Turbulent Kinetic Energy in the Right Ventricle: Potential MR Marker for Risk Stratification of Adults with Repaired Tetralogy of Fallot
Overview
Authors
Affiliations
Purpose: To assess right ventricular (RV) turbulent kinetic energy (TKE) in patients with repaired Tetralogy of Fallot (rToF) and a spectrum of pulmonary regurgitation (PR), as well as to investigate the relationship between these 4D flow markers and RV remodeling.
Materials And Methods: Seventeen patients with rToF and 10 healthy controls were included in the study. Patients were divided into two groups based on PR fraction: one lower PR fraction group (≤11%) and one higher PR fraction group (>11%). Field strength/sequences: 3D cine phase contrast (4D flow), 2D cine phase contrast (2D flow), and balanced steady-state free precession (bSSFP) at 1.5T.
Assessment: The RV volume was segmented in the morphologic short-axis images and TKE parameters were computed inside the segmented RV volume throughout diastole. Statistical tests: One-way analysis of variance with Bonferroni post-hoc test; unpaired t-test; Pearson correlation coefficients; simple and stepwise multiple regression models; intraclass correlation coefficient (ICC).
Results: The higher PR fraction group had more remodeled RVs (140 ± 25 vs. 107 ± 22 [lower PR fraction, P < 0.01] and 93 ± 15 ml/m [healthy, P < 0.001] for RV end-diastolic volume index [RVEDVI]) and higher TKE values (5.95 ± 3.15 vs. 2.23 ± 0.81 [lower PR fraction, P < 0.01] and 1.91 ± 0.78 mJ [healthy, P < 0.001] for Peak Total RV TKE). Multiple regression analysis between RVEDVI and 4D/2D flow parameters showed that Peak Total RV TKE was the strongest predictor of RVEDVI (R = 0.47, P = 0.002).
Conclusion: The 4D flow-specific TKE markers showed a slightly stronger association with RV remodeling than conventional 2D flow PR parameters. These results suggest novel hemodynamic aspects of PR in the development of late complications after ToF repair.
Level Of Evidence: 2 Technical Efficacy: Stage 2 J. Magn. Reson. Imaging 2018;47:1043-1053.
Sjoberg P, Lala T, Wittgren J, Jin N, Hedstrom E, Toger J Eur Heart J Imaging Methods Pract. 2025; 2(4):qyae137.
PMID: 39776817 PMC: 11705387. DOI: 10.1093/ehjimp/qyae137.
Loke Y, Yildiran I, Capuano F, Balaras E, Olivieri L Int J Cardiovasc Imaging. 2024; 40(5):1135-1147.
PMID: 38668927 DOI: 10.1007/s10554-024-03084-0.
Advanced Imaging Technologies for Assessing Tetralogy of Fallot: Insights Into Flow Dynamics.
Schafer M, Mawad W CJC Pediatr Congenit Heart Dis. 2024; 2(6Part A):380-392.
PMID: 38161669 PMC: 10755841. DOI: 10.1016/j.cjcpc.2023.09.011.
4D-Flow MRI intracardiac flow analysis considering different subtypes of pulmonary hypertension.
Cain M, Schafer M, Ross L, Ivy D, Mitchell M, Fenster B Pulm Circ. 2023; 13(4):e12307.
PMID: 37941938 PMC: 10628368. DOI: 10.1002/pul2.12307.
The right ventricle in tetralogy of Fallot: adaptation to sequential loading.
Alipour Symakani R, van Genuchten W, Zandbergen L, Henry S, Taverne Y, Merkus D Front Pediatr. 2023; 11:1098248.
PMID: 37009270 PMC: 10061113. DOI: 10.3389/fped.2023.1098248.