» Articles » PMID: 28800635

Design of a Cosmetic Glove Stiffness Compensation Mechanism for Toddler-sized Hand Prostheses

Overview
Journal PLoS One
Date 2017 Aug 12
PMID 28800635
Authors
Affiliations
Soon will be listed here.
Abstract

The addition of a cosmetic glove to an upper limb prosthesis has a distinct effect on the cosmetic value, but its viscoelastic behaviour adds a substantial amount of stiffness and hysteresis to the system. As a result, the overall usability of the prosthesis is degraded. A novel negative stiffness element is designed to compensate for the cosmetic glove's stiffness. A combination of linear helical springs and the concept of rolling link mechanisms has resulted in a Rolling Stiffness Compensation Mechanism (RSCM). Results show that the RSCM is capable of exerting a progressive negative stiffness characteristic and can be built small enough to fit inside a 33 mm diameter wrist. Using the RSCM, an otherwise voluntary opening toddler-sized prosthesis is converted into a voluntary closing device, reducing maximum operation forces down to 40 N with a combined efficiency of 52%. Further adjustments to the design are possible to further improve the efficiency of the mechanism. Moreover, changes in geometric relations of the mechanism offers possibilities for a wide range of prostheses and other applications.

References
1.
Dembo T, TANE-BASKIN E . The noticeability of the cosmetic glove. Artif Limbs. 1955; 2(2):47-56. View

2.
Smit G, Bongers R, Van der Sluis C, Plettenburg D . Efficiency of voluntary opening hand and hook prosthetic devices: 24 years of development?. J Rehabil Res Dev. 2012; 49(4):523-34. DOI: 10.1682/jrrd.2011.07.0125. View

3.
Davies E, Douglas W, Small A . A cosmetic functional hand incorporating a silicone rubber cosmetic glove. Prosthet Orthot Int. 1977; 1(2):89-93. DOI: 10.3109/03093647709164613. View

4.
Krouskop T, Newell Jr P, LEAVITT L . Cosmetic covers for lower-limb prostheses. Bull Prosthet Res. 1974; :411-4. View

5.
Biddiss E, Chau T . Upper limb prosthesis use and abandonment: a survey of the last 25 years. Prosthet Orthot Int. 2007; 31(3):236-57. DOI: 10.1080/03093640600994581. View