» Articles » PMID: 28799077

Arbuscular Mycorrhizal Fungus Inoculation Reduces the Drought-resistance Advantage of Endophyte-infected Versus Endophyte-free Leymus Chinensis

Overview
Journal Mycorrhiza
Date 2017 Aug 12
PMID 28799077
Citations 10
Authors
Affiliations
Soon will be listed here.
Abstract

Grasses can be infected simultaneously by endophytic fungi and arbuscular mycorrhizal (AM) fungi. In this study, we tested the hypothesis that endophyte-associated drought resistance of a native grass was affected by an AM fungus. In a greenhouse experiment, we compared the performance of endophyte-infected (EI) and endophyte-free (EF) Leymus chinensis, a dominant species native to the Inner Mongolia steppe, under altered water and AM fungus availability. The results showed that endophyte infection significantly increased drought resistance of the host grass, but the beneficial effects were reduced by AM fungus inoculation. In the mycorrhizal-non-inoculated (MF) treatment, EI plants accumulated significantly more biomass, had greater proline and total phenolic concentration, and lower malondialdehyde concentration than EF plants. In the mycorrhizal-inoculation (MI) treatment, however, no significant difference occurred in either growth or physiological characters measured between EI and EF plants. AM fungus inoculation enhanced drought resistance of EF plants but had no significant effect on drought resistance of EI plants, thus AM fungus inoculation reduced the difference between EI and EF plants. Our findings highlight the importance of interactions among multiple microorganisms for plant performance under drought stress.

Citing Articles

Genome-wide identification of nitrate transporter 1/peptide transporter family () induced by arbuscular mycorrhiza in the maize genome.

Xu Q, Wang Y, Sun W, Li Y, Xu Y, Cheng B Physiol Mol Biol Plants. 2024; 30(5):757-774.

PMID: 38846454 PMC: 11150374. DOI: 10.1007/s12298-024-01464-3.


The Interaction between Arbuscular Mycorrhizal Fungi (AMF) and Grass Endophyte () on Host Plants: A Review.

Shen Y, Duan T J Fungi (Basel). 2024; 10(3).

PMID: 38535183 PMC: 10971549. DOI: 10.3390/jof10030174.


Endophytic infection increases the belowground over-yielding effects of the host grass community mainly by increasing the complementary effects.

Qu Y, Qin T, Zhang J, Deng Y, Yu X, Wei X Front Plant Sci. 2023; 14:1191904.

PMID: 37396649 PMC: 10311445. DOI: 10.3389/fpls.2023.1191904.


Arbuscular Mycorrhizal Fungi Improve the Growth, Water Status, and Nutrient Uptake of and the Soil Nutrient Stoichiometry under Drought Stress and Recovery.

Xiao X, Liao X, Yan Q, Xie Y, Chen J, Liang G J Fungi (Basel). 2023; 9(3).

PMID: 36983489 PMC: 10057927. DOI: 10.3390/jof9030321.


endophyte interacts with saline-alkali stress to alter root phosphorus-solubilizing fungal and bacterial communities in tall fescue.

Liu H, Tang H, Ni X, Zhang J, Zhang X Front Microbiol. 2023; 13:1027428.

PMID: 36620058 PMC: 9815497. DOI: 10.3389/fmicb.2022.1027428.


References
1.
Saikkonen K, Lehtonen P, Helander M, Koricheva J, Faeth S . Model systems in ecology: dissecting the endophyte-grass literature. Trends Plant Sci. 2006; 11(9):428-33. DOI: 10.1016/j.tplants.2006.07.001. View

2.
Kogel K, Franken P, Huckelhoven R . Endophyte or parasite--what decides?. Curr Opin Plant Biol. 2006; 9(4):358-63. DOI: 10.1016/j.pbi.2006.05.001. View

3.
Muller C, Krauss J . Symbiosis between grasses and asexual fungal endophytes. Curr Opin Plant Biol. 2005; 8(4):450-6. DOI: 10.1016/j.pbi.2005.05.007. View

4.
Clay K, Schardl C . Evolutionary origins and ecological consequences of endophyte symbiosis with grasses. Am Nat. 2008; 160 Suppl 4:S99-S127. DOI: 10.1086/342161. View

5.
White Jr J, Torres M . Is plant endophyte-mediated defensive mutualism the result of oxidative stress protection?. Physiol Plant. 2009; 138(4):440-6. DOI: 10.1111/j.1399-3054.2009.01332.x. View