» Articles » PMID: 28824512

A Cognitive Modeling Approach to Strategy Formation in Dynamic Decision Making

Overview
Journal Front Psychol
Date 2017 Aug 22
PMID 28824512
Citations 8
Authors
Affiliations
Soon will be listed here.
Abstract

Decision-making is a high-level cognitive process based on cognitive processes like perception, attention, and memory. Real-life situations require series of decisions to be made, with each decision depending on previous feedback from a potentially changing environment. To gain a better understanding of the underlying processes of dynamic decision-making, we applied the method of cognitive modeling on a complex rule-based category learning task. Here, participants first needed to identify the conjunction of two rules that defined a target category and later adapt to a reversal of feedback contingencies. We developed an ACT-R model for the core aspects of this dynamic decision-making task. An important aim of our model was that it provides a general account of how such tasks are solved and, with minor changes, is applicable to other stimulus materials. The model was implemented as a mixture of an exemplar-based and a rule-based approach which incorporates perceptual-motor and metacognitive aspects as well. The model solves the categorization task by first trying out one-feature strategies and then, as a result of repeated negative feedback, switching to two-feature strategies. Overall, this model solves the task in a similar way as participants do, including generally successful initial learning as well as reversal learning after the change of feedback contingencies. Moreover, the fact that not all participants were successful in the two learning phases is also reflected in the modeling data. However, we found a larger variance and a lower overall performance of the modeling data as compared to the human data which may relate to perceptual preferences or additional knowledge and rules applied by the participants. In a next step, these aspects could be implemented in the model for a better overall fit. In view of the large interindividual differences in decision performance between participants, additional information about the underlying cognitive processes from behavioral, psychobiological and neurophysiological data may help to optimize future applications of this model such that it can be transferred to other domains of comparable dynamic decision tasks.

Citing Articles

Systematic research is needed on the potential effects of lifelong technology experience on cognition: a mini-review and recommendations.

Beaudoin M, Jones K, Jerome B, Martinez D, George T, Pandza N Front Psychol. 2024; 15:1335864.

PMID: 38434954 PMC: 10904591. DOI: 10.3389/fpsyg.2024.1335864.


Study on the influence mechanism of perceived benefits on unsafe behavioral decision-making based on ERPs and EROs.

Zhang S, Yang Q, Wei C, Shi X, Zhang Y Front Neurosci. 2023; 17:1231592.

PMID: 38156269 PMC: 10752936. DOI: 10.3389/fnins.2023.1231592.


Action-rule-based cognitive control enables efficient execution of stimulus-response conflict tasks: a model validation of Simon task performance.

Otani Y, Katagiri Y, Imai E, Kowa H Front Hum Neurosci. 2023; 17:1239207.

PMID: 38034070 PMC: 10687480. DOI: 10.3389/fnhum.2023.1239207.


Cognitive modeling for understanding interactions between people and decision support tools in complex and uncertain environments: A study protocol.

Molina I, Molina-Perez E, Sobrino F, Tellez-Rojas M, Serra-Barragan L, Castellon-Flores A PLoS One. 2023; 18(10):e0290683.

PMID: 37797048 PMC: 10553798. DOI: 10.1371/journal.pone.0290683.


The Effects of Tinnitus in Probabilistic Learning Tasks: Protocol for an Ecological Momentary Assessment Study.

Zhang L, Monacelli G, Vashisht H, Schlee W, Langguth B, Ward T JMIR Res Protoc. 2022; 11(11):e36583.

PMID: 36367761 PMC: 9700237. DOI: 10.2196/36583.


References
1.
Kruschke J . ALCOVE: an exemplar-based connectionist model of category learning. Psychol Rev. 1992; 99(1):22-44. DOI: 10.1037/0033-295x.99.1.22. View

2.
Salvucci D . Modeling driver behavior in a cognitive architecture. Hum Factors. 2006; 48(2):362-80. DOI: 10.1518/001872006777724417. View

3.
Lebiere C, Pirolli P, Thomson R, Paik J, Rutledge-Taylor M, Staszewski J . A functional model of sensemaking in a neurocognitive architecture. Comput Intell Neurosci. 2013; 2013:921695. PMC: 3835765. DOI: 10.1155/2013/921695. View

4.
Marewski J, Link D . Strategy selection: An introduction to the modeling challenge. Wiley Interdiscip Rev Cogn Sci. 2015; 5(1):39-59. DOI: 10.1002/wcs.1265. View

5.
Knauff M, Wolf A . Complex cognition: the science of human reasoning, problem-solving, and decision-making. Cogn Process. 2010; 11(2):99-102. DOI: 10.1007/s10339-010-0362-z. View