» Articles » PMID: 28835992

Controversies on Lung Cancers Manifesting As Part-solid Nodules

Overview
Journal Eur Radiol
Specialty Radiology
Date 2017 Aug 25
PMID 28835992
Citations 26
Authors
Affiliations
Soon will be listed here.
Abstract

Purpose: Summarise survival of patients with resected lung cancers manifesting as part-solid nodules (PSNs).

Methods: PubMed/MEDLINE and EMBASE databases were searched for all studies/clinical trials on CT-detected lung cancer in English before 21 December 2015 to identify surgically resected lung cancers manifesting as PSNs. Outcome measures were lung cancer-specific survival (LCS), overall survival (OS), or disease-free survival (DFS). All PSNs were classified by the percentage of solid component to the entire nodule diameter into category PSNs <80% or category PSNs ≥80%.

Results: Twenty studies reported on PSNs <80%: 7 reported DFS and 2 OS of 100%, 6 DFS 96.3-98.7%, and 11 OS 94.7-98.9% (median DFS 100% and OS 97.5%). Twenty-seven studies reported on PSNs ≥80%: 1 DFS and 2 OS of 100%, 19 DFS 48.0%-98.0% (median 82.6%), and 16 reported OS 43.0%-98.0% (median DFS 82.6%, OS 85.5%). Both DFS and OS were always higher for PSNs <80%.

Conclusion: A clear definition of the upper limit of solid component of a PSN is needed to avoid misclassification because cell-types and outcomes are different for PSN and solid nodules. The workup should be based on the size of the solid component.

Key Points: • Lung cancers manifesting as PSNs are slow growing with high cure rates. • Upper limits of the solid component are important for correct interpretation. • Consensus definition is important for the management of PSNs. • Median disease-free-survival (DFS) increased with decreasing size of the nodule.

Citing Articles

Risk factors for malignant solid pulmonary nodules: a meta-analysis.

Yang Y, Li X, Duan Y, Zhao J, Huang Q, Zhou C BMC Cancer. 2025; 25(1):312.

PMID: 39984890 PMC: 11844030. DOI: 10.1186/s12885-025-13702-2.


Advances in molecular imaging and targeted therapeutics for lymph node metastasis in cancer: a comprehensive review.

Wu Y, Shang J, Zhang X, Li N J Nanobiotechnology. 2024; 22(1):783.

PMID: 39702277 PMC: 11657939. DOI: 10.1186/s12951-024-02940-4.


Precise diagnosis and prognosis assessment of malignant lung nodules: a narrative review.

Wen M, Zheng Q, Ji X, Xin S, Zhou Y, Tian Y J Thorac Dis. 2024; 16(11):7999-8013.

PMID: 39678870 PMC: 11635230. DOI: 10.21037/jtd-24-1058.


Latest Clinical Evidence and Operative Strategy for Small-Sized Lung Cancers.

Hattori A, Suzuki K Juntendo Iji Zasshi. 2024; 68(1):52-59.

PMID: 38911012 PMC: 11189789. DOI: 10.14789/jmj.JMJ21-0030-OT.


Prognostic significance of ground-glass areas within tumours in non-small-cell lung cancer.

Sakurai H, Goto Y, Yoh K, Takamochi K, Shukuya T, Hishida T Eur J Cardiothorac Surg. 2024; 65(4).

PMID: 38598462 PMC: 11091536. DOI: 10.1093/ejcts/ezae158.


References
1.
Yip R, Wolf A, Tam K, Taioli E, Olkin I, Flores R . Outcomes of lung cancers manifesting as nonsolid nodules. Lung Cancer. 2016; 97:35-42. DOI: 10.1016/j.lungcan.2016.04.005. View

2.
Aoki T, Tomoda Y, Watanabe H, Nakata H, Kasai T, Hashimoto H . Peripheral lung adenocarcinoma: correlation of thin-section CT findings with histologic prognostic factors and survival. Radiology. 2001; 220(3):803-9. DOI: 10.1148/radiol.2203001701. View

3.
Kim E, Johkoh T, Lee K, Han J, Fujimoto K, Sadohara J . Quantification of ground-glass opacity on high-resolution CT of small peripheral adenocarcinoma of the lung: pathologic and prognostic implications. AJR Am J Roentgenol. 2001; 177(6):1417-22. DOI: 10.2214/ajr.177.6.1771417. View

4.
Duann C, Hung J, Hsu P, Huang C, Hsieh C, Hsu H . Surgical outcomes in lung cancer presenting as ground-glass opacities of 3 cm or less: a review of 5 years' experience. J Chin Med Assoc. 2013; 76(12):693-7. DOI: 10.1016/j.jcma.2013.08.005. View

5.
Kuriyama K, Seto M, Kasugai T, Higashiyama M, Kido S, Sawai Y . Ground-glass opacity on thin-section CT: value in differentiating subtypes of adenocarcinoma of the lung. AJR Am J Roentgenol. 1999; 173(2):465-9. DOI: 10.2214/ajr.173.2.10430155. View