» Articles » PMID: 28793530

Anodization of WO₃-Decorated TiO₂ Nanotube Arrays for Efficient Mercury Removal

Overview
Publisher MDPI
Date 2017 Aug 11
PMID 28793530
Citations 2
Authors
Affiliations
Soon will be listed here.
Abstract

WO₃-decorated TiO₂ nanotube arrays were successfully synthesized using an anodization method in ethylene glycol electrolyte with dissolved H₂O₂ and ammonium fluoride in amounts ranging from 0 to 0.5 wt %. Anodization was carried out at a voltage of 40 V for a duration of 60 min. By using the less stable tungsten as the cathode material instead of the conventionally used platinum electrode, tungsten will form dissolved ions (W) in the electrolyte which will then move toward the titanium foil and form a coherent deposit on the titanium foil. The fluoride ion content was controlled to determine the optimum chemical dissolution rate of TiO₂ during anodization to produce a uniform nanotubular structure of TiO₂ film. Nanotube arrays were then characterized using FESEM, EDAX, XRD, as well as Raman spectroscopy. Based on the FESEM images obtained, nanotube arrays with an average pore diameter of up to 65 nm and a length of 1.8 µm were produced. The tungsten element in the samples was confirmed by EDAX results which showed varying tungsten content from 0.22 to 2.30 at%. XRD and Raman results showed the anatase phase of TiO₂ after calcination at 400 °C for 4 h in air atmosphere. The mercury removal efficiency of the nanotube arrays was investigated by photoirradiating samples dipped in mercury chloride solution with TUV (Tube ultraviolet) 96W UV-B Germicidal light. The nanotubes with the highest aspect ratio (15.9) and geometric surface area factor (92.0) exhibited the best mercury removal performance due to a larger active surface area, which enables more Hg to adsorb onto the catalyst surface to undergo reduction to Hg⁰. The incorporation of WO₃ species onto TiO₂ nanotubes also improved the mercury removal performance due to improved charge separation and decreased charge carrier recombination because of the charge transfer from the conduction band of TiO₂ to the conduction band of WO₃.

Citing Articles

Synthesis of TiO-ZnS nanocomposites sacrificial template sulfidation and their ethanol gas-sensing performance.

Liang Y, Xu N RSC Adv. 2022; 8(40):22437-22446.

PMID: 35539706 PMC: 9081378. DOI: 10.1039/c8ra04157a.


Mechanism of Mercury Adsorption and Oxidation by Oxygen over the CeO₂ (111) Surface: A DFT Study.

Zhao L, Wu Y, Han J, Lu Q, Yang Y, Zhang L Materials (Basel). 2018; 11(4).

PMID: 29570658 PMC: 5951331. DOI: 10.3390/ma11040485.

References
1.
Ekinci M, Ceylan E, Keles S, Cagatay H, Apil A, Tanyildiz B . Toxic effects of chronic mercury exposure on the retinal nerve fiber layer and macular and choroidal thickness in industrial mercury battery workers. Med Sci Monit. 2014; 20:1284-90. PMC: 4136938. DOI: 10.12659/MSM.890756. View

2.
Cipriano A, Miller C, Liu H . Anodic growth and biomedical applications of TiO2 nanotubes. J Biomed Nanotechnol. 2015; 10(10):2977-3003. DOI: 10.1166/jbn.2014.1927. View

3.
Wang J, Zheng S, Shao Y, Liu J, Xu Z, Zhu D . Amino-functionalized Fe(3)O(4)@SiO(2) core-shell magnetic nanomaterial as a novel adsorbent for aqueous heavy metals removal. J Colloid Interface Sci. 2010; 349(1):293-9. DOI: 10.1016/j.jcis.2010.05.010. View

4.
Zhang F, Nriagu J, Itoh H . Mercury removal from water using activated carbons derived from organic sewage sludge. Water Res. 2005; 39(2-3):389-95. DOI: 10.1016/j.watres.2004.09.027. View

5.
Rafati-Rahimzadeh M, Rafati-Rahimzadeh M, Kazemi S, Moghadamnia A . Current approaches of the management of mercury poisoning: need of the hour. Daru. 2014; 22:46. PMC: 4055906. DOI: 10.1186/2008-2231-22-46. View