Defining the Relative Performance of Isothermal Assays That Can Be Used for Rapid and Sensitive Detection of Foot-and-mouth Disease Virus
Overview
Authors
Affiliations
This study describes the first multiway comparison of portable isothermal assays for the detection of foot-and-mouth disease virus (FMDV), benchmarked against real-time reverse transcription RT-PCR (rRT-PCR). The selected isothermal chemistries included reverse transcription loop-mediated isothermal amplification (RT-LAMP) and reverse transcription recombinase polymerase amplification (RT-RPA). The analytical sensitivity of RT-LAMP was comparable to rRT-PCR (10 RNA copies), while RT-RPA was one log less sensitive (10 RNA copies). Diagnostic performance was evaluated using a panel of 35 samples from FMDV-positive cattle and eight samples from cattle infected with other vesicular viruses. Assay concordance for RT-LAMP and RT-RPA was 86-98% and 67-77%, respectively, when compared to rRT-PCR, with discordant samples consistently having high rRT-PCR cycle threshold values (no false-positives were detected for any assay). In addition, a hierarchy of sample preparation methods, from robotic extraction to simple dilution of samples, for epithelial suspensions, serum and oesophageal-pharyngeal (OP) fluid were evaluated. Results obtained for RT-LAMP confirmed that FMDV RNA can be detected in the absence of RNA extraction. However, simple sample preparation methods were less encouraging for RT-RPA, with accurate results only obtained when using RNA extraction. Although the evaluation of assay performance is specific to the conditions tested in this study, the compatibility of RT-LAMP chemistry with multiple sample types, both in the presence and absence of nucleic acid extraction, provides advantages over alternative isothermal chemistries and alternative pen-side diagnostics such as antigen-detection lateral-flow devices. These characteristics of RT-LAMP enable the assay to be performed over a large diagnostic detection window, providing a realistic means to rapidly confirm positive FMD cases close to the point of sampling.
Tan W, Ward M Aust Vet J. 2024; 102(12):616-625.
PMID: 39375190 PMC: 11608923. DOI: 10.1111/avj.13376.
Fry J, Lee J, McAuley J, Porter J, Monk I, Martin S ACS Omega. 2024; 9(39):40832-40840.
PMID: 39372017 PMC: 11447726. DOI: 10.1021/acsomega.4c05784.
Edwards N, Reboud J, Yan X, Guo X, Cooper J, Wadsworth J Front Microbiol. 2024; 15:1429288.
PMID: 39188314 PMC: 11346313. DOI: 10.3389/fmicb.2024.1429288.
Amano M, Sapkanarak K, Thbthimthong W, Meesawat S, Kemthong T, Suttisan N Viruses. 2023; 15(10).
PMID: 37896863 PMC: 10611326. DOI: 10.3390/v15102086.
Rapid Detection of DNA and RNA Shrimp Viruses Using CRISPR-Based Diagnostics.
Major S, Harke M, Cruz-Flores R, Dhar A, Bodnar A, Wanamaker S Appl Environ Microbiol. 2023; 89(6):e0215122.
PMID: 37219435 PMC: 10304985. DOI: 10.1128/aem.02151-22.