» Articles » PMID: 28775738

Social and Communicative Functions of Informed Consent Forms in East Asia and Beyond

Overview
Journal Front Genet
Date 2017 Aug 5
PMID 28775738
Citations 6
Authors
Affiliations
Soon will be listed here.
Abstract

The recent research and technology development in medical genomics has raised new issues that are profoundly different from those encountered in traditional clinical research for which informed consent was developed. Global initiatives for international collaboration and public participation in genomics research now face an increasing demand for new forms of informed consent which reflect local contexts. This article analyzes informed consent forms (ICFs) for genomic research formulated by four selected research programs and institutes in East Asia - the Medical Genome Science Program in Japan, Universiti Sains Malaysia Human Research Ethics Committee in Malaysia, and the Taiwan Biobank and the Taipei Medical University- Joint Institutional Review Board in Taiwan. The comparative text analysis highlights East Asian contexts as distinct from other regions by identifying communicative and social functions of consent forms. The communicative functions include re-contact options and offering interactive support for research participants, and setting opportunities for family or community engagement in the consent process. This implies that informed consent cannot be validated solely with the completion of a consent form at the initial stage of the research, and informed consent templates can facilitate interactions between researchers and participants through (even before and after) the research process. The social functions consist of informing participants of possible social risks that include genetic discrimination, sample and data sharing, and highlighting the role of ethics committees. Although international ethics harmonization and the subsequent coordination of consent forms may be necessary to maintain the quality and consistency of consent process for data-intensive international research, it is also worth paying more attention to the local values and different settings that exist where research participants are situated for research in medical genomics. More than simply tools to gain consent from research participants, ICFs function rather as a device of social communication between research communities and civic communities in liaison with intermediary agents like ethics committees, genetic counselors, and public biobanks and databases.

Citing Articles

Ethical challenges of conducting and reviewing human genomics research in Malaysia: An exploratory study.

Zee T, Bin Abdul Aziz M, Wei P Dev World Bioeth. 2023; 24(4):331-341.

PMID: 37997006 PMC: 11111594. DOI: 10.1111/dewb.12435.


Genetic discrimination: introducing the Asian perspective to the debate.

Kim H, Ho C, Ho C, Athira P, Kato K, De Castro L NPJ Genom Med. 2021; 6(1):54.

PMID: 34210984 PMC: 8249378. DOI: 10.1038/s41525-021-00218-4.


Meaning of Ambiguity: A Japanese Survey on Synthetic Biology and Genome Editing.

Hibino A, Yoshizawa G, Minari J Front Sociol. 2021; 4:81.

PMID: 33869403 PMC: 8022501. DOI: 10.3389/fsoc.2019.00081.


Public Attitudes Toward Precision Medicine: A Nationwide Survey on Developing a National Cohort Program for Citizen Participation in the Republic of Korea.

Kim H, Kim H, Kim S, Kim E, Kim S, Park H Front Genet. 2020; 11:283.

PMID: 32477396 PMC: 7235362. DOI: 10.3389/fgene.2020.00283.


Equitable Participation in Biobanks: The Risks and Benefits of a "Dynamic Consent" Approach.

Prictor M, Teare H, Kaye J Front Public Health. 2018; 6:253.

PMID: 30234093 PMC: 6133951. DOI: 10.3389/fpubh.2018.00253.


References
1.
Skinner H, Calancie L, Vu M, Garcia B, DeMarco M, Patterson C . Using community-based participatory research principles to develop more understandable recruitment and informed consent documents in genomic research. PLoS One. 2015; 10(5):e0125466. PMC: 4418607. DOI: 10.1371/journal.pone.0125466. View

2.
Jamal R, Syed Zakaria S, Kamaruddin M, Abd Jalal N, Ismail N, Mohd Kamil N . Cohort Profile: The Malaysian Cohort (TMC) project: a prospective study of non-communicable diseases in a multi-ethnic population. Int J Epidemiol. 2014; 44(2):423-31. PMC: 4469794. DOI: 10.1093/ije/dyu089. View

3.
Egalite N, Jaitovich Groisman I, Godard B . Genetic counseling practice in next generation sequencing research: implications for the ethical oversight of the informed consent process. J Genet Couns. 2014; 23(4):661-70. DOI: 10.1007/s10897-014-9703-x. View

4.
Hedgecoe A, Carvalho F, Lobmayer P, Raka F . Research ethics committees in Europe: implementing the directive, respecting diversity. J Med Ethics. 2006; 32(8):483-6. PMC: 2563384. DOI: 10.1136/jme.2005.013888. View

5.
Ngah A . Informed consent in Malaysia: an overview. J Int Bioethique. 2006; 16(1-2):143-61, 199. DOI: 10.3917/jib.161.0143. View