» Articles » PMID: 28823611

Pharmacological Profile of Methylphenidate-based Designer Drugs

Overview
Specialties Neurology
Pharmacology
Date 2017 Aug 22
PMID 28823611
Citations 22
Authors
Affiliations
Soon will be listed here.
Abstract

Background: Methylphenidate-based designer drugs are new psychoactive substances (NPS) that are used outside medical settings and their pharmacology is largely unexplored. The aim of the present study was to characterize the pharmacology of methylphenidate-based substances in vitro.

Methods: We determined the potencies of the methylphenidate-based NPS N-benzylethylphenidate, 3,4-dichloroethylphenidate, 3,4-dichloromethylphenidate, ethylnaphthidate, ethylphenidate, 4-fluoromethylphenidate, isopropylphenidate, 4-methylmethylphenidate, methylmorphenate, and propylphenidate and the potencies of the related compounds cocaine and modafinil with respect to norepinephrine, dopamine, and serotonin transporter inhibition in transporter-transfected human embryonic kidney 293 cells. We also investigated monoamine efflux and monoamine receptor and transporter binding affinities. Furthermore, we assessed the cell integrity under assay conditions.

Results: All methylphenidate-based substances inhibited the norepinephrine and dopamine transporters 4 to >1000-fold more potently than the serotonin transporter. Similar to methylphenidate and cocaine, methylphenidate-based NPS did not elicit transporter-mediated efflux of monoamines. Besides binding to monoamine transporters, several test drugs had affinity for adrenergic, serotonergic, and rat trace amine-associated receptors but not for dopaminergic or mouse trace amine-associated receptors. No cytotoxicity was observed after drug treatment at assay concentrations.

Conclusion: Methylphenidate-based substances had pharmacological profiles similar to methylphenidate and cocaine. The predominant actions on dopamine transporters vs. serotonin transporters may be relevant when considering abuse liability. This article is part of the Special Issue entitled 'Designer Drugs and Legal Highs.'

Citing Articles

Analytical characterization and differentiation between threo- and erythro-4-fluoroethylphenidate.

Sakamoto M, Suzuki T, Teraoka D, Tanaka K, Saeki Y, Kishimoto K Forensic Toxicol. 2023; 41(2):272-286.

PMID: 37097346 DOI: 10.1007/s11419-023-00664-y.


Methylphenidate Analogues as a New Class of Potential Disease-Modifying Agents for Parkinson's Disease: Evidence from Cell Models and Alpha-Synuclein Transgenic Mice.

Casiraghi A, Longhena F, Faustini G, Ribaudo G, Suigo L, Camacho-Hernandez G Pharmaceutics. 2022; 14(8).

PMID: 36015221 PMC: 9414221. DOI: 10.3390/pharmaceutics14081595.


Establishment of Neurotoxicity Assessment Using Microelectrode Array (MEA) with hiPSC-Derived Neurons and Evaluation of New Psychoactive Substances (NPS).

Kang K, Kim C, Kim J, Ryu B, Lee S, Baek J Int J Stem Cells. 2022; 15(3):258-269.

PMID: 35769054 PMC: 9396014. DOI: 10.15283/ijsc21217.


Hepato-Protection Effect of Curcumin Against Methylphenidate-Induced Hepatotoxicity: Histological and Biochemical Evidences.

Ahmadinasab H, Motaghinejad M, Nosratabad B, Bozorgniahosseini S, Rostami P, Jafarabadi G Int J Prev Med. 2022; 13:65.

PMID: 35706867 PMC: 9188892. DOI: 10.4103/ijpvm.IJPVM_435_20.


Pharmacological affinity fingerprints derived from bioactivity data for the identification of designer drugs.

He K J Cheminform. 2022; 14(1):35.

PMID: 35672835 PMC: 9171973. DOI: 10.1186/s13321-022-00607-6.