» Articles » PMID: 28764665

Factors Influencing Timely Initiation and Completion of Gestational Diabetes Mellitus Screening and Diagnosis - a Qualitative Study from Tamil Nadu, India

Overview
Publisher Biomed Central
Date 2017 Aug 3
PMID 28764665
Citations 10
Authors
Affiliations
Soon will be listed here.
Abstract

Background: In 2007, universal screening for gestational diabetes mellitus (GDM) was introduced in Tamil Nadu, India. To identify factors hindering or facilitating timely initiation and completion of the GDM screening and diagnosis process, our study investigated how pregnant women in rural and urban Tamil Nadu access and navigate different GDM related health services.

Methods: The study was carried out in two settings: an urban private diabetes centre and a rural government primary health centre. Observations of the process of screening and diagnosis at the health centres as well as semi-structured interviews with 30 pregnant women and nine health care providers were conducted. Data was analysed using qualitative content analysis.

Results: There were significant differences in the process of GDM screening and diagnosis in the urban and rural settings. Several factors hindering or facilitating timely initiation and completion of the process were identified. Timely attendance required awareness, motivation and opportunity to attend. Women had to attend the health centre at the right time and sometimes at the right gestational age to initiate the test, wait to complete the test and obtain the test report in time to initiate further action. All these steps and requirements were influenced by factors within and outside the health system such as getting right information from health care providers, clinic timings, characteristics of the test, availability of transport, social network and support, and social norms and cultural practices.

Conclusions: Minimising and aligning complex stepwise processes of prenatal care and GDM screening delivery and attention to the factors influencing it are important for further improving and expanding GDM screening and related services, not only in Tamil Nadu but in other similar low and middle income settings. This study stresses the importance of guidelines and diagnostic criteria which are simple and feasible on the ground.

Citing Articles

Oral glucose tolerance test-The imperfect gold standard for gestational diabetes screening: A qualitative study involving clinicians in regional, rural and remote areas of Western Australia.

Kirke A, Spry E, Atkinson D, Sinclair C, Marley J Health Promot J Austr. 2024; 36(1):e899.

PMID: 38973209 PMC: 11729539. DOI: 10.1002/hpja.899.


Determinants of access to and use of gestational diabetes mellitus services in Kenya: a multimethod case study protocol.

Obongo A, Tallarek M, Spallek J BMJ Open. 2023; 13(12):e074916.

PMID: 38135334 DOI: 10.1136/bmjopen-2023-074916.


A community health worker-led program to improve access to gestational diabetes screening in urban slums of Pune, India: Results from a mixed methods study.

Chebrolu P, Chalem A, Ponticiello M, Broderick K, Vaidyanathan A, Lorenc R PLOS Glob Public Health. 2023; 3(10):e0001622.

PMID: 37889879 PMC: 10610081. DOI: 10.1371/journal.pgph.0001622.


Screening for gestational diabetes, Ahmedabad, India.

Nayak H, Gadhavi R, Solanki B, Aroor B, Gameti H, Shringarpure K Bull World Health Organ. 2022; 100(8):484-490.

PMID: 35923278 PMC: 9306388. DOI: 10.2471/BLT.22.288045.


Barriers to Screening for Gestational Diabetes Mellitus in New Zealand Following the Introduction of Universal Screening Recommendations.

Chepulis L, Papa V, Morison B, Cassim S, Martis R Womens Health Rep (New Rochelle). 2022; 3(1):465-472.

PMID: 35651990 PMC: 9148651. DOI: 10.1089/whr.2021.0149.


References
1.
Colagiuri S, Falavigna M, Agarwal M, Boulvain M, Coetzee E, Hod M . Strategies for implementing the WHO diagnostic criteria and classification of hyperglycaemia first detected in pregnancy. Diabetes Res Clin Pract. 2014; 103(3):364-72. DOI: 10.1016/j.diabres.2014.02.012. View

2.
Baqui A, Rosecrans A, Williams E, Agrawal P, Ahmed S, Darmstadt G . NGO facilitation of a government community-based maternal and neonatal health programme in rural India: improvements in equity. Health Policy Plan. 2008; 23(4):234-43. DOI: 10.1093/heapol/czn012. View

3.
Wado Y, Afework M, Hindin M . Effects of maternal pregnancy intention, depressive symptoms and social support on risk of low birth weight: a prospective study from southwestern Ethiopia. PLoS One. 2014; 9(5):e96304. PMC: 4029816. DOI: 10.1371/journal.pone.0096304. View

4.
Bruun Nielsen B, Hedegaard M, Thilsted S, Joseph A, Liljestrand J . Does antenatal care influence postpartum health behaviour? Evidence from a community based cross-sectional study in rural Tamil Nadu, South India. Br J Obstet Gynaecol. 1998; 105(7):697-703. DOI: 10.1111/j.1471-0528.1998.tb10198.x. View

5.
Hod M, Kapur A, Sacks D, Hadar E, Agarwal M, Di Renzo G . The International Federation of Gynecology and Obstetrics (FIGO) Initiative on gestational diabetes mellitus: A pragmatic guide for diagnosis, management, and care. Int J Gynaecol Obstet. 2015; 131 Suppl 3:S173-211. DOI: 10.1016/S0020-7292(15)30033-3. View