» Articles » PMID: 28813013

Recent Advances in Electrospun Nanofiber Interfaces for Biosensing Devices

Overview
Journal Sensors (Basel)
Publisher MDPI
Specialty Biotechnology
Date 2017 Aug 17
PMID 28813013
Citations 29
Authors
Affiliations
Soon will be listed here.
Abstract

Electrospinning has emerged as a very powerful method combining efficiency, versatility and low cost to elaborate scalable ordered and complex nanofibrous assemblies from a rich variety of polymers. Electrospun nanofibers have demonstrated high potential for a wide spectrum of applications, including drug delivery, tissue engineering, energy conversion and storage, or physical and chemical sensors. The number of works related to biosensing devices integrating electrospun nanofibers has also increased substantially over the last decade. This review provides an overview of the current research activities and new trends in the field. Retaining the bioreceptor functionality is one of the main challenges associated with the production of nanofiber-based biosensing interfaces. The bioreceptors can be immobilized using various strategies, depending on the physical and chemical characteristics of both bioreceptors and nanofiber scaffolds, and on their interfacial interactions. The production of nanobiocomposites constituted by carbon, metal oxide or polymer electrospun nanofibers integrating bioreceptors and conductive nanomaterials (e.g., carbon nanotubes, metal nanoparticles) has been one of the major trends in the last few years. The use of electrospun nanofibers in ELISA-type bioassays, lab-on-a-chip and paper-based point-of-care devices is also highly promising. After a short and general description of electrospinning process, the different strategies to produce electrospun nanofiber biosensing interfaces are discussed.

Citing Articles

Electrospun cobalt-doped 2D-MoSe/polypyrrole hybrid-based carbon nanofibers as electrochemical sensing platforms.

Celik Cogal G, Cogal S, Machata P, Oksuz A, Omastova M Mikrochim Acta. 2024; 191(1):75.

PMID: 38172450 PMC: 10764547. DOI: 10.1007/s00604-023-06078-2.


A Review on Electrospun Nanofiber Composites for an Efficient Electrochemical Sensor Applications.

Vanaraj R, Arumugam B, Mayakrishnan G, Kim I, Kim S Sensors (Basel). 2023; 23(15).

PMID: 37571489 PMC: 10422532. DOI: 10.3390/s23156705.


A review on the effect of nanocomposite scaffolds reinforced with magnetic nanoparticles in osteogenesis and healing of bone injuries.

Sadeghzadeh H, Dianat-Moghadam H, Del Bakhshayesh A, Mohammadnejad D, Mehdipour A Stem Cell Res Ther. 2023; 14(1):194.

PMID: 37542279 PMC: 10403948. DOI: 10.1186/s13287-023-03426-0.


Advancements in Nanofiber-Based Electrochemical Biosensors for Diagnostic Applications.

Iftikhar F, Shah A, Wali Q, Kokab T Biosensors (Basel). 2023; 13(4).

PMID: 37185491 PMC: 10136113. DOI: 10.3390/bios13040416.


Electrospun Magnetic Nanofiber Mats for Magnetic Hyperthermia in Cancer Treatment Applications-Technology, Mechanism, and Materials.

Mamun A, Sabantina L Polymers (Basel). 2023; 15(8).

PMID: 37112049 PMC: 10143376. DOI: 10.3390/polym15081902.


References
1.
Ali M, Mondal K, Singh C, Malhotra B, Sharma A . Anti-epidermal growth factor receptor conjugated mesoporous zinc oxide nanofibers for breast cancer diagnostics. Nanoscale. 2015; 7(16):7234-45. DOI: 10.1039/c5nr00194c. View

2.
Gubala V, Harris L, Ricco A, Tan M, Williams D . Point of care diagnostics: status and future. Anal Chem. 2012; 84(2):487-515. DOI: 10.1021/ac2030199. View

3.
Zhu H, Du M, Zhang M, Wang P, Bao S, Wang L . Facile fabrication of AgNPs/(PVA/PEI) nanofibers: high electrochemical efficiency and durability for biosensors. Biosens Bioelectron. 2013; 49:210-5. DOI: 10.1016/j.bios.2013.04.016. View

4.
Burger R, Amato L, Boisen A . Detection methods for centrifugal microfluidic platforms. Biosens Bioelectron. 2015; 76:54-67. DOI: 10.1016/j.bios.2015.06.075. View

5.
Devadoss A, Han H, Song T, Kim Y, Paik U . Gold nanoparticle-composite nanofibers for enzymatic electrochemical sensing of hydrogen peroxide. Analyst. 2013; 138(17):5025-30. DOI: 10.1039/c3an00317e. View