» Articles » PMID: 28830753

Bladder Reconstruction Rates Differ Among Centers Participating in National Spina Bifida Patient Registry

Overview
Journal J Urol
Publisher Wolters Kluwer
Specialty Urology
Date 2017 Aug 24
PMID 28830753
Citations 6
Authors
Affiliations
Soon will be listed here.
Abstract

Purpose: We performed an exploratory analysis of data from the NSBPR (National Spina Bifida Patient Registry) to assess variation in the frequency of bladder reconstruction surgeries among NSBPR centers.

Materials And Methods: We queried the 2009-2014 NSBPR to identify patients who had ever undergone bladder reconstruction surgeries. We evaluated demographic characteristics, spina bifida type, functional level, mobility and NSBPR center to determine whether any of these factors were associated with reconstructive surgery rates. Multivariable logistic regression was used to simultaneously adjust for the impact of these factors.

Results: We identified 5,528 patients with spina bifida enrolled in the NSBPR. Of these patients 1,129 (20.4%) underwent bladder reconstruction (703 augmentation, 382 continent catheterizable channel, 189 bladder outlet procedure). Surgical patients were more likely older, female, nonHispanic white, with a higher lesion level, myelomeningocele diagnosis, nonambulators (all p <0.001) and nonprivately insured (p=0.018). Bladder reconstruction surgery rates varied among NSBPR centers (range 12.1% to 37.9%, p <0.001). After correcting for known confounders NSBPR center, spina bifida type, mobility, gender and age (all p <0.001) were significant predictors of surgical intervention. Race (p=0.19) and insurance status (p=0.11) were not associated with surgical intervention.

Conclusions: There is significant variation in rates of bladder reconstruction surgery among NSBPR centers. In addition to clinical factors such as mobility status, lesion type and lesion level, nonclinical factors such as patient age, gender and treating center are also associated with the likelihood of an individual undergoing bladder reconstruction.

Citing Articles

Improvement of bladder function after bladder augmentation surgery: a report of 26 years of clinical experience.

Trojan K, Schneider J, Banuelos Marco B, Ciesla L, Geppert T, Kaindl A Pediatr Surg Int. 2022; 38(6):941-948.

PMID: 35348841 PMC: 9054860. DOI: 10.1007/s00383-022-05114-1.


The Importance of Early Diagnosis and Management of Pediatric Neurogenic Bladder Dysfunction.

Hobbs K, Krischak M, Tejwani R, Purves J, Wiener J, Routh J Res Rep Urol. 2021; 13:647-657.

PMID: 34513742 PMC: 8421253. DOI: 10.2147/RRU.S259307.


Trends in Procedures to Initiate Renal Replacement Therapy among People Living with Spina Bifida.

Streur C, Moloci N, Kraft K, Sarma A, Shahinian V, Hollingsworth J J Urol. 2020; 205(1):250-256.

PMID: 32716680 PMC: 7725887. DOI: 10.1097/JU.0000000000001314.


Kidney Function Surveillance in the National Spina Bifida Patient Registry: A Retrospective Cohort Study.

Chu D, Liu T, Patel P, Routh J, Ouyang L, Baum M J Urol. 2020; 204(3):578-586.

PMID: 32141805 PMC: 7415638. DOI: 10.1097/JU.0000000000001010.


Urodynamic and imaging findings in infants with myelomeningocele may predict need for future augmentation cystoplasty.

Corona L, Lee T, Marchetti K, Streur C, Ivancic V, Kraft K J Pediatr Urol. 2019; 15(6):644.e1-644.e5.

PMID: 31653462 PMC: 7086486. DOI: 10.1016/j.jpurol.2019.09.015.


References
1.
Szymanski K, Misseri R, Whittam B, Yang D, Raposo S, King S . Quality of Life Assessment in Spina Bifida for Children (QUALAS-C): Development and Validation of a Novel Health-related Quality of Life Instrument. Urology. 2015; 87:178-84. DOI: 10.1016/j.urology.2015.09.027. View

2.
Szymanski K, Misseri R, Whittam B, Kaefer M, Rink R, Cain M . Quantity, Not Frequency, Predicts Bother with Urinary Incontinence and its Impact on Quality of Life in Adults with Spina Bifida. J Urol. 2016; 195(4 Pt 2):1263-9. DOI: 10.1016/j.juro.2015.07.108. View

3.
Schechter M, Liu T, Soe M, Swanson M, Ward E, Thibadeau J . Sociodemographic attributes and spina bifida outcomes. Pediatrics. 2015; 135(4):e957-64. PMC: 4536568. DOI: 10.1542/peds.2014-2576. View

4.
Maclure M, Hankinson S . Analysis of selection bias in a case-control study of renal adenocarcinoma. Epidemiology. 1990; 1(6):441-7. DOI: 10.1097/00001648-199011000-00005. View

5.
Snow-Lisy D, Yerkes E, Cheng E . Update on Urological Management of Spina Bifida from Prenatal Diagnosis to Adulthood. J Urol. 2015; 194(2):288-96. DOI: 10.1016/j.juro.2015.03.107. View