» Articles » PMID: 28840295

Liver Function, Quantified by LiMAx Test, After Major Abdominal Surgery. Comparison Between Open and Laparoscopic Approach

Overview
Journal World J Surg
Publisher Wiley
Specialty General Surgery
Date 2017 Aug 26
PMID 28840295
Citations 4
Authors
Affiliations
Soon will be listed here.
Abstract

Introduction: Major abdominal surgery may lead to a systemic inflammatory response (SIRS) with a risk of organ failure. One possible trigger for a postoperative hepatic dysfunction is an altered hepatic blood flow during SIRS, resulting in a decreased oxygen delivery. This pilot study investigated the role of liver dysfunction measured by the LiMAx test after major abdominal surgery, focussing on open and laparoscopic surgical approaches.

Methods: We prospectively investigated 25 patients (7 females and 18 males, age range 55-72 years) scheduled for upper abdominal surgery. The LiMAx test, ICG-PDR and duplex sonography were carried out preoperatively, followed by postoperative days (PODs) 1, 3, 5 and 10. Laboratory parameters and clinical parameters were measured daily. Clinical outcome parameters were examined at the end of treatment. The population was divided into group A (laparotomy) versus group B (laparoscopy).

Results: LiMAx values decreased significantly on POD 1 (290 µg/kg/h, P < 0.001), followed by a significant increase at POD 3 (348 µg/kg/h, P = 0.013). Only INR showed a significant increase on POD 1 (1.26, P < 0.001). Duplex sonography and ICG-PDR revealed a hyper-dynamic liver blood flow. No differences between group A and B were found.

Conclusions: Hepatic dysfunction after major abdominal surgery is evident and underestimated. The LiMAx test provides an adequate tool to determine liver dysfunction. Open and laparoscopic approaches appeared similar in terms of liver dysfunction and postoperative SIRS.

Citing Articles

Immunomodulation by Hemoadsorption-Changes in Hepatic Biotransformation Capacity in Sepsis and Septic Shock: A Prospective Study.

Praxenthaler J, Schwier E, Altmann S, Kirchner C, Bialas J, Henzler D Biomedicines. 2022; 10(10).

PMID: 36289602 PMC: 9598581. DOI: 10.3390/biomedicines10102340.


The LiMAx Test as Selection Criteria in Minimally Invasive Liver Surgery.

Rahimli M, Perrakis A, Gumbs A, Andric M, Al-Madhi S, Arend J J Clin Med. 2022; 11(11).

PMID: 35683406 PMC: 9181538. DOI: 10.3390/jcm11113018.


Pharmacokinetics of tigecycline in critically ill patients with liver failure defined by maximal liver function capacity test (LiMAx).

Alraish R, Wicha S, Frey O, Roehr A, Pratschke J, Stockmann M Ann Intensive Care. 2020; 10(1):106.

PMID: 32754775 PMC: 7403243. DOI: 10.1186/s13613-020-00707-2.


Randomized clinical trial comparing liver resection with and without perioperative assessment of liver function.

Stockmann M, Vondran F, Fahrner R, Tautenhahn H, Mittler J, Bektas H BJS Open. 2018; 2(5):301-309.

PMID: 30263981 PMC: 6156169. DOI: 10.1002/bjs5.81.

References
1.
Marik P, Flemmer M . The immune response to surgery and trauma: Implications for treatment. J Trauma Acute Care Surg. 2012; 73(4):801-8. DOI: 10.1097/TA.0b013e318265cf87. View

2.
HEINTZ R, Svensson C, Stoeckel K, Powers G, Lalka D . Indocyanine green: pharmacokinetics in the rabbit and relevant studies of its stability and purity. J Pharm Sci. 1986; 75(4):398-402. DOI: 10.1002/jps.2600750417. View

3.
Fink-Neuboeck N, Lindenmann J, Bajric S, Maier A, Riedl R, Weinberg A . Clinical impact of interleukin 6 as a predictive biomarker in the early diagnosis of postoperative systemic inflammatory response syndrome after major thoracic surgery: A prospective clinical trial. Surgery. 2016; 160(2):443-53. DOI: 10.1016/j.surg.2016.04.004. View

4.
Sakka S, Reinhart K, Meier-Hellmann A . Prognostic value of the indocyanine green plasma disappearance rate in critically ill patients. Chest. 2002; 122(5):1715-20. DOI: 10.1378/chest.122.5.1715. View

5.
van den Broek W, Makay O, Berends F, Yuan J, Houdijk A, Meijer S . Laparoscopically assisted transhiatal resection for malignancies of the distal esophagus. Surg Endosc. 2004; 18(5):812-7. DOI: 10.1007/s00464-003-9173-y. View