» Articles » PMID: 28836119

Cross-Cultural Study of Information Processing Biases in Chronic Fatigue Syndrome: Comparison of Dutch and UK Chronic Fatigue Patients

Overview
Journal Int J Behav Med
Publisher Informa Healthcare
Date 2017 Aug 25
PMID 28836119
Citations 3
Authors
Affiliations
Soon will be listed here.
Abstract

Purpose: This study aims to replicate a UK study, with a Dutch sample to explore whether attention and interpretation biases and general attentional control deficits in chronic fatigue syndrome (CFS) are similar across populations and cultures.

Method: Thirty eight Dutch CFS participants were compared to 52 CFS and 51 healthy participants recruited from the UK. Participants completed self-report measures of symptoms, functioning, and mood, as well as three experimental tasks (i) visual-probe task measuring attentional bias to illness (somatic symptoms and disability) versus neutral words, (ii) interpretive bias task measuring positive versus somatic interpretations of ambiguous information, and (iii) the Attention Network Test measuring general attentional control.

Results: Compared to controls, Dutch and UK participants with CFS showed a significant attentional bias for illness-related words and were significantly more likely to interpret ambiguous information in a somatic way. These effects were not moderated by attentional control. There were no significant differences between the Dutch and UK CFS groups on attentional bias, interpretation bias, or attentional control scores.

Conclusion: This study replicated the main findings of the UK study, with a Dutch CFS population, indicating that across these two cultures, people with CFS demonstrate biases in how somatic information is attended to and interpreted. These illness-specific biases appear to be unrelated to general attentional control deficits.

Citing Articles

Is There Reduced Hemodynamic Brain Activation in Multiple Sclerosis Even with Undisturbed Cognition?.

Wagner B, Harig C, Walter B, Sommer J, Sammer G, Berghoff M Int J Mol Sci. 2023; 24(1).

PMID: 36613551 PMC: 9820283. DOI: 10.3390/ijms24010112.


Non-Pharmacological Integrated Interventions for Adults Targeting Type 2 Diabetes and Mental Health Comorbidity: A Mixed-Methods Systematic Review.

Tuudah E, Foye U, Donetto S, Simpson A Int J Integr Care. 2022; 22(2):27.

PMID: 35855093 PMC: 9248983. DOI: 10.5334/ijic.5960.


Myalgic encephalomyelitis or chronic fatigue syndrome: how could the illness develop?.

Morris G, Maes M, Berk M, Puri B Metab Brain Dis. 2019; 34(2):385-415.

PMID: 30758706 PMC: 6428797. DOI: 10.1007/s11011-019-0388-6.

References
1.
Stahl D, Rimes K, Chalder T . Mechanisms of change underlying the efficacy of cognitive behaviour therapy for chronic fatigue syndrome in a specialist clinic: a mediation analysis. Psychol Med. 2013; 44(6):1331-44. DOI: 10.1017/S0033291713002006. View

2.
MacLeod C, Mathews A, Tata P . Attentional bias in emotional disorders. J Abnorm Psychol. 1986; 95(1):15-20. DOI: 10.1037//0021-843x.95.1.15. View

3.
Cella M, Chalder T . Measuring fatigue in clinical and community settings. J Psychosom Res. 2010; 69(1):17-22. DOI: 10.1016/j.jpsychores.2009.10.007. View

4.
Fukuda K, Straus S, Hickie I, Sharpe M, Dobbins J, Komaroff A . The chronic fatigue syndrome: a comprehensive approach to its definition and study. International Chronic Fatigue Syndrome Study Group. Ann Intern Med. 1994; 121(12):953-9. DOI: 10.7326/0003-4819-121-12-199412150-00009. View

5.
Collin S, Nuevo R, van de Putte E, Nijhof S, Crawley E . Chronic fatigue syndrome (CFS) or myalgic encephalomyelitis (ME) is different in children compared to in adults: a study of UK and Dutch clinical cohorts. BMJ Open. 2015; 5(10):e008830. PMC: 4636651. DOI: 10.1136/bmjopen-2015-008830. View