» Articles » PMID: 28792514

Network Analysis for Science and Technology Management: Evidence from Tuberculosis Research in Fiocruz, Brazil

Overview
Journal PLoS One
Date 2017 Aug 10
PMID 28792514
Citations 8
Authors
Affiliations
Soon will be listed here.
Abstract

Collaborative networks are of great value for science and technology (S&T) institutions as a way of sharing, generating and disseminating new knowledge that could ultimately lead to innovations. Driven by the need to assess the contribution and effectiveness of these networks in informing S&T management, we explored the evolution and dynamics of tuberculosis scientific networks involving the Oswaldo Cruz Foundation (Fiocruz), the major public health S&T Institution in Brazil. Social network analysis (SNA) was used to produce a 10-year (2005-2009, 2010-2014) retrospective longitudinal mapping of Brazilian tuberculosis research networks within the country and internationally, highlighting Fiocruz collaborations. Co-authorship analysis showed a significant expansion of collaboration in Brazil and the role of Fiocruz and other leading national institutions in maintaining connectivity, facilitating knowledge exchange and reducing network vulnerability. It also identified influential researchers that can act as information leaders and support strategic decisions. When we focused on networks inside the institution, the analysis showed a clear discontinuation between the clinical and the public health research areas, which needs specific internal policies to improve collaborations since outcomes in TB are expected to provide better diagnostic tools and more effective treatments. The approach provides evidence to support S&T management by pinpointing: key central institutions maintaining network connectivity; most influential researchers that can act as advisors/experts for investment and induction policies; key Fiocruz researchers that could improve information exchange, systems integration and innovation within the institution; opportunities for synergy between internal research groups working in complementary areas. In summary, we observed that SNA parameters proved to be a valuable tool that, along with other indicators, can strengthen knowledge platforms to support S&T management efforts.

Citing Articles

Strengthening research networks: Insights from a clinical research network in Brazil.

Lopes J, Couto A, Daher A, Fonseca B PLoS One. 2024; 19(8):e0307817.

PMID: 39088463 PMC: 11293707. DOI: 10.1371/journal.pone.0307817.


Hotspots and Global Trends of Nursing Research on Mobile Applications in Nursing From 2012 to 2023: A Bibliometric Analysis.

Li T, Huang T, Gao J Comput Inform Nurs. 2024; 42(9):675-683.

PMID: 38888455 PMC: 11458084. DOI: 10.1097/CIN.0000000000001163.


Deciphering drug discovery and microbial pathogenesis research in tuberculosis during the two decades of postgenomic era using entity mining approach.

Kumar V, Shankar G, Akhter Y Arch Microbiol. 2023; 206(1):46.

PMID: 38153595 DOI: 10.1007/s00203-023-03776-6.


Topic Analysis and Mapping of Tuberculosis Research Using Text Mining and Co-Word Analysis.

Dastani M, Mohammadzadeh A, Mardaneh J, Ahmadi R Tuberc Res Treat. 2022; 2022:8039046.

PMID: 36398041 PMC: 9666010. DOI: 10.1155/2022/8039046.


The scientific publication of the Memórias do Instituto Oswaldo Cruz (1909-2020): a history of contribution to the biomedical sciences.

Mota F, Braga L, Cabral B, Lopes R, Alves L Mem Inst Oswaldo Cruz. 2022; 117:e210376.

PMID: 35703661 PMC: 9196065. DOI: 10.1590/0074-02760210376.


References
1.
Adams J . Collaborations: The rise of research networks. Nature. 2012; 490(7420):335-6. DOI: 10.1038/490335a. View

2.
Barabasi , ALBERT . Emergence of scaling in random networks. Science. 1999; 286(5439):509-12. DOI: 10.1126/science.286.5439.509. View

3.
Lienhardt C, Lonnroth K, Menzies D, Balasegaram M, Chakaya J, Cobelens F . Translational Research for Tuberculosis Elimination: Priorities, Challenges, and Actions. PLoS Med. 2016; 13(3):e1001965. PMC: 4775029. DOI: 10.1371/journal.pmed.1001965. View

4.
Vanderelst D . Social Network Analysis As a Tool for Research Policy. PLoS Negl Trop Dis. 2016; 9(12):e0004266. PMC: 4697811. DOI: 10.1371/journal.pntd.0004266. View

5.
Valente T . Network interventions. Science. 2012; 337(6090):49-53. DOI: 10.1126/science.1217330. View