» Articles » PMID: 28761695

Misinterpretation of the Borg's Rating of Perceived Exertion Scale by Patients with Panic Disorder During Ergospirometry Challenge

Overview
Specialty Orthopedics
Date 2017 Aug 2
PMID 28761695
Citations 4
Authors
Affiliations
Soon will be listed here.
Abstract

Introduction: The most widely used instrument to measure perceived exertion or exercise intensity is the Borg's Rating of Perceived Exertion (RPE) Scale. Panic attacks are aversive experiences that may be triggered by bodily sensations such as palpitations, breathlessness or dizziness due to increasing autonomic distress, prior sensitisation to panic and fear conditioning. The consequence is catastrophic interpretation of bodily sensations of arousal in general, which can lead to misinterpretation of exertion or exercise intensity.

Purpose: To verify the effectiveness of the Borg's RPE Scale as a measure of perceived effort in panic disorder subjects.

Methods: The study enrolled 72 subjects: the control group (C, healthy sedentary subjects, n=30) and patients with panic disorder (PD, n=42). All subjects were submitted to an ergospirometry challenge. Perceived exertion RPE scores and heart rate at 90% VO2max were compared between groups.

Results: Patients with PD showed lower levels of maximal oxygen consumption, when compared with C group [VOmax (mL/kg/min): PD=29.42±6.50xC=34.51±5.35; Student's t-test=-3.51; p <0.05]. Furthermore, among PD subjects, the maximum heart rate during ergospirometry challenge was lower than expected [predict max HR (bpm)=200.85±6.33xheart rate test (bpm)=178.86±7.28; Z=-5.64; p<0.05]. Perceived exertion, as measured by RPE, was also overestimated in relation to heart rate at 90% of maximum oxygen consumption compared with controls (RPE90%VOmax: PD=18.93±0.55xC=16.67±0.60; U=8.00; Z=7.42; p<0.05).

Conclusions: The present study findings suggest that the Borg's RPE Scale may not be an appropriate measure of subjective exertion among subjects with panic disorder performing a cardiopulmonary exercise test.

Citing Articles

Motivational and emotional correlates of physical activity and sedentary behavior after cardiac rehabilitation: an observational study.

Fessler L, Tessitore E, Craviari C, Sarrazin P, Meyer P, Luthy C BMC Sports Sci Med Rehabil. 2024; 16(1):209.

PMID: 39363352 PMC: 11448298. DOI: 10.1186/s13102-024-00997-0.


The effect of hip abductor fatigue on knee kinematics and kinetics during normal gait.

Tang Y, Li Y, Yang M, Zheng X, An B, Zheng J Front Neurosci. 2022; 16:1003023.

PMID: 36267239 PMC: 9577318. DOI: 10.3389/fnins.2022.1003023.


Affective Determinants of Physical Activity: A Conceptual Framework and Narrative Review.

Stevens C, Baldwin A, Bryan A, Conner M, Rhodes R, Williams D Front Psychol. 2020; 11:568331.

PMID: 33335497 PMC: 7735992. DOI: 10.3389/fpsyg.2020.568331.


Toward a personalized therapy for panic disorder: preliminary considerations from a work in progress.

Caldirola D, Perna G Neuropsychiatr Dis Treat. 2019; 15:1957-1970.

PMID: 31371969 PMC: 6628946. DOI: 10.2147/NDT.S174433.

References
1.
Casaburi R . Limitation to exercise tolerance in chronic obstructive pulmonary disease: look to the muscles of ambulation. Am J Respir Crit Care Med. 2003; 168(4):409-10. DOI: 10.1164/rccm.2305013. View

2.
Louie D . The effects of cigarette smoking on cardiopulmonary function and exercise tolerance in teenagers. Can Respir J. 2001; 8(4):289-91. DOI: 10.1155/2001/701384. View

3.
Muotri R, Bernik M . Panic disorder and exercise avoidance. Braz J Psychiatry. 2014; 36(1):68-75. DOI: 10.1590/1516-4446-2012-1012. View

4.
Purvis J, Cureton K . Ratings of perceived exertion at the anaerobic threshold. Ergonomics. 1981; 24(4):295-300. DOI: 10.1080/00140138108924852. View

5.
Hureau T, Romer L, Amann M . The 'sensory tolerance limit': A hypothetical construct determining exercise performance?. Eur J Sport Sci. 2016; 18(1):13-24. PMC: 5420500. DOI: 10.1080/17461391.2016.1252428. View