» Articles » PMID: 28754002

Pediatric Respiratory Support Technology and Practices: A Global Survey

Overview
Specialty Health Services
Date 2017 Jul 30
PMID 28754002
Citations 2
Authors
Affiliations
Soon will be listed here.
Abstract

Objective: This global survey aimed to assess the current respiratory support capabilities for children with hypoxemia and respiratory failure in different economic settings.

Methods: An online, anonymous survey of medical providers with experience in managing pediatric acute respiratory illness was distributed electronically to members of the World Federation of Pediatric Intensive and Critical Care Society, and other critical care websites for 3 months.

Results: The survey was completed by 295 participants from 64 countries, including 28 High-Income (HIC) and 36 Low- and Middle-Income Countries (LMIC). Most respondents (≥84%) worked in urban tertiary care centers. For managing acute respiratory failure, endotracheal intubation with mechanical ventilation was the most commonly reported form of respiratory support (≥94% in LMIC and HIC). Continuous Positive Airway Pressure (CPAP) was the most commonly reported form of non-invasive positive pressure support (≥86% in LMIC and HIC). Bubble-CPAP was used by 36% HIC and 39% LMIC participants. ECMO for acute respiratory failure was reported by 45% of HIC participants, compared to 34% of LMIC. Oxygen, air, gas humidifiers, breathing circuits, patient interfaces, and oxygen saturation monitoring appear widely available. Reported ICU patient to health care provider ratios were higher in LMIC compared to HIC. The frequency of respiratory assessments was hourly in HIC, compared to every 2-4 h in LMIC.

Conclusions: This survey indicates many apparent similarities in the presence of respiratory support systems in urban care centers globally, but system quality, quantity, and functionality were not established by this survey. LMIC ICUs appear to have higher patient to medical staff ratios, with decreased patient monitoring frequencies, suggesting patient safety should be a focus during the introduction of new respiratory support devices and practices.

Citing Articles

Contextual factors influencing bubble continuous positive airway pressure implementation for paediatric respiratory distress in low-income and middle-income countries: a realist review.

Ijaz N, Nader M, Ponticiello M, Vance A, van de Water B, Funaro M Lancet Glob Health. 2024; 13(2):e232-e245.

PMID: 39675373 PMC: 11779698. DOI: 10.1016/S2214-109X(24)00453-4.


Short-term Non-invasive Ventilation for Children with Palliative Care Needs.

Chua K, Paranchothy M, Ng S, Lee C Indian J Palliat Care. 2024; 30(2):182-186.

PMID: 38846132 PMC: 11152513. DOI: 10.25259/IJPC_304_2023.


Innovations and adaptations in neonatal and pediatric respiratory care for resource constrained settings.

Wu A, Mukhtar-Yola M, Luch S, John S, Adhikari B, Bakker C Front Pediatr. 2022; 10:954975.

PMID: 36389382 PMC: 9659573. DOI: 10.3389/fped.2022.954975.

References
1.
Bahman-Bijari B, Malekiyan A, Niknafs P, Baneshi M . Bubble-CPAP vs. Ventilatory-CPAP in Preterm Infants with Respiratory Distress. Iran J Pediatr. 2012; 21(2):151-8. PMC: 3446163. View

2.
Subhi R, Adamson M, Campbell H, Weber M, Smith K, Duke T . The prevalence of hypoxaemia among ill children in developing countries: a systematic review. Lancet Infect Dis. 2009; 9(4):219-27. DOI: 10.1016/S1473-3099(09)70071-4. View

3.
Chen A, Deshmukh A, Richards-Kortum R, Molyneux E, Kawaza K, Cantor S . Cost-effectiveness analysis of a low-cost bubble CPAP device in providing ventilatory support for neonates in Malawi - a preliminary report. BMC Pediatr. 2014; 14:288. PMC: 4247223. DOI: 10.1186/s12887-014-0288-1. View

4.
Duke T . CPAP: a guide for clinicians in developing countries. Paediatr Int Child Health. 2013; 34(1):3-11. DOI: 10.1179/2046905513Y.0000000102. View

5.
Duke T, Mgone J, Frank D . Hypoxaemia in children with severe pneumonia in Papua New Guinea. Int J Tuberc Lung Dis. 2001; 5(6):511-9. View