» Articles » PMID: 28761643

A Prospective Randomised Trial of Isolated Pathogens of Surgical Site Infections (SSI)

Overview
Publisher Wolters Kluwer
Specialty Medical Education
Date 2017 Aug 2
PMID 28761643
Citations 15
Authors
Affiliations
Soon will be listed here.
Abstract

Background: Every surgical wound is colonized by bacteria, but only a small percentage displays symptoms of infection. The distribution of pathogens isolated in surgical site infections has not significantly changed over the last decades. Staph. Aureus, Coag(-) Staphylococci, Enterococcus spp and are the main strains appearing. In addition, a continuously rising proportion of surgical site infections caused by resistant bacterial species (MRSA, ) has been reported.

Methods: This prospective and randomized clinical study was performed in the 1st Surgical Clinic of Sismanoglion General Hospital of Athens, from February 2009 to February 2015. Patients undergoing elective surgery in the upper or lower digestive system were randomized to receive antimicrobial treatment as chemoprophylaxis. Each patient filled a special monitoring form, recording epidemiological data, surgery related information, surgical site infections (deep and superficial), as well as postoperative morbidity (urinary and respiratory infections included). The monitoring of patients was carried by multiple visits on a daily basis during their hospitalization and continued after they were discharged via phone to postoperative day 30.

Results: Our overall SSI incidence was 4,3% (31patients out of a whole of 715 patients). Specifically, the incidence of SSIs for scheduled surgery of the upper GI tract was 2,2% (11 out of 500 patients) and for the lower GI tract was 9,3% (20 out of 215 patients). Seven main pathogens were isolated from patients with SSIs: and . Their growth rates were respectively: (17,3%), (19,5%), (10,5%), (13,4%) (20,4%), (9,1%) and (9,8%). In addition, all the SSIs were found to be multimicrobial. Several studies have already revealed that patient characteristics and coexisting morbidities such as obesity, smoking, heart or renal failure, pre-existing localized infections and patients' age (especially if age exceeds 65) seem to be independent prognostic factors for surgical field infections. Additionally, classification of the surgical wound, surgical operation complexity, preoperative hospitalization, prolongation of surgical time and need for transfusions have been proved to differentiate the incidence of SSIs.

Conclusions: In conclusion, surgical site infections are important complications affecting the healthcare services, the cost of hospitalization and the patient himself. Future thorough studies are expected to reveal much more data, regarding predisposing and precautionary patient and hospital characteristics.

Citing Articles

Gut microbiome influences efficacy of Endostatin combined with PD-1 blockade against colorectal cancer.

Xu J, Tian Y, Zhao B, Hu D, Wu S, Ma J Mol Biomed. 2024; 5(1):37.

PMID: 39251538 PMC: 11383918. DOI: 10.1186/s43556-024-00200-3.


Surgical Site Infections in Gastrointestinal Surgeries: Estimation of Prevalence, Risk Factors and Bacteriological Profile.

K B, R S, J S, Satyanesan J Cureus. 2024; 16(6):e62589.

PMID: 39027770 PMC: 11256213. DOI: 10.7759/cureus.62589.


Exogenous L-Alanine promotes phagocytosis of multidrug-resistant bacterial pathogens.

Jiang M, Chen X, Li H, Peng X, Peng B EMBO Rep. 2023; 24(12):e49561.

PMID: 37943703 PMC: 10702822. DOI: 10.15252/embr.201949561.


Nosocomial infections in the surgical intensive care unit: an observational retrospective study from a large tertiary hospital in Palestine.

Aiesh B, Qashou R, Shemmessian G, Swaileh M, Abutaha S, Sabateen A BMC Infect Dis. 2023; 23(1):686.

PMID: 37833675 PMC: 10576355. DOI: 10.1186/s12879-023-08677-z.


The effect of high perioperative inspiratory oxygen fraction for abdominal surgery on surgical site infection: a systematic review and meta-analysis.

Kuh J, Jung W, Lim L, Yoo H, Ju J, Lee H Sci Rep. 2023; 13(1):15599.

PMID: 37730856 PMC: 10511429. DOI: 10.1038/s41598-023-41300-4.


References
1.
Haley R, Culver D, Morgan W, White J, Emori T, Hooton T . Identifying patients at high risk of surgical wound infection. A simple multivariate index of patient susceptibility and wound contamination. Am J Epidemiol. 1985; 121(2):206-15. DOI: 10.1093/oxfordjournals.aje.a113991. View

2.
Vegas A, Jodra V, Garcia M . Nosocomial infection in surgery wards: a controlled study of increased duration of hospital stays and direct cost of hospitalization. Eur J Epidemiol. 1993; 9(5):504-10. View

3.
Broex E, van Asselt A, Bruggeman C, van Tiel F . Surgical site infections: how high are the costs?. J Hosp Infect. 2009; 72(3):193-201. DOI: 10.1016/j.jhin.2009.03.020. View

4.
Calia F, WOLINSKY E, MORTIMER Jr E, Abrams J, RAMMELKAMP Jr C . Importance of the carrier state as a source of Staphylococcus aureus in wound sepsis. J Hyg (Lond). 1969; 67(1):49-57. PMC: 2130695. DOI: 10.1017/s0022172400041413. View

5.
Smith R, Bohl J, McElearney S, Friel C, Barclay M, Sawyer R . Wound infection after elective colorectal resection. Ann Surg. 2004; 239(5):599-605. PMC: 1356267. DOI: 10.1097/01.sla.0000124292.21605.99. View