» Articles » PMID: 28754954

Improvement of Total Etching Dentin Bonding with Subpressure

Overview
Journal Sci Rep
Specialty Science
Date 2017 Jul 30
PMID 28754954
Citations 3
Authors
Affiliations
Soon will be listed here.
Abstract

This study aimed to investigate the effects of subpressure on the bond properties of total-etching adhesive to dentin. Thirty-six caries-free premolars were sectioned parallel to the occlusal plane and randomly divided into four groups (n = 9): a control group (C, no treatment) and three subpressure groups, which were treated under 0.8, 0.6 or 0.4 bar after applying adhesives, named S, S and S, respectively. Afterward, resin was bonded to the dentin surface, and 27 beams (1.0 mm × 1.0 mm) of each group were sectioned. One was selected to observe the bonding interface from each group by SEM. Each group was divided into two subgroups (n = 13): 24 hours of water storage (I) and 10,000 thermocycling (A). The microtensile bond strength (μTBS), failure modes and nanoleakage expression were evaluated. SEM results showed that the subpressure groups had longer and denser resin tags. The μTBS of the subpressure groups was higher than that of the control group (p < 0.05). The subpressure groups were dominated by mixed failure, whereas main interfacial failure appeared in group C. The subpressure groups showed less silver deposition than the control group (p < 0.05). The subpressure technique may remarkably improve bonding strength and decrease nanoleakage on total-etching bonding.

Citing Articles

Introduction to subpressure-driven soft deformation method for removing inherent voids in green components manufactured by material extrusion.

Im T, Oh H, Goh B, Kim J, Lee J, Choi J Heliyon. 2024; 10(7):e28689.

PMID: 38596138 PMC: 11002578. DOI: 10.1016/j.heliyon.2024.e28689.


Comparative Evaluation of the Microleakage and Shear Bond Strength of Three Filled Pit and Fissure Sealants Using Subpressure and Adhesive System: An Experimental Analysis.

Waghmode S, Devendrappa S, Hadakar S, Gaonkar N, Gugawad S, Taur S Int J Clin Pediatr Dent. 2023; 16(Suppl 1):S97-S100.

PMID: 37663217 PMC: 10474389. DOI: 10.5005/jp-journals-10005-2633.


Improvement of Pit-and-Fissure Sealant Bonding to Enamel with Subpressure Treatment.

Zhang C, Li Y, Zhang Z, Tian Y, Ding N, Ma Y Biomed Res Int. 2019; 2019:5070383.

PMID: 31032348 PMC: 6458865. DOI: 10.1155/2019/5070383.

References
1.
Bernardo M, Luis H, Martin M, Leroux B, Rue T, Leitao J . Survival and reasons for failure of amalgam versus composite posterior restorations placed in a randomized clinical trial. J Am Dent Assoc. 2007; 138(6):775-83. DOI: 10.14219/jada.archive.2007.0265. View

2.
Hebling J, Pashley D, Tjaderhane L, Tay F . Chlorhexidine arrests subclinical degradation of dentin hybrid layers in vivo. J Dent Res. 2005; 84(8):741-6. DOI: 10.1177/154405910508400811. View

3.
Wilder Jr A, Swift Jr E, Heymann H, Ritter A, Sturdevant J, Bayne S . A 12-year clinical evaluation of a three-step dentin adhesive in noncarious cervical lesions. J Am Dent Assoc. 2009; 140(5):526-35. DOI: 10.14219/jada.archive.2009.0220. View

4.
Shinagawa J, Inoue G, Nikaido T, Ikeda M, Sadr A, Tagami J . Dentin bonding performance and interface observation of an MMA-based restorative material. Dent Mater J. 2016; 35(4):578-84. DOI: 10.4012/dmj.2015-363. View

5.
Tay F, Pashley D, Yoshiyama M . Two modes of nanoleakage expression in single-step adhesives. J Dent Res. 2002; 81(7):472-6. DOI: 10.1177/154405910208100708. View