19.

Kurland B, Gerstner E, Mountz J, Schwartz L, Ryan C, Graham M . Promise and pitfalls of quantitative imaging in oncology clinical trials. Magn Reson Imaging. 2012; 30(9):1301-12. PMC: 3466405. DOI: 10.1016/j.mri.2012.06.009. View

20.

Erdal B, Crouser E, Yildiz V, King M, Patterson A, Knopp M . Quantitative computerized two-point correlation analysis of lung CT scans correlates with pulmonary function in pulmonary sarcoidosis. Chest. 2012; 142(6):1589-1597. PMC: 4511386. DOI: 10.1378/chest.11-2027. View