» Articles » PMID: 28783810

Adaptation and Validation of a Pediatric Sequential Organ Failure Assessment Score and Evaluation of the Sepsis-3 Definitions in Critically Ill Children

Overview
Journal JAMA Pediatr
Date 2017 Aug 8
PMID 28783810
Citations 228
Authors
Affiliations
Soon will be listed here.
Abstract

Importance: The Third International Consensus Definitions for Sepsis and Septic Shock (Sepsis-3) uses the Sequential Organ Failure Assessment (SOFA) score to grade organ dysfunction in adult patients with suspected infection. However, the SOFA score is not adjusted for age and therefore not suitable for children.

Objectives: To adapt and validate a pediatric version of the SOFA score (pSOFA) in critically ill children and to evaluate the Sepsis-3 definitions in patients with confirmed or suspected infection.

Design, Setting, And Participants: This retrospective observational cohort study included all critically ill children 21 years or younger admitted to a 20-bed, multidisciplinary, tertiary pediatric intensive care unit between January 1, 2009 and August 1, 2016. Data on these children were obtained from an electronic health record database. The pSOFA score was developed by adapting the original SOFA score with age-adjusted cutoffs for the cardiovascular and renal systems and by expanding the respiratory criteria to include noninvasive surrogates of lung injury. Daily pSOFA scores were calculated from admission until day 28 of hospitalization, discharge, or death (whichever came first). Three additional pediatric organ dysfunction scores were calculated for comparison.

Exposures: Organ dysfunction measured by the pSOFA score, and sepsis and septic shock according to the Sepsis-3 definitions.

Main Outcomes And Measures: The primary outcome was in-hospital mortality. The daily pSOFA scores and additional pediatric organ dysfunction scores were compared. Performance was evaluated using the area under the curve. The pSOFA score was then used to assess the Sepsis-3 definitions in the subgroup of children with confirmed or suspected infection.

Results: In all, 6303 patients with 8711 encounters met inclusion criteria. Each encounter was treated independently. Of the 8482 survivors of hospital encounters, 4644 (54.7%) were male and the median (interquartile range [IQR]) age was 69 (17-156) months. Among the 229 nonsurvivors, 127 (55.4%) were male with a median (IQR) age of 43 (8-144) months. In-hospital mortality was 2.6%. The maximum pSOFA score had excellent discrimination for in-hospital mortality, with an area under the curve of 0.94 (95% CI, 0.92-0.95). The pSOFA score had a similar or better performance than other pediatric organ dysfunction scores. According to the Sepsis-3 definitions, 1231 patients (14.1%) were classified as having sepsis and had a mortality rate of 12.1%, and 347 (4.0%) had septic shock and a mortality rate of 32.3%. Patients with sepsis were more likely to die than patients with confirmed or suspected infection but no sepsis (odds ratio, 18; 95% CI, 11-28). Of the 229 patients who died during their hospitalization, 149 (65.0%) had sepsis or septic shock during their course.

Conclusions And Relevance: The pSOFA score was adapted and validated with age-adjusted variables in critically ill children. Using the pSOFA score, the Sepsis-3 definitions were assessed in children with confirmed or suspected infection. This study is the first assessment, to date, of the Sepsis-3 definitions in critically ill children. Use of these definitions in children is feasible and shows promising results.

Citing Articles

Rethinking Pediatric Sepsis and Septic Shock: Beyond International Consensus Criteria.

Shamavu G, Mohamoud F Pediatric Health Med Ther. 2025; 16:61-65.

PMID: 40065805 PMC: 11891069. DOI: 10.2147/PHMT.S496888.


Cytotoxic T-cell activation profile in critically ill children with malignancies and hemophagocytic lymphohistiocytosis.

Sun S, Liu Y, Zhao H, Miu Y, Huang X, Shen S Pediatr Res. 2025; .

PMID: 40044884 DOI: 10.1038/s41390-025-03962-w.


Association between hospital case volume and mortality in pediatric sepsis: A retrospective observational study using a Japanese nationwide inpatient database.

Ohki S, Otani M, Tomioka S, Komiya K, Kawamura H, Nakada T J Crit Care Med (Targu Mures). 2025; 11(1):87-94.

PMID: 40017481 PMC: 11864061. DOI: 10.2478/jccm-2025-0006.


Polymyxin B in The Treatment of Infections Caused by Multidrug-Resistant Gram-Negative Bacteria in Children: A Retrospective Case Series and A Literature Review.

Yan A, Pan X, Li S, Hu Y, Zhang H, Li D Infect Drug Resist. 2025; 18:965-977.

PMID: 39990784 PMC: 11846531. DOI: 10.2147/IDR.S509782.


The Phoenix Sepsis Score in Pediatric Oncology Patients With Sepsis at PICU Admission: Test of Performance in a European Multicenter Cohort, 2018-2020.

Wosten-van Asperen R, la Roi-Teeuw H, Tissing W, Jordan I, Dohna-Schwake C, Bottari G Pediatr Crit Care Med. 2025; 26(2):e177-e185.

PMID: 39982155 PMC: 11792984. DOI: 10.1097/PCC.0000000000003683.


References
1.
Shime N, Kageyama K, Ashida H, Tanaka Y . Application of modified sequential organ failure assessment score in children after cardiac surgery. J Cardiothorac Vasc Anesth. 2001; 15(4):463-8. DOI: 10.1053/jcan.2001.24983. View

2.
Ferreira F, Bota D, Bross A, Melot C, Vincent J . Serial evaluation of the SOFA score to predict outcome in critically ill patients. JAMA. 2001; 286(14):1754-8. DOI: 10.1001/jama.286.14.1754. View

3.
Leteurtre S, Martinot A, Duhamel A, Proulx F, Grandbastien B, Cotting J . Validation of the paediatric logistic organ dysfunction (PELOD) score: prospective, observational, multicentre study. Lancet. 2003; 362(9379):192-7. DOI: 10.1016/S0140-6736(03)13908-6. View

4.
Graciano A, Balko J, Rahn D, Ahmad N, Giroir B . The Pediatric Multiple Organ Dysfunction Score (P-MODS): development and validation of an objective scale to measure the severity of multiple organ dysfunction in critically ill children. Crit Care Med. 2005; 33(7):1484-91. DOI: 10.1097/01.ccm.0000170943.23633.47. View

5.
Fluss R, Faraggi D, Reiser B . Estimation of the Youden Index and its associated cutoff point. Biom J. 2005; 47(4):458-72. DOI: 10.1002/bimj.200410135. View