» Articles » PMID: 28838857

Value of Physical Tests in Diagnosing Cervical Radiculopathy: a Systematic Review

Overview
Journal Spine J
Specialty Orthopedics
Date 2017 Aug 26
PMID 28838857
Citations 36
Authors
Affiliations
Soon will be listed here.
Abstract

Background Context: In clinical practice, the diagnosis of cervical radiculopathy is based on information from the patient's history, physical examination, and diagnostic imaging. Various physical tests may be performed, but their diagnostic accuracy is unknown.

Purpose: This study aimed to summarize and update the evidence on diagnostic performance of tests carried out during a physical examination for the diagnosis of cervical radiculopathy.

Study Design: A review of the accuracy of diagnostic tests was carried out.

Study Sample: The study sample comprised diagnostic studies comparing results of tests performed during a physical examination in diagnosing cervical radiculopathy with a reference standard of imaging or surgical findings.

Outcome Measures: Sensitivity, specificity, likelihood ratios are presented, together with pooled results for sensitivity and specificity.

Methods: A literature search up to March 2016 was performed in CENTRAL, PubMed (MEDLINE), Embase, CINAHL, Web of Science, and Google Scholar. The methodological quality of studies was assessed using the QUADAS-2.

Results: Five diagnostic accuracy studies were identified. Only Spurling's test was evaluated in more than one study, showing high specificity ranging from 0.89 to 1.00 (95% confidence interval [CI]: 0.59-1.00); sensitivity varied from 0.38 to 0.97 (95% CI: 0.21-0.99). No studies were found that assessed the diagnostic accuracy of widely used neurological tests such as key muscle strength, tendon reflexes, and sensory impairments.

Conclusions: There is limited evidence for accuracy of physical examination tests for the diagnosis of cervical radiculopathy. When consistent with patient history, clinicians may use a combination of Spurling's, axial traction, and an Arm Squeeze test to increase the likelihood of a cervical radiculopathy, whereas a combined results of four negative neurodynamics tests and an Arm Squeeze test could be used to rule out the disorder.

Citing Articles

Diagnostic Dilemmas in Carpal Tunnel Syndrome and Cervical Spine Disorders: A Comprehensive Review.

Hara Y, Yoshii Y Diagnostics (Basel). 2025; 15(2).

PMID: 39857006 PMC: 11764257. DOI: 10.3390/diagnostics15020122.


Accuracy of the Standard and Distal-to-Proximal Sequence of the Upper Limb Neurodynamic Test 1 for the Diagnosis of Carpal Tunnel Syndrome: The Role of Side-to-Side Comparisons.

Ciuffreda G, Bueno-Gracia E, Arguello-Espinosa M, Shacklock M, Navarrete-Navarro S, Vicente-Garza I J Clin Med. 2024; 13(23).

PMID: 39685581 PMC: 11642003. DOI: 10.3390/jcm13237122.


Development and internal validation of a multivariable prognostic model to predict chronic pain after a new episode of non-specific idiopathic, non-traumatic neck pain in physiotherapy primary care practice.

Verwoerd M, Wittink H, Maissan F, Teunis M, van Kuijk S, Smeets R BMJ Open. 2024; 14(8):e086683.

PMID: 39182932 PMC: 11404218. DOI: 10.1136/bmjopen-2024-086683.


A Comparative Study of the Graston Technique and Alfredson Protocol in the Management of Achilles Tendinopathy.

Qureshi A, Hameed M, Umar M, Yasir U, Abbas Z, Jamil S Cureus. 2024; 16(6):e62249.

PMID: 39006664 PMC: 11244946. DOI: 10.7759/cureus.62249.


Impact of neck posture and insulating stick use on neck disability in Korean line workers: a cross-sectional study.

Ju B, Lee J, Kim H, Lee C, Song H Ann Occup Environ Med. 2024; 36:e11.

PMID: 38741681 PMC: 11090668. DOI: 10.35371/aoem.2024.36.e11.