» Articles » PMID: 28784120

Willingness to Pay and Willingness to Accept in a Patient-centered Blood Pressure Control Study

Overview
Publisher Biomed Central
Specialty Health Services
Date 2017 Aug 9
PMID 28784120
Citations 6
Authors
Affiliations
Soon will be listed here.
Abstract

Background: Elevated blood pressure is a major risk factor for cardiovascular disease and stroke but patients often discount recommended behavioral changes and prescribed medications. While effective interventions to promote adherence have been developed, cost-effectiveness from the patient's perspective, has not been well studied. The valuation of patient time and out of pocket expenses should be included while performing cost effectiveness evaluation. The Achieve BP study uses the contingent valuation method to assess willingness to accept (WTA) and willingness to pay (WTP) among patients with a history of uncontrolled blood pressure discharged from an urban emergency department and enrolled in a larger randomized controlled trial.

Methods: WTA and WTP were assessed by asking patients a series of questions about time and travel costs and time value related to their study participation. A survey was conducted during the final study visit with patients to investigate the effectiveness of a kiosk-based educational intervention on blood pressure control. All study patients, regardless of study arm, received the same clinical protocol of commonly prescribed antihypertensive medication and met with research clinicians four times as part of the study procedures.

Results: Thirty-eight patients were offered the opportunity to participate in the cost-effectiveness study and all completed the survey. Statistical comparisons revealed these 38 patients were similar in representation to the entire RCT study population. All 38 (100.0%) were African-American, with an average age of 49.1 years; 55.3% were male, 21.1% were married, 78.9% had a high school or higher education, and 44.7% were working. 55.9% did not have a primary care provider and 50.0% did not have health insurance. Time price linear regression analysis was performed to estimate predictors of WTA and WTP.

Conclusions: WTP and WTA may generate different results, and the elasticities were proportional to the estimated coefficients, with WTP about twice as responsive as WTA. An additional feature for health services research was successful piloting in a clinical setting of a brief patient-centered cost effectiveness survey.

Trial Registration: https://clinicaltrials.gov . Registration Number NCT02069015 . Registered February 19, 2014 (Retrospectively registered).

Citing Articles

Willingness to Pay (WTP) for Newer Treatment Options for Diabetes: A Study Among Patients at a Tertiary Care Centre.

Vaidya S, Atal S, Joshi R Cureus. 2024; 16(3):e56103.

PMID: 38618372 PMC: 11009894. DOI: 10.7759/cureus.56103.


Patient preferences and cost-benefit of hypertension and hyperlipidemia collaborative management model between pharmacies and primary care in Portugal: A discrete choice experiment alongside a trial (USFarmácia®).

Costa S, Guerreiro J, Teixeira I, Helling D, Mateus C, Pereira J PLoS One. 2023; 18(10):e0292308.

PMID: 37796918 PMC: 10553278. DOI: 10.1371/journal.pone.0292308.


Recruitment, Retention, and Future Direction for a Heart Health Education and Risk Reduction Intervention Led by Community Health Workers in an African American Majority City.

Gleason-Comstock J, Calhoun C, Mozeb G, Louis C, Hill A, Locke B J Racial Ethn Health Disparities. 2022; 10(3):1432-1440.

PMID: 35641734 PMC: 9154027. DOI: 10.1007/s40615-022-01329-z.


Musings on Patient Willingness to Pay.

Baumgardner D J Patient Cent Res Rev. 2021; 8(2):83-85.

PMID: 33898639 PMC: 8060037.


Determinants of hypertension treatment adherence among a Chinese population using the therapeutic adherence scale for hypertensive patients.

Pan J, Wu L, Wang H, Lei T, Hu B, Xue X Medicine (Baltimore). 2019; 98(27):e16116.

PMID: 31277112 PMC: 6635171. DOI: 10.1097/MD.0000000000016116.


References
1.
Martin-Fernandez J, Gomez-Gascon T, Oliva-Moreno J, Del Cura-Gonzalez M, Dominguez-Bidagor J, Beamud-Lagos M . Perception of the economic value of primary care services: a Willingness to Pay study. Health Policy. 2009; 94(3):266-72. DOI: 10.1016/j.healthpol.2009.11.001. View

2.
Coulter A, Ellins J . Effectiveness of strategies for informing, educating, and involving patients. BMJ. 2007; 335(7609):24-7. PMC: 1910640. DOI: 10.1136/bmj.39246.581169.80. View

3.
Murray C, Frenk J . A framework for assessing the performance of health systems. Bull World Health Organ. 2000; 78(6):717-31. PMC: 2560787. View

4.
Gleason-Comstock J, Streater A, Ager J, Goodman A, Brody A, Kivell L . Patient education and follow-up as an intervention for hypertensive patients discharged from an emergency department: a randomized control trial study protocol. BMC Emerg Med. 2015; 15:38. PMC: 4687379. DOI: 10.1186/s12873-015-0052-3. View

5.
Whynes D, Sach T . WTP and WTA: do people think differently?. Soc Sci Med. 2007; 65(5):946-57. DOI: 10.1016/j.socscimed.2007.04.014. View