» Articles » PMID: 28787514

Results of Intraoperative Manual Cyclotorsion Compensation for Myopic Astigmatism in Patients Undergoing Small Incision Lenticule Extraction (SMILE)

Overview
Journal J Refract Surg
Date 2017 Aug 9
PMID 28787514
Citations 31
Authors
Affiliations
Soon will be listed here.
Abstract

Purpose: To study the safety, efficacy, and outcomes of manual cyclotorsion compensation in small incision lenticule extraction (SMILE) for myopic astigmatism.

Methods: Eligible patients with myopia from -1.00 to -10.00 diopters (D) spherical equivalent with a minimum astigmatism of 0.75 D undergoing SMILE were included. Intraoperative cyclotorsion compensation was performed by gently rotating the cone and aligning the 0° to 180° limbal marks with the horizontal axis of the reticule of the right eye piece of the microscope of the femtosecond laser after activating the suction.

Results: In this study, 81 left eyes from 81 patients were analyzed for vector analysis of astigmatism. The mean cyclotorsion was 5.64° ± 2.55° (range: 2° to 12°). No significant differences were found for surgically induced astigmatism, difference vector, angle of error (AE), correction index, magnitude of error, index of success (IOS), and flattening index between 2 weeks and 3 months postoperatively (P > .05). The eyes were categorized into low (≤ 1.50 D, n = 37) and high (> 1.50 D, n = 44) cylinder groups. At 3 months, intergroup analysis showed a comparable correction index of 0.97 for the low and 0.93 for the high cylinder groups, suggesting a slight undercorrection of 3% and 7%, respectively (P = .14). However, the AE and IOS were significantly lower in the high compared to the low cylinder group (P = .032 and .024 for AE and IOS, respectively), suggesting better alignment of the treatment in the high cylinder group. However, the mean uncorrected distance visual acuity of both groups was comparable (P = .21), suggesting good visual outcomes in the low cylinder group despite a less favorable IOS.

Conclusions: Manual compensation may be a safe, feasible, and effective approach to refine the results of astigmatism with SMILE, especially in higher degrees of cylinders. [J Refract Surg. 2017;33(8):506-512.].

Citing Articles

Comparison of Visual and Refractive Outcomes of Keratorefractive Lenticule Extraction for Compound Myopic Astigmatism Between VisuMax and VISUMAX 800.

Varman A, Varman A, Balakumar D Clin Ophthalmol. 2024; 18:3557-3566.

PMID: 39635258 PMC: 11616419. DOI: 10.2147/OPTH.S492552.


Comparative Analysis of Corneal Wound Healing: Differential Molecular Responses in Tears Following PRK, FS-LASIK, and SMILE Procedures.

Janiszewska-Bil D, Grabarek B, Lyssek-Boron A, Kielbasinska A, Kuraszewska B, Wylegala E Biomedicines. 2024; 12(10).

PMID: 39457602 PMC: 11505177. DOI: 10.3390/biomedicines12102289.


Feasibility study of treatment of mixed astigmatism with small-incision lenticule extraction (SMILE) by using research software.

Ganesh S, Brar S, Bose S, Shah M Indian J Ophthalmol. 2024; 72(7):1056-1063.

PMID: 38905464 PMC: 11329817. DOI: 10.4103/IJO.IJO_1273_23.


Kerato-lenticule Extraction (KLex) surgeries - Current perspectives.

Vanathi M Indian J Ophthalmol. 2024; 72(4):459-460.

PMID: 38546463 PMC: 11149513. DOI: 10.4103/IJO.IJO_675_24.


Effect of Cyclotorsion Compensation in Small Incision Lenticule Extraction Surgery for the Correction of Myopic Astigmatism: A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis.

Yang X, Liu Y, Xiao K, Song Q, Xu Y, Li J Ophthalmol Ther. 2024; 13(5):1271-1288.

PMID: 38498276 PMC: 11039593. DOI: 10.1007/s40123-024-00921-2.