» Articles » PMID: 28823516

Examining Sex Differences in Glycemic Index Knowledge and Intake Among Individuals with Type 2 Diabetes

Overview
Publisher Elsevier
Date 2017 Aug 22
PMID 28823516
Citations 5
Authors
Affiliations
Soon will be listed here.
Abstract

Aim: We examined self-reported dietary behaviours and actual food intakes among adult men and women with type 2 diabetes participating in Alberta's Caring for Diabetes (ABCD) Study.

Methods: Participants completed 3-day food records and questions about glycemic index (GI) concept knowledge and dietary behaviours. Daily average GI and glycemic load (GL) were calculated for all carbohydrates consumed. Dietary intake was analyzed using ESHA FoodPro (version 10.13.1). Sex differences in nutrient intakes were explored across categories of GI knowledge and dietary practices.

Results: Participants (N=170) mean (SD) age 65.8 (9.6) years were 46.5% women, 90.6% Caucasian with a mean BMI of 31.3 (7.0)kg/m and diabetes duration of 13.4 (8.6) years. Overall, 60% of men versus 40% of women consumed carbohydrates in quantities below Acceptable Macronutrient Distribution Ranges (AMDR). About 80% of men versus 90% of women consumed proteins above AMDR whereas 60% versus 65% of women consumed fats above AMDR. Fibre intake among men was lower than recommended (p<0.01). Men who reported having knowledge of the GI-concept also reported lower GI intake versus men who did not (p=0.03).

Conclusion: Sex differences exist in low-GI diabetes self-care dietary behaviours among adults with type 2 diabetes participating in this study. Gender-sensitive approaches for enhancing diabetes self-care low-GI dietary behaviour should be explored.

Citing Articles

Child self-care autonomy in health (scale for parents): development, internal structure, and sex/age correlates.

Mikhaylova O, Bochkor A, Osipova P, Popov D, Chepeleva M, Rybakova E Front Psychol. 2023; 14:1243400.

PMID: 37691816 PMC: 10491485. DOI: 10.3389/fpsyg.2023.1243400.


Self-care and type 2 diabetes mellitus (T2DM): a literature review in sex-related differences.

Baroni I, Caruso R, Dellafiore F, Ausili D, Barello S, Vangone I Acta Biomed. 2022; 93(4):e2022277.

PMID: 36043961 PMC: 9534249. DOI: 10.23750/abm.v93i4.13324.


Cultural Adaptation, Validation, and Primary Application of a Questionnaire to Assess Intentions to Eat Low-Glycemic Index Foods among Rural Chinese Women.

Li M, Li F, Lin Q, Shi J, Luo J, Long Q Int J Environ Res Public Health. 2020; 17(20).

PMID: 33081057 PMC: 7590207. DOI: 10.3390/ijerph17207577.


Evaluation of Glycemic Index Education in People Living with Type 2 Diabetes: Participant Satisfaction, Knowledge Uptake, and Application.

Grant S, Glenn A, Wolever T, Josse R, OConnor D, Thompson A Nutrients. 2020; 12(8).

PMID: 32806563 PMC: 7469042. DOI: 10.3390/nu12082416.


Healthy Eating and Active Living for Diabetes-Glycemic Index (HEALD-GI): Protocol for a Pragmatic Randomized Controlled Trial.

Avedzi H, Storey K, Johnson J, Johnson S JMIR Res Protoc. 2019; 8(3):e11707.

PMID: 30839283 PMC: 6442316. DOI: 10.2196/11707.