» Articles » PMID: 28804299

Sampling and Non-response Bias on Health-outcomes in Surveys of the Oldest Old

Overview
Journal Eur J Ageing
Publisher Springer
Specialty Geriatrics
Date 2017 Aug 15
PMID 28804299
Citations 36
Authors
Affiliations
Soon will be listed here.
Abstract

Surveys of the oldest old population are associated with several design issues. Place of residence and possible physical or cognitive impairments make it difficult to maintain a representative study population. Based on a Swedish nationally representative survey among individuals 77+, the present study analyze the potential bias of not using proxy interviews and excluding the institutionalized part of the population in surveys of the oldest old. The results show that compared to directly interviewed people living at home, institutionalized and proxy interviewed individuals were older, less educated and more likely to be female. They had more problems with health, mobility and ADL, and a significantly increased mortality risk. If the study had excluded the institutionalized part of the population and/or failed to use proxy interviews, the result would have been severely biased and resulted in underestimated prevalence rates for ADL, physical mobility and psychologic problems. This could not be compensated for weighting the data by age and sex. The results from this study imply that accurate population estimates require a representative study population, in which all individuals are included regardless of their living conditions, health status, and cognitive ability.

Citing Articles

Data quality in centenarian research: The proxy-centenarian relationship and item nonresponse in the SWISS100 study.

Zaccaria D, Falciola J, Masotti B, von Gunten A, Herrmann F, Jopp D PLoS One. 2025; 20(1):e0311847.

PMID: 39869597 PMC: 11771874. DOI: 10.1371/journal.pone.0311847.


Disability during the last ten years of life: evidence from a register-based study in Austria.

Stolz E, Schultz A, Zuschnegg J, Grossschadl F, Dorner T, Roller-Wirnsberger R Eur J Ageing. 2024; 21(1):28.

PMID: 39340589 PMC: 11438747. DOI: 10.1007/s10433-024-00823-z.


Education-related inequalities in disability during the last years of life: a full population register-based study.

Stolz E, Oberndorfer M, Freidl W J Epidemiol Community Health. 2024; 79(2):82-86.

PMID: 39266204 PMC: 11874278. DOI: 10.1136/jech-2024-222669.


Social Connectedness of Older Adults During the COVID-19 Pandemic: Evidence by Survey Mode and Respondent Dementia.

Cornwell B, Qu T, York Cornwell E J Gerontol B Psychol Sci Soc Sci. 2024; 80(Supplement_1):S28-S40.

PMID: 38577846 PMC: 11742142. DOI: 10.1093/geronb/gbae044.


Differential Item Functioning Along the Old Age Continuum: Contrasting Chronological Age With Contextual Variables in the Assessment of Gains and Losses Across Advanced Old Age.

Kaspar R, Diehl M, Wahl H J Gerontol B Psychol Sci Soc Sci. 2024; 79(6).

PMID: 38551032 PMC: 11067810. DOI: 10.1093/geronb/gbae046.


References
1.
Neumann P, Araki S, Gutterman E . The use of proxy respondents in studies of older adults: lessons, challenges, and opportunities. J Am Geriatr Soc. 2000; 48(12):1646-54. DOI: 10.1111/j.1532-5415.2000.tb03877.x. View

2.
Crimmins E, Saito Y . Trends in healthy life expectancy in the United States, 1970-1990: gender, racial, and educational differences. Soc Sci Med. 2001; 52(11):1629-41. DOI: 10.1016/s0277-9536(00)00273-2. View

3.
Freedman V, Aykan H, Martin L . Another look at aggregate changes in severe cognitive impairment: further investigation into the cumulative effects of three survey design issues. J Gerontol B Psychol Sci Soc Sci. 2002; 57(2):S126-31. DOI: 10.1093/geronb/57.2.s126. View

4.
Freedman V, Crimmins E, Schoeni R, Spillman B, Aykan H, Kramarow E . Resolving inconsistencies in trends in old-age disability: report from a technical working group. Demography. 2004; 41(3):417-41. DOI: 10.1353/dem.2004.0022. View

5.
Chatfield M, Brayne C, Matthews F . A systematic literature review of attrition between waves in longitudinal studies in the elderly shows a consistent pattern of dropout between differing studies. J Clin Epidemiol. 2005; 58(1):13-9. DOI: 10.1016/j.jclinepi.2004.05.006. View