» Articles » PMID: 28756951

Piercing of Consciousness As a Threshold-Crossing Operation

Overview
Journal Curr Biol
Publisher Cell Press
Specialty Biology
Date 2017 Aug 1
PMID 28756951
Citations 18
Authors
Affiliations
Soon will be listed here.
Abstract

Many decisions arise through an accumulation of evidence to a terminating threshold. The process, termed bounded evidence accumulation (or drift diffusion), provides a unified account of decision speed and accuracy, and it is supported by neurophysiology in human and animal models. In many situations, a decision maker may not communicate a decision immediately and yet feel that at some point she had made up her mind. We hypothesized that this occurs when an accumulation of evidence reaches a termination threshold, registered, subjectively, as an "aha" moment. We asked human participants to make perceptual decisions about the net direction of dynamic random dot motion. The difficulty and viewing duration were controlled by the experimenter. After indicating their choice, participants adjusted the setting of a clock to the moment they felt they had reached a decision. The subjective decision times (ts) were faster on trials with stronger (easier) motion, and they were well fit by a bounded drift-diffusion model. The fits to the ts alone furnished parameters that fully predicted the choices (accuracy) of four of the five participants. The quality of the prediction provides compelling evidence that these subjective reports correspond to the terminating process of a decision rather than a post hoc inference or arbitrary report. Thus, conscious awareness of having reached a decision appears to arise when the brain's representation of accumulated evidence reaches a threshold or bound. We propose that such a mechanism might play a more widespread role in the "piercing of consciousness" by non-conscious thought processes.

Citing Articles

The neuroscience of mental illness: Building toward the future.

Gordon J, Dzirasa K, Petzschner F Cell. 2024; 187(21):5858-5870.

PMID: 39423804 PMC: 11490687. DOI: 10.1016/j.cell.2024.09.028.


Challenging the fixed-criterion model of perceptual decision-making.

Lee J, Denison R, Ma W Neurosci Conscious. 2023; 2023(1):niad010.

PMID: 37089450 PMC: 10118309. DOI: 10.1093/nc/niad010.


Decoding internally generated transitions of conscious contents in the prefrontal cortex without subjective reports.

Kapoor V, Dwarakanath A, Safavi S, Werner J, Besserve M, Panagiotaropoulos T Nat Commun. 2022; 13(1):1535.

PMID: 35318323 PMC: 8940963. DOI: 10.1038/s41467-022-28897-2.


From non-conscious processing to conscious events: a minimalist approach.

Sklar A, Kardosh R, Hassin R Neurosci Conscious. 2021; 2021(2):niab026.

PMID: 34676105 PMC: 8524171. DOI: 10.1093/nc/niab026.


Evidence accumulation relates to perceptual consciousness and monitoring.

Pereira M, Megevand P, Tan M, Chang W, Wang S, Rezai A Nat Commun. 2021; 12(1):3261.

PMID: 34059682 PMC: 8166835. DOI: 10.1038/s41467-021-23540-y.


References
1.
Ploran E, Nelson S, Velanova K, Donaldson D, Petersen S, Wheeler M . Evidence accumulation and the moment of recognition: dissociating perceptual recognition processes using fMRI. J Neurosci. 2007; 27(44):11912-24. PMC: 6673371. DOI: 10.1523/JNEUROSCI.3522-07.2007. View

2.
Fleming S, Dolan R . The neural basis of metacognitive ability. Philos Trans R Soc Lond B Biol Sci. 2012; 367(1594):1338-49. PMC: 3318765. DOI: 10.1098/rstb.2011.0417. View

3.
Kiani R, Cueva C, Reppas J, Newsome W . Dynamics of neural population responses in prefrontal cortex indicate changes of mind on single trials. Curr Biol. 2014; 24(13):1542-7. PMC: 4191655. DOI: 10.1016/j.cub.2014.05.049. View

4.
North B, Curtis D, Sham P . A note on calculation of empirical P values from Monte Carlo procedure. Am J Hum Genet. 2003; 72(2):498-9. PMC: 379244. DOI: 10.1086/346173. View

5.
Rangel A, Camerer C, Montague P . A framework for studying the neurobiology of value-based decision making. Nat Rev Neurosci. 2008; 9(7):545-56. PMC: 4332708. DOI: 10.1038/nrn2357. View