» Articles » PMID: 28808626

Acetabular Revisions Using Porous Tantalum Components: A Retrospective Study with 5-10 Years Follow-up

Overview
Journal World J Orthop
Specialty Orthopedics
Date 2017 Aug 16
PMID 28808626
Citations 2
Authors
Affiliations
Soon will be listed here.
Abstract

Aim: To evaluate the clinical and X-ray results of acetabular components and tantalum augments in prosthetic hip revisions.

Methods: Fifty-eight hip prostheses with primary failure of the acetabular component were reviewed with tantalum implants. The clinical records and X-rays of these cases were retrospectively reviewed. Bone defect evaluations were based on preoperative CT scans and classified according to Paprosky criteria of Radiolucent lines and periprosthetic gaps; implant mobilization and osteolysis were evaluated by X-ray. An database was created and statistical analyses were performed with SPSS software (IBM SPSS Statistics for Windows, version 23.0). Statistical analyses were carried out using the Student's test for independent and paired samples. A value of < 0.05 was considered statistically significant and cumulative survival was calculated by the Kaplan-Meier method.

Results: The mean follow-up was 87.6 ± 25.6 mo (range 3-120 mo). 25 cases (43.1%) were classified as minor defects, and 33 cases (56.9%) as major defects. The preoperative HHS rating improved significantly from a mean of 40.7 ± 6.1 (range: 29-53) before revision, to a mean of 85.8 ± 6.1 (range: 70-94) at the end of the follow-up (Student's test for paired samples: < 0.001). Considering HHS only at the end of follow-up, no statistically significant difference was observed between patients with a major or minor defect (Student's test for independent samples: > 0.05). Radiolucent lines were found in 4 implants (6.9%). Postoperative acetabular gaps were observed in 5 hips (8.6%). No signs of implant mobilization or areas of periprosthetic osteolysis were found in the x-rays at the final follow-up. Only 3 implants failed: 1 case of infection and 2 cases of instability. Defined as the end-point, cumulative survival at 10 years was 95% (for all reasons) and 100% for aseptic loosening of the acetabular component.

Conclusion: The medium-term use of prosthetic tantalum components in prosthetic hip revisions is safe and effective in a wide variety of acetabular bone defects.

Citing Articles

Does Using Highly Porous Tantalum in Revision Total Hip Arthroplasty Reduce the Rate of Periprosthetic Joint Infection? A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis.

Mirghaderi P, Eshraghi N, Sheikhbahaei E, Razzaghof M, Roustai-Geraylow K, Pouramini A Arthroplast Today. 2024; 25:101293.

PMID: 38298809 PMC: 10827600. DOI: 10.1016/j.artd.2023.101293.


Do Acetabular Buttress Augment Pose Risk to the Superior Gluteal Nerve? A Cadaveric Study.

Cole A, Zimmerman P, Sridhar M Arthroplast Today. 2021; 7:11-16.

PMID: 33521191 PMC: 7818611. DOI: 10.1016/j.artd.2020.11.011.

References
1.
Skytta E, Eskelinen A, Paavolainen P, Remes V . Early results of 827 trabecular metal revision shells in acetabular revision. J Arthroplasty. 2010; 26(3):342-5. DOI: 10.1016/j.arth.2010.01.106. View

2.
Del Gaizo D, Kancherla V, Sporer S, Paprosky W . Tantalum augments for Paprosky IIIA defects remain stable at midterm followup. Clin Orthop Relat Res. 2011; 470(2):395-401. PMC: 3254742. DOI: 10.1007/s11999-011-2170-x. View

3.
Lachiewicz P, Soileau E . Tantalum components in difficult acetabular revisions. Clin Orthop Relat Res. 2009; 468(2):454-8. PMC: 2806976. DOI: 10.1007/s11999-009-0940-5. View

4.
Zicat B, Engh C, Gokcen E . Patterns of osteolysis around total hip components inserted with and without cement. J Bone Joint Surg Am. 1995; 77(3):432-9. DOI: 10.2106/00004623-199503000-00013. View

5.
Van Kleunen J, Lee G, Lementowski P, Nelson C, Garino J . Acetabular revisions using trabecular metal cups and augments. J Arthroplasty. 2009; 24(6 Suppl):64-8. DOI: 10.1016/j.arth.2009.02.001. View