» Articles » PMID: 28804468

Individual Difference Factors in the Learning and Transfer of Patterning Discriminations

Overview
Journal Front Psychol
Date 2017 Aug 15
PMID 28804468
Citations 2
Authors
Affiliations
Soon will be listed here.
Abstract

In an associative patterning task, some people seem to focus more on learning an overarching rule, whereas others seem to focus on acquiring specific relations between the stimuli and outcomes involved. Building on earlier work, we further investigated which cognitive factors are involved in feature- vs. rule-based learning and generalization. To this end, we measured participants' tendency to generalize according to the rule of opposites after training on negative and positive patterning problems (i.e., A+/B+/AB- and C-/D-/CD+), their tendency to attend to global aspects or local details of stimuli, their systemizing disposition and their score on the Raven intelligence test. Our results suggest that while intelligence might have some influence on patterning learning and generalization, visual processing style and systemizing disposition do not. We discuss our findings in the light of previous observations on patterning.

Citing Articles

Memory Traces Diminished by Exercise Affect New Learning as Proactive Facilitation.

Li C, Li R, Zhou C Front Neurosci. 2020; 14:189.

PMID: 32210755 PMC: 7076129. DOI: 10.3389/fnins.2020.00189.


Fluid Abilities and Rule Learning: Patterning and Biconditional Discriminations.

Baetu I, Burns N, Yu E, Baker A J Intell. 2019; 6(1).

PMID: 31162434 PMC: 6480784. DOI: 10.3390/jintelligence6010007.

References
1.
Dienes Z . Bayesian Versus Orthodox Statistics: Which Side Are You On?. Perspect Psychol Sci. 2015; 6(3):274-90. DOI: 10.1177/1745691611406920. View

2.
Byrom N, Murphy R . Sampling capacity underlies individual differences in human associative learning. J Exp Psychol Anim Learn Cogn. 2014; 40(2):133-43. PMC: 4025161. DOI: 10.1037/xan0000012. View

3.
Little J, McDaniel M . Individual differences in category learning: memorization versus rule abstraction. Mem Cognit. 2014; 43(2):283-97. DOI: 10.3758/s13421-014-0475-1. View

4.
Billington J, Baron-Cohen S, Bor D . Systemizing influences attentional processes during the Navon task: an fMRI study. Neuropsychologia. 2007; 46(2):511-20. DOI: 10.1016/j.neuropsychologia.2007.09.003. View

5.
Winman A, Wennerholm P, Juslin P, Shanks D . Evidence for rule-based processes in the inverse base-rate effect. Q J Exp Psychol A. 2005; 58(5):789-815. DOI: 10.1080/02724980443000331. View