» Articles » PMID: 28758098

Mobile Phone Radiofrequency Exposure Has No Effect on DNA Double Strand Breaks (DSB) in Human Lymphocytes

Overview
Journal Ann Transl Med
Date 2017 Aug 1
PMID 28758098
Citations 6
Authors
Affiliations
Soon will be listed here.
Abstract

Background: The use of mobile phones has been associated with an increased risk of developing certain type of cancer, especially in long term users. Therefore, this study was aimed to investigate the potential genotoxic effect of mobile phone radiofrequency exposure on human peripheral blood mononuclear cells

Methods: The study population consisted in 14 healthy volunteers. After collection of two whole blood samples, the former was placed in a plastic rack, 1 cm from the chassis of a commercial mobile phone (900 MHz carrier frequency), which was activated by a 30-min call. The second blood sample was instead maintained far from mobile phones or other RF sources. The influence of mobile phone RF on DNA integrity was assessed by analyzing γ-H2AX foci in lymphocytes using immunofluorescence staining kit on AKLIDES.

Results: No measure of γ-H2AX foci was significantly influenced by mobile phone RF exposure, nor mobile phone exposure was associated with significant risk of genetic damages (odds ratio comprised between 0.27 and 1.00).

Conclusions: The results of this experimental study demonstrate that exposure of human lymphocytes to a conventional 900 MHz RF emitted by a commercial mobile phone for 30 min does not significantly impact DNA integrity.

Citing Articles

Study of genotoxic and cytotoxic effects induced in human fibroblasts by exposure to pulsed and continuous 1.6 GHz radiofrequency.

Massaro L, De Sanctis S, Franchini V, Regalbuto E, Alfano G, Focaccetti C Front Public Health. 2024; 12:1419525.

PMID: 39145180 PMC: 11323689. DOI: 10.3389/fpubh.2024.1419525.


Human Fibroblasts In Vitro Exposed to 2.45 GHz Continuous and Pulsed Wave Signals: Evaluation of Biological Effects with a Multimethodological Approach.

Regalbuto E, Anselmo A, De Sanctis S, Franchini V, Lista F, Benvenuto M Int J Mol Sci. 2020; 21(19).

PMID: 32992895 PMC: 7584027. DOI: 10.3390/ijms21197069.


Microwaves from mobile phone induce reactive oxygen species but not DNA damage, preleukemic fusion genes and apoptosis in hematopoietic stem/progenitor cells.

Durdik M, Kosik P, Markova E, Somsedikova A, Gajdosechova B, Nikitina E Sci Rep. 2019; 9(1):16182.

PMID: 31700008 PMC: 6838175. DOI: 10.1038/s41598-019-52389-x.


Electromagnetic Fields of Mobile Phone Jammer Exposure on Blood Factors in Rats.

Shojaeifard M, Jarideh S, Owjfard M, Nematollahii S, Talaei-Khozani T, Malekzadeh M J Biomed Phys Eng. 2018; 8(4):403-408.

PMID: 30568930 PMC: 6280113.


Comment on "Mobile phone radiofrequency exposure has no effect on DNA double strand breaks (DSB) in human lymphocytes".

Mortazavi S Ann Transl Med. 2017; 5(21):441.

PMID: 29201892 PMC: 5690963. DOI: 10.21037/atm.2017.08.39.


References
1.
Belyaev I, Eriksson S, Nygren J, Torudd J, Harms-Ringdahl M . Effects of ethidium bromide on DNA loop organisation in human lymphocytes measured by anomalous viscosity time dependence and single cell gel electrophoresis. Biochim Biophys Acta. 1999; 1428(2-3):348-56. DOI: 10.1016/s0304-4165(99)00076-8. View

2.
Verschaeve L, Heikkinen P, Verheyen G, Gorp U, Boonen F, Vander Plaetse F . Investigation of co-genotoxic effects of radiofrequency electromagnetic fields in vivo. Radiat Res. 2006; 165(5):598-607. DOI: 10.1667/RR3559.1. View

3.
Tepe Cam S, Seyhan N . Single-strand DNA breaks in human hair root cells exposed to mobile phone radiation. Int J Radiat Biol. 2012; 88(5):420-4. DOI: 10.3109/09553002.2012.666005. View

4.
Gong X, Wu J, Mao Y, Zhou L . [Long-term use of mobile phone and its association with glioma: a systematic review and meta-analysis]. Zhonghua Yi Xue Za Zhi. 2015; 94(39):3102-6. View

5.
Ivashkevich A, Martin O, Smith A, Redon C, Bonner W, Martin R . γH2AX foci as a measure of DNA damage: a computational approach to automatic analysis. Mutat Res. 2011; 711(1-2):49-60. PMC: 3101310. DOI: 10.1016/j.mrfmmm.2010.12.015. View