» Articles » PMID: 28823828

What is Changing When: Decoding Visual Information in Movies from Human Intracranial Recordings

Overview
Journal Neuroimage
Specialty Radiology
Date 2017 Aug 22
PMID 28823828
Citations 6
Authors
Affiliations
Soon will be listed here.
Abstract

The majority of visual recognition studies have focused on the neural responses to repeated presentations of static stimuli with abrupt and well-defined onset and offset times. In contrast, natural vision involves unique renderings of visual inputs that are continuously changing without explicitly defined temporal transitions. Here we considered commercial movies as a coarse proxy to natural vision. We recorded intracranial field potential signals from 1,284 electrodes implanted in 15 patients with epilepsy while the subjects passively viewed commercial movies. We could rapidly detect large changes in the visual inputs within approximately 100 ms of their occurrence, using exclusively field potential signals from ventral visual cortical areas including the inferior temporal gyrus and inferior occipital gyrus. Furthermore, we could decode the content of those visual changes even in a single movie presentation, generalizing across the wide range of transformations present in a movie. These results present a methodological framework for studying cognition during dynamic and natural vision.

Citing Articles

Semantic novelty modulates neural responses to visual change across the human brain.

Nentwich M, Leszczynski M, Russ B, Hirsch L, Markowitz N, Sapru K Nat Commun. 2023; 14(1):2910.

PMID: 37217478 PMC: 10203305. DOI: 10.1038/s41467-023-38576-5.


Modulation of Spectral Representation and Connectivity Patterns in Response to Visual Narrative in the Human Brain.

Sabra Z, Alawieh A, Bonilha L, Naselaris T, AuYong N Front Hum Neurosci. 2022; 16:886938.

PMID: 36277048 PMC: 9582122. DOI: 10.3389/fnhum.2022.886938.


Neurons detect cognitive boundaries to structure episodic memories in humans.

Zheng J, Schjetnan A, Yebra M, Gomes B, Mosher C, Kalia S Nat Neurosci. 2022; 25(3):358-368.

PMID: 35260859 PMC: 8966433. DOI: 10.1038/s41593-022-01020-w.


Growing evidence for separate neural mechanisms for attention and consciousness.

Maier A, Tsuchiya N Atten Percept Psychophys. 2020; 83(2):558-576.

PMID: 33034851 PMC: 7886945. DOI: 10.3758/s13414-020-02146-4.


Human stereoEEG recordings reveal network dynamics of decision-making in a rule-switching task.

Ter Wal M, Platonov A, Cardellicchio P, Pelliccia V, LoRusso G, Sartori I Nat Commun. 2020; 11(1):3075.

PMID: 32555174 PMC: 7300004. DOI: 10.1038/s41467-020-16854-w.


References
1.
Destrieux C, Fischl B, Dale A, Halgren E . Automatic parcellation of human cortical gyri and sulci using standard anatomical nomenclature. Neuroimage. 2010; 53(1):1-15. PMC: 2937159. DOI: 10.1016/j.neuroimage.2010.06.010. View

2.
Rust N, Movshon J . In praise of artifice. Nat Neurosci. 2005; 8(12):1647-50. DOI: 10.1038/nn1606. View

3.
Grill-Spector K, Malach R . The human visual cortex. Annu Rev Neurosci. 2004; 27:649-77. DOI: 10.1146/annurev.neuro.27.070203.144220. View

4.
Conroy B, Singer B, Guntupalli J, Ramadge P, Haxby J . Inter-subject alignment of human cortical anatomy using functional connectivity. Neuroimage. 2013; 81:400-411. PMC: 3729877. DOI: 10.1016/j.neuroimage.2013.05.009. View

5.
Hung C, Kreiman G, Poggio T, DiCarlo J . Fast readout of object identity from macaque inferior temporal cortex. Science. 2005; 310(5749):863-6. DOI: 10.1126/science.1117593. View