» Articles » PMID: 28803034

Variations in the Costs of Radical Cystectomy for Bladder Cancer in the USA

Overview
Journal Eur Urol
Specialty Urology
Date 2017 Aug 14
PMID 28803034
Citations 29
Authors
Affiliations
Soon will be listed here.
Abstract

Background: Radical cystectomy (RC) for muscle-invasive bladder cancer (BCa) has potential for serious complications, prolonged length of stay and readmissions-all of which may increase costs. Although variations in outcomes are well described, less is known about determinants driving variation in costs.

Objective: To assess surgeon- and hospital-level variations in costs and predictors of high- and low-cost RC.

Design, Setting, And Participants: Cohort study of 23 173 patients who underwent RC for BCa in 208 hospitals in the USA from 2003 to 2015 in the Premier Healthcare Database.

Outcome Measurements And Statistical Analysis: Ninety-day direct hospital costs; multilevel hierarchal linear models were constructed to evaluate contributions of each variable to costs.

Results And Limitations: Mean 90-d direct hospital costs per RC was $39 651 (standard deviation $34 427), of which index hospitalization accounted for 87.8% ($34 803) and postdischarge readmission(s) accounted for 12.2% ($4847). Postoperative complications contributed most to cost variations (84.5%), followed by patient (49.8%; eg, Charlson Comorbidity Index [CCI], 40.5%), surgical (33.2%; eg, year of surgery [25.0%]), and hospital characteristics (8.0%). Patients who suffered minor complications (odds ratio [OR] 2.63, 95% confidence interval [CI]: 2.03-3.40), nonfatal major complications (OR 12.7, 95% CI: 9.63-16.8), and mortality (OR 13.5, 95% CI: 9.35-19.4, all p<0.001) were significantly associated with high costs. As for low-cost surgery, sicker patients (CCI=2: OR 0.41, 95% CI: 0.29-0.59; CCI=1: OR 0.58, 95% CI: 0.46-0.75, both p<0.001), those who underwent continent diversion (vs incontinent diversion: OR 0.29, 95% CI: 0.16-0.53, p<0.001), and earlier period of surgery were inversely associated with low costs.

Conclusions: This study provides insight into the determinants of costs for RC. Postoperative morbidity, patient comorbidities, and year of surgery contributed most to observed variations in costs, while other hospital- and surgical-related characteristics such as volume, use of robot assistance, and type of urinary diversion contribute less to outlier costs.

Patient Summary: Efforts to address high surgical cost must be tailored to specific determinants of high and low costs for each operation. In contrast to robot-assisted radical prostatectomy where surgeon factors predominate, high costs in radical cystectomy were primarily determined by postoperative complication and patient comorbidities.

Citing Articles

Cost of Care in Open Cystectomy Patients Across Time and Space: Does it matter?.

Sun H, Prunty M, Isali I, Mahran A, Ginsburg K, Markt S Bladder Cancer. 2024; 7(4):439-447.

PMID: 38993992 PMC: 11181807. DOI: 10.3233/BLC-211580.


Impact of outcomes and costs for implementation of robotic radical cystectomy with full intracorporeal urinary diversion.

Rahota R, Beauval J, Gautier J, Almeras C, Garnault V, Loison G Cent European J Urol. 2024; 76(4):305-310.

PMID: 38230318 PMC: 10789279. DOI: 10.5173/ceju.2023.203.


Definitions, End Points, and Clinical Trial Designs for Bladder Cancer: Recommendations From the Society for Immunotherapy of Cancer and the International Bladder Cancer Group.

Kamat A, Apolo A, Babjuk M, Bivalacqua T, Black P, Buckley R J Clin Oncol. 2023; 41(35):5437-5447.

PMID: 37793077 PMC: 10713193. DOI: 10.1200/JCO.23.00307.


Cost-Effectiveness and Economic Impact of Bladder Cancer Management: An Updated Review of the Literature.

Joyce D, Sharma V, Williams S Pharmacoeconomics. 2023; 41(7):751-769.

PMID: 37088844 DOI: 10.1007/s40273-023-01273-8.


Postoperative complications and hospital costs following open radical cystectomy: A retrospective study.

Weinberg L, Aitken S, Kaldas P, Fletcher L, Lloyd-Donald P, Le P PLoS One. 2023; 18(2):e0282324.

PMID: 36827411 PMC: 9956632. DOI: 10.1371/journal.pone.0282324.