» Articles » PMID: 28836083

Microwave Breast Cancer Detection Using Time-frequency Representations

Overview
Publisher Springer
Date 2017 Aug 25
PMID 28836083
Citations 3
Authors
Affiliations
Soon will be listed here.
Abstract

Microwave-based breast cancer detection has been proposed as a complementary approach to compensate for some drawbacks of existing breast cancer detection techniques. Among the existing microwave breast cancer detection methods, machine learning-type algorithms have recently become more popular. These focus on detecting the existence of breast tumours rather than performing imaging to identify the exact tumour position. A key component of the machine learning approaches is feature extraction. One of the most widely used feature extraction method is principle component analysis (PCA). However, it can be sensitive to signal misalignment. This paper proposes feature extraction methods based on time-frequency representations of microwave data, including the wavelet transform and the empirical mode decomposition. Time-invariant statistics can be generated to provide features more robust to data misalignment. We validate results using clinical data sets combined with numerically simulated tumour responses. Experimental results show that features extracted from decomposition results of the wavelet transform and EMD improve the detection performance when combined with an ensemble selection-based classifier.

Citing Articles

Biomedical Applications of Electromagnetic Detection: A Brief Review.

Huang P, Xu L, Xie Y Biosensors (Basel). 2021; 11(7).

PMID: 34356696 PMC: 8301974. DOI: 10.3390/bios11070225.


Multi-stage feature selection (MSFS) algorithm for UWB-based early breast cancer size prediction.

Vijayasarveswari V, Andrew A, Jusoh M, Sabapathy T, Raof R, Yasin M PLoS One. 2020; 15(8):e0229367.

PMID: 32790672 PMC: 7425918. DOI: 10.1371/journal.pone.0229367.


Diagnosing Breast Cancer with Microwave Technology: remaining challenges and potential solutions with machine learning.

Oliveira B, Godinho D, OHalloran M, Glavin M, Jones E, Conceicao R Diagnostics (Basel). 2018; 8(2).

PMID: 29783760 PMC: 6023429. DOI: 10.3390/diagnostics8020036.

References
1.
Shea J, Kosmas P, Hagness S, Van Veen B . Three-dimensional microwave imaging of realistic numerical breast phantoms via a multiple-frequency inverse scattering technique. Med Phys. 2010; 37(8):4210-26. PMC: 2921423. DOI: 10.1118/1.3443569. View

2.
Li S, Zhou W, Yuan Q, Geng S, Cai D . Feature extraction and recognition of ictal EEG using EMD and SVM. Comput Biol Med. 2013; 43(7):807-16. DOI: 10.1016/j.compbiomed.2013.04.002. View

3.
Meaney P, Fanning M, Raynolds T, Fox C, Fang Q, Kogel C . Initial clinical experience with microwave breast imaging in women with normal mammography. Acad Radiol. 2007; 14(2):207-18. PMC: 1832118. DOI: 10.1016/j.acra.2006.10.016. View

4.
Davis S, Tandradinata H, Hagness S, Van Veen B . Ultrawideband microwave breast cancer detection: a detection-theoretic approach using the generalized likelihood ratio test. IEEE Trans Biomed Eng. 2005; 52(7):1237-50. DOI: 10.1109/TBME.2005.847528. View

5.
Lim H, Nhung N, Li E, Thang N . Confocal microwave imaging for breast cancer detection: delay-multiply-and-sum image reconstruction algorithm. IEEE Trans Biomed Eng. 2008; 55(6):1697-704. DOI: 10.1109/tbme.2008.919716. View