» Articles » PMID: 28839915

Domestication As a Model System for the Extended Evolutionary Synthesis

Overview
Journal Interface Focus
Specialty Biology
Date 2017 Aug 26
PMID 28839915
Citations 17
Authors
Affiliations
Soon will be listed here.
Abstract

One of the challenges in evaluating arguments for extending the conceptual framework of evolutionary biology involves the identification of a tractable model system that allows for an assessment of the core assumptions of the extended evolutionary synthesis (EES). The domestication of plants and animals by humans provides one such case study opportunity. Here, I consider domestication as a model system for exploring major tenets of the EES. First I discuss the novel insights that niche construction theory (NCT, one of the pillars of the EES) provides into the domestication processes, particularly as they relate to five key areas: coevolution, evolvability, ecological inheritance, cooperation and the pace of evolutionary change. This discussion is next used to frame testable predictions about initial domestication of plants and animals that contrast with those grounded in standard evolutionary theory, demonstrating how these predictions might be tested in multiple regions where initial domestication took place. I then turn to a broader consideration of how domestication provides a model case study consideration of the different ways in which the core assumptions of the EES strengthen and expand our understanding of evolution, including reciprocal causation, developmental processes as drivers of evolutionary change, inclusive inheritance, and the tempo and rate of evolutionary change.

Citing Articles

The Domestication of Wild Boar Could Result in a Relaxed Selection for Maintaining Olfactory Capacity.

Buglione M, Rivieccio E, Aceto S, Paturzo V, Biondi C, Fulgione D Life (Basel). 2024; 14(8).

PMID: 39202786 PMC: 11355481. DOI: 10.3390/life14081045.


Needs for a conceptual bridge between biological domestication and early food globalization.

Liu X, Jones M Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A. 2024; 121(16):e2219055121.

PMID: 38536744 PMC: 11032431. DOI: 10.1073/pnas.2219055121.


Could care giving have altered the evolution of human immune strategies?.

Gilbert B, Kessler S Evol Med Public Health. 2024; 12(1):33-49.

PMID: 38380131 PMC: 10878251. DOI: 10.1093/emph/eoae004.


Characteristic processes of human evolution caused the Anthropocene and may obstruct its global solutions.

Waring T, Wood Z, Szathmary E Philos Trans R Soc Lond B Biol Sci. 2023; 379(1893):20220259.

PMID: 37952628 PMC: 10645123. DOI: 10.1098/rstb.2022.0259.


Phylogenetic Analysis of Russian Native Sheep Breeds Based on mtDNA Sequences.

Koshkina O, Deniskova T, Dotsev A, Kunz E, Selionova M, Medugorac I Genes (Basel). 2023; 14(9).

PMID: 37761841 PMC: 10531259. DOI: 10.3390/genes14091701.


References
1.
Hendry A, Farrugia T, Kinnison M . Human influences on rates of phenotypic change in wild animal populations. Mol Ecol. 2008; 17(1):20-9. DOI: 10.1111/j.1365-294X.2007.03428.x. View

2.
Moczek A . The nature of nurture and the future of evodevo: toward a theory of developmental evolution. Integr Comp Biol. 2012; 52(1):108-19. DOI: 10.1093/icb/ics048. View

3.
Futuyma D . Evolutionary biology today and the call for an extended synthesis. Interface Focus. 2017; 7(5):20160145. PMC: 5566807. DOI: 10.1098/rsfs.2016.0145. View

4.
Erwin D . Macroevolution of ecosystem engineering, niche construction and diversity. Trends Ecol Evol. 2008; 23(6):304-10. DOI: 10.1016/j.tree.2008.01.013. View

5.
Zeder M, Emshwiller E, Smith B, Bradley D . Documenting domestication: the intersection of genetics and archaeology. Trends Genet. 2006; 22(3):139-55. DOI: 10.1016/j.tig.2006.01.007. View