Article: A consumer/medical educator conference: new objectives for the medical curriculum

The authors discuss the development and proceedings of a highly structured conference at which 17 representatives from diverse non-medical groups and 14 medical educators from one medical school identified objectives needing greater emphasis in the medical curriculum. The conference emulated industry's use of consumer advisory panels. Using the nominal group technique, a group process used in business, the non-medical group developed independently a priority list of areas in which physicians might be better educated to serve society. The medical educators then joined the non-medical group to discuss and clarify the concerns given highest priority. The authors describe subsequent initiatives by the medical school to address aspects of the general concerns raised by the non-medical group. The conference represents an approach to seeking input from non-traditional sources in the development of the medical curriculum.

Citing Articles

Comparing two sampling methods to engage hard-to-reach communities in research priority setting.

Valerio M, Rodriguez N, Winkler P, Lopez J, Dennison M, Liang Y BMC Med Res Methodol. 2016; 16(1):146.

PMID: 27793191 PMC: 5084459. DOI: 10.1186/s12874-016-0242-z.

References

1.

Jensen P . The doctor-patient relationship: headed for impasse or improvement?. Ann Intern Med. 1981; 95(6):769-71. DOI: 10.7326/0003-4819-95-6-769. View

2.

Vojtecky M . Status and control in voluntary community health planning groups. Med Care. 1982; 20(12):1168-77. DOI: 10.1097/00005650-198212000-00003. View

3.

WELLS B . Role of the consumer in regional medical programs. Am J Public Health Nations Health. 1970; 60(11):2133-8. PMC: 1349261. DOI: 10.2105/ajph.60.11.2133. View

4.

Marston R, MAYER W . The interdependence of regional medical programs and continuing education. J Med Educ. 1967; 42(2):119-25. DOI: 10.1097/00001888-196702000-00003. View

5.

Milholland A, Wheeler S, Heieck J . Medical assessment by a Delphi group opinion technic. N Engl J Med. 1973; 288(24):1272-5. DOI: 10.1056/NEJM197306142882405. View

6.

Korsch B, GOZZI E, Francis V . Gaps in doctor-patient communication. 1. Doctor-patient interaction and patient satisfaction. Pediatrics. 1968; 42(5):855-71. View

7.

Nowak B . Marketing medicine to today's consumer. JAMA. 1979; 242(22):2403-4. View

8.

. Symposium on the training of tomorrow's physicians: how well are we meeting society's expectations? Committee on Medical Education, the New York Academy of Medicine. Bull N Y Acad Med. 1984; 60(3):219-308. PMC: 1911755. View

9.

Doyle B, Ware Jr J . Physician conduct and other factors that affect consumer satisfaction with medical care. J Med Educ. 1977; 52(10):793-801. DOI: 10.1097/00001888-197710000-00001. View

10.

Raspberry W . Sustaining human values. J Med Educ. 1983; 58(2):93-100. DOI: 10.1097/00001888-198302000-00002. View

11.

Trivedi V . Measurement of task delegations among nurses by nominal group process analysis. Med Care. 1982; 20(2):154-64. DOI: 10.1097/00005650-198202000-00003. View

12.

Hentges K, Hosokawa M . Delphi: group participation in needs assessment and curriculum development. J Sch Health. 1980; 50(8):447-50. DOI: 10.1111/j.1746-1561.1980.tb03126.x. View

A Consumer/medical Educator Conference: New Objectives for the Medical Curriculum