» Articles » PMID: 28765136

Internet-based Support for Self-management Strategies for People with COPD-protocol for a Controlled Pragmatic Pilot Trial of Effectiveness and a Process Evaluation in Primary Healthcare

Overview
Journal BMJ Open
Specialty General Medicine
Date 2017 Aug 3
PMID 28765136
Citations 18
Authors
Affiliations
Soon will be listed here.
Abstract

Introduction: The use of adequate self-management strategies for people with chronic obstructive pulmonary disease (COPD) reduces healthcare use, improves health-related quality of life (HRQoL) and recovery after acute exacerbations. However, not many people with COPD receive support that promotes the use of such strategies and therefore new methods to facilitate and promote the use of self-management strategies are highly warranted. This pilot trial aims to evaluate the feasibility of the study design and study procedures considering effectiveness of the novel intervention, METHODS AND ANALYSIS: The overall design is a pragmatic controlled pilot trial with preassessments and postassessments and a parallel process evaluation. Patients with the diagnosis of COPD will be eligible for the study. The intervention group will be recruited when visiting one of the six participating primary care units in Sweden. The control group will be identified from the unit's computerised registers. The intervention, the COPD-web, is an interactive web page with two sections; one directed at people with COPD and one at healthcare professionals. The sections aim to support patients' self-management skills-and to facilitate the provision of support for self-management strategies, respectively. Effectiveness with regard to patients' symptoms, HRQoL, knowledge of and readiness for COPD-related self-management, health literacy, self-efficacy for physical activity and time spent in physical activity and time being sedentary, and further, healthcare professionals' knowledge of and readiness to support COPD-related self-management strategies will be assessed using questionnaires at 3 and 12 months. The process evaluation will include observations and interviews.

Ethics And Dissemination: Ethical approval has been obtained. Findings will be presented at conferences, submitted for publication in peer-reviewed publications and presented to the involved healthcare professionals, patients and to patient organisations.

Trial Registration Number: ClinicalTrials.gov: NCT02696187.

Citing Articles

Shifting Responsibilities: Developing a Pan-European Service Model for an eHealth Technology Supporting Self-Management of People with Chronic Obstructive Pulmonary Disease and Comorbidities.

Te Braake E, Grunloh C, Tabak M Int J Chron Obstruct Pulmon Dis. 2024; 19:175-192.

PMID: 38249825 PMC: 10800113. DOI: 10.2147/COPD.S432568.


Guiding Documents for Engaging with Remote Chronic Disease Management Programs as a Healthcare Provider: A Scoping Review.

Van Damme J, Bello-Haas V, Kuspinar A, Strachan P, Peters N, Nguyen K Int J Telerehabil. 2024; 15(2):e6583.

PMID: 38162933 PMC: 10754241. DOI: 10.5195/ijt.2023.6583.


Factors associated with health-related quality of life among employed individuals with chronic obstructive pulmonary disease: A correlational study in China.

Zhang P, Samartkit N, Masingboon K Belitung Nurs J. 2023; 9(3):271-279.

PMID: 37492761 PMC: 10363970. DOI: 10.33546/bnj.2654.


Experiences of Using an Electronic Health Tool Among Health Care Professionals Involved in Chronic Obstructive Pulmonary Disease Management: Qualitative Analysis.

Nyberg A, Sondell A, Lundell S, Marklund S, Tistad M, Wadell K JMIR Hum Factors. 2023; 10:e43269.

PMID: 36995743 PMC: 10131608. DOI: 10.2196/43269.


To Act or Not to Act-a Sense of Control Is Important for People With Chronic Obstructive Pulmonary Disease to Increase Physical Activity: Grounded Theory Study.

Marklund S, Sorlin A, Stenlund T, Wadell K, Nyberg A JMIR Form Res. 2023; 7:e39969.

PMID: 36735302 PMC: 9938439. DOI: 10.2196/39969.


References
1.
Velloso M, Jardim J . Study of energy expenditure during activities of daily living using and not using body position recommended by energy conservation techniques in patients with COPD. Chest. 2006; 130(1):126-32. DOI: 10.1378/chest.130.1.126. View

2.
Thorpe O, Johnston K, Kumar S . Barriers and enablers to physical activity participation in patients with COPD: a systematic review. J Cardiopulm Rehabil Prev. 2012; 32(6):359-69. DOI: 10.1097/HCR.0b013e318262d7df. View

3.
Demeyer H, Burtin C, Van Remoortel H, Hornikx M, Langer D, Decramer M . Standardizing the analysis of physical activity in patients with COPD following a pulmonary rehabilitation program. Chest. 2014; 146(2):318-327. PMC: 4122275. DOI: 10.1378/chest.13-1968. View

4.
Effing T, Bourbeau J, Vercoulen J, Apter A, Coultas D, Meek P . Self-management programmes for COPD: moving forward. Chron Respir Dis. 2012; 9(1):27-35. DOI: 10.1177/1479972311433574. View

5.
Wangdahl J, Martensson L . The communicative and critical health literacy scale--Swedish version. Scand J Public Health. 2013; 42(1):25-31. DOI: 10.1177/1403494813500592. View