» Articles » PMID: 28800492

Adding Abiraterone to Androgen Deprivation Therapy in Men with Metastatic Hormone-sensitive Prostate Cancer: A systematic Review and Meta-analysis

Abstract

Background: There is a need to synthesise the results of numerous randomised controlled trials evaluating the addition of therapies to androgen deprivation therapy (ADT) for men with metastatic hormone-sensitive prostate cancer (mHSPC). This systematic review aims to assess the effects of adding abiraterone acetate plus prednisone/prednisolone (AAP) to ADT.

Methods: Using our framework for adaptive meta-analysis (FAME), we started the review process before trials had been reported and worked collaboratively with trial investigators to anticipate when eligible trial results would emerge. Thus, we could determine the earliest opportunity for reliable meta-analysis and take account of unavailable trials in interpreting results. We searched multiple sources for trials comparing AAP plus ADT versus ADT in men with mHSPC. We obtained results for the primary outcome of overall survival (OS), secondary outcomes of clinical/radiological progression-free survival (PFS) and grade III-IV and grade V toxicity direct from trial teams. Hazard ratios (HRs) for the effects of AAP plus ADT on OS and PFS, Peto Odds Ratios (Peto ORs) for the effects on acute toxicity and interaction HRs for the effects on OS by patient subgroups were combined across trials using fixed-effect meta-analysis.

Findings: We identified three eligible trials, one of which was still recruiting (PEACE-1 (NCT01957436)). Results from the two remaining trials (LATITUDE (NCT01715285) and STAMPEDE (NCT00268476)), representing 82% of all men randomised to AAP plus ADT versus ADT (without docetaxel in either arm), showed a highly significant 38% reduction in the risk of death with AAP plus ADT (HR = 0.62, 95% confidence interval [CI] = 0.53-0.71, p = 0.55 × 10), that translates into a 14% absolute improvement in 3-year OS. Despite differences in PFS definitions across trials, we also observed a consistent and highly significant 55% reduction in the risk of clinical/radiological PFS (HR = 0.45, 95% CI = 0.40-0.51, p = 0.66 × 10) with the addition of AAP, that translates to a 28% absolute improvement at 3 years. There was no evidence of a difference in the OS benefit by Gleason sum score, performance status or nodal status, but the size of the benefit may vary by age. There were more grade III-IV acute cardiac, vascular and hepatic toxicities with AAP plus ADT but no excess of other toxicities or death.

Interpretation: Adding AAP to ADT is a clinically effective treatment option for men with mHSPC, offering an alternative to docetaxel for men who are starting treatment for the first time. Future research will need to address which of these two agents or whether their combination is most effective, and for whom.

Citing Articles

The Overall Survival and Safety of Men with Metastatic Hormone-Sensitive Prostate Cancer Treated with Combination Therapy of Novel Androgen Receptor Antagonists and Androgen-Deprivation Therapy: A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis.

Wu X, Han H, Zhang C, Song W J Oncol. 2024; 2022:6211059.

PMID: 39280891 PMC: 11401698. DOI: 10.1155/2022/6211059.


The Lancet Commission on prostate cancer: planning for the surge in cases.

James N, Tannock I, Ndow J, Feng F, Gillessen S, Ali S Lancet. 2024; 403(10437):1683-1722.

PMID: 38583453 PMC: 7617369. DOI: 10.1016/S0140-6736(24)00651-2.


Efficacy of Treatment for Metastatic Hormone-Sensitive Prostate Cancer: An Umbrella Review of Systematic Reviews and Meta-Analyses.

Sirisreetreerux P, Poprom N, Numthavaj P, Rattanasiri S, Thakkinstian A Cancers (Basel). 2023; 15(24).

PMID: 38136260 PMC: 10742269. DOI: 10.3390/cancers15245714.


Research protocol to identify progression and death amongst patients with metastatic hormone-sensitive prostate cancer treated with available treatments: PIONEER IMI's "big data for better outcomes" program.

Rivas J, Nicoletti R, Ibanez L, Steinbeisser C, De Meulder B, Golozar A Int J Surg Protoc. 2023; 27(3):122-129.

PMID: 38046899 PMC: 10688536. DOI: 10.1097/SP9.0000000000000009.


EAU Biochemical Recurrence Risk Classification and PSA Kinetics Have No Value for Patient Selection in PSMA-Radioguided Surgery (PSMA-RGS) for Oligorecurrent Prostate Cancer.

Falkenbach F, Ambrosini F, Tennstedt P, Eiber M, Heck M, Preisser F Cancers (Basel). 2023; 15(20).

PMID: 37894375 PMC: 10605818. DOI: 10.3390/cancers15205008.


References
1.
Higgins J, Thompson S . Quantifying heterogeneity in a meta-analysis. Stat Med. 2002; 21(11):1539-58. DOI: 10.1002/sim.1186. View

2.
Labrie F, Dupont A, Belanger A, Giguere M, LaCoursiere Y, Emond J . Combination therapy with flutamide and castration (LHRH agonist or orchiectomy) in advanced prostate cancer: a marked improvement in response and survival. J Steroid Biochem. 1985; 23(5B):833-41. DOI: 10.1016/s0022-4731(85)80024-8. View

3.
Fisher D, Carpenter J, Morris T, Freeman S, Tierney J . Meta-analytical methods to identify who benefits most from treatments: daft, deluded, or deft approach?. BMJ. 2017; 356:j573. PMC: 5421441. DOI: 10.1136/bmj.j573. View

4.
Yusuf S, Peto R, Lewis J, Collins R, Sleight P . Beta blockade during and after myocardial infarction: an overview of the randomized trials. Prog Cardiovasc Dis. 1985; 27(5):335-71. DOI: 10.1016/s0033-0620(85)80003-7. View

5.
Gillessen S, Attard G, Beer T, Beltran H, Bossi A, Bristow R . Management of Patients with Advanced Prostate Cancer: The Report of the Advanced Prostate Cancer Consensus Conference APCCC 2017. Eur Urol. 2017; 73(2):178-211. DOI: 10.1016/j.eururo.2017.06.002. View